Planners snubbed over invergordon projectCompany considers appeal

Highland town celebrates as waste plan thrown out

By Iain Ramage

Published: 19/08/2009

Champagne corks popped in celebration last night over a Highland community’s victory in sinking plans for a £43million incinerator close to homes and schools.

Highland Council’s Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross area planning committee went against the advice of its officers by rejecting the proposals for a site at Invergordon.

It followed a passionate day-long debate at the town’s packed social club.

The plan was rejected in an 8-4 vote on the grounds of road safety, detrimental effect on amenity, breach of the council’s waste policy, as the plant would service a wider area of the Highlands, and proximity to the community.

Councillors had been greeted on their arrival by more than 100 placard-waving objectors. That number had doubled by the start of the meeting and most stayed for the entire debate, which ended after 5pm.

The exchanges were dominated by a perceived risk to public health, possible blight of the area and road safety dangers caused by a big increase in lorry traffic accessing the proposed site from the notorious Tomich junction on the A9 Inverness-Thurso road.

Combined Power and Heat (Highlands) wants to build an incinerator capable of burning 100,000 tonnes of non-hazardous waste per year, producing enough electricity in the process to power 10,000 homes.

Community leaders queued up to voice concerns about the potential emission of cancer-causing dioxins from a chimney at the plant, on the site of a former aluminium smelter in the Cromarty Firth Industrial Park.

More than 2,000 people had signed petitions against the proposal, warning it would blight the area and leave Invergordon the “waste dump of the Highlands”.

Jubilant residents celebrated the success of their campaign by cracking open a bottle of champagne on the doorstep of the social club and the celebrations continued last night at a number of homes in the town.

Midwife and mother-of-two Karen MacKay, of 55 Saltburn Village, Invergordon, said: “I feel absolutely fantastic. The councillors listened to reason. Nobody knows the real health impact and, until they do, the right decision was made today.”

Saltburn Community Council secretary Norma Young, of 46 Saltburn Village, said: “At the end of the day, the councillors listened to the people and that’s what democracy is.”

Senior planners insisted the proposal complied with the authority’s local plan, as well as national and regional strategies on waste.

Speaking of his disappointment moments after the verdict, company managing director Glenn Jones said: “This multimillion-pound plant would have created a substantial number of jobs.

“The technology has been proven over many years and has been used safely across Europe.

“We will now consider our next move, including whether or not to appeal.”

To meet Scottish Government targets, councils must reduce waste going to landfill to 5% by 2025. The nationwide level is now about 75%.

Celebrating the committee’s decision, Cromarty Firth SNP councillor Maxine Smith said: “Unanimously, Tomich junction was an issue, so I’m glad that will now be investigated. It will add impetus to that.

“But I am so disappointed with the officers’ report, which was not objective. It never mentioned the health issues. It was a centralistic agenda put together by officials in Inverness and was skewed towards granting it.”

Highland Council chief executive Alistair Dodds is considering a plea from SNP opposition group leader John Finnie to launch an inquiry into his senior planners’ handling of the application.

Reader's Comments

with the corruption within our council one cannot but think our planning people will even consider the local peoples feelings regarding the current application for an incinerator - PETERHEAD DOES NOT WANT NOR NEED THIS INCINERATOR
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

The refusal by the Planning Committee for a £43m Waste to Energy plant to be built on the Cromarty Firth Industrial Park, is reminiscent of the failed application by Scottish Water Authority to build a sewerage works adjacent Macdonald’s yard at Roskeen...just eyewash. When the SWA application went to a Public Enquiry the decision was overturned, thus enabling SWA to compulsory purchase land belonging to a local farmer for its extensive project that had been planned initially, though never revealed. The fact that only twelve of the nineteen members of the Planning Committee voted on the controversial Planning Application by Power and Heat (Highlands) Ltd. in itself reflects their (the Planning Committee’s) appreciation of an appeal being lodged soon and perhaps leading to a Public Enquiry. On a much wider, and totally ignored picture up to now, Waste to Energy (Highland)Ltd. could be linked to the newly built waste centre on the harbour front in Inverness, next door to the multi million pound marina. The site is owned by a Member of the Inverness Harbour Board, Mr Sandy Catto, as does the ‘shed’. The IHB has had a substantial grant from the Scottish Executive know as a ‘Freight Facility Grant’ the agreement is that the ‘Board’ will be responsible for taking ‘X’ number of lorries off the road some time in the future. This arrangement will be accomplished when the ‘Board’ starts shipping waste material out of Inverness, by sea rather than by road. Now, without question the most logical place that waste could be shipped by sea from Inverness, is of course, Invergordon. As we all know ‘Port Authorities’ do not need to answer to Planning Committees, so lets look at a inspirational scenario; say if the Cromarty Firth Port Authority (CFPA) was to purchase the smelter site at Invergordon from its present owners Alcan, then the local Highland Planning Committee could have no jurisdiction over the development of an incinerator thereon, nor the import of waste material by sea to Invergordon. It’s a sobering thought.
Euilleam Ross
Report this comment

Further, the planning application at Invergordon has nothing to do with the Grampian Planning Authority. Thomas Owenson should get his facts right!
Euilleam Ross
Report this comment

I would like to point out to all your readers that at least we spoke up for what we believed in - we didn't just write about it hidden behind the newspapers. Mr Ross was in fact named at the hearing as the only person who had propossed the site, but was he even there? If he was then I feel that it is justified that he could talk on this planning hearing. maybe then he would know that the company is actually called Combined Power and Heat (Highland ) Ltd. He was also invited to come to local meetings to hear the other side of the arguement which we did - we asked for the adivce from waste to energy experts and also the institute of engineers - Mr Ross would have learnt all of this if he had attended yesterday. I think our elected councillors are professional enough to make their own minds up - if there is an appeal then so be it - we will be armed with even more information.
karen mackay
Report this comment

The readers of the Press and Journal need to know that Euilleam Ross likes the sound of his own voice - only nobody ever listens to or takes any heed of him. He does not stand up in public and speak - he hides behind newspapers instead. Euilleam Ross did not attend the planning hearing at the Social Club in Invergordon. He was named at the Planning Hearing as a supporter of the incinerator but he obviously could not face the many members of the public who were there opposed to the proposed incinerator - I wonder why??? He also needs to get his facts right before putting in print the "garbage" that he does.
Catherine Richmond
Report this comment

Dear Mr Ross, your comments are totally and utterly ridicously, you are obviously very misguided - misinformed - with out any relevant facts and after yesterday feeling very sick both physically and emotional putting you way off balance, for this reason I do feel very sorry for you. The councillors yesterday were professional intelligent sensitive and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what they thought was right, the residents of Invergordon showed intelligence morals and a belief in what was right for them and their town, Well done to each and every one of you except of course Mr Ross. When you are feeling better Mr Ross from what ever is afflicting please feel free to contact us and we will hire a lorry for a few hours and I will drop round the evidence facts and research that will finally allow to make well balanced intelligent decisions.
Tina McCaffery
Report this comment

Regarding Mr Ross's comments about the Invergordon application not having anything to do with the Grampian Planning Authority. There is a connection. Buchan Combined Heat and Power Ltd have a planning application in for an incinerator in Peterhead (Ref: APP/2008/1299) and has a Managing Director called Mr Glenn Jones. Sound familiar? Also this is in the remit of Aberdeenshire Council's Planning Department. Where is the Grampian Planning Authority? What did Mr Ross say about getting facts right?
Liz Wilson
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.