Attorney general’s job on the line

By James Tapsfield and Joe Churcher

Published: 23/09/2009

Attorney General Baroness Scotland’s job was hanging in the balance last night after she was fined £5,000 for employing an illegal worker as a housekeeper.

Despite issuing a grovelling apology and receiving backing from Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the peer risked inflaming the row further by comparing her mistake to forgetting to pay the congestion charge in London.

Political opponents said she was “breathtakingly complacent” and accused the prime minister of “dithering” over sacking her.

The UK Border Agency launched a probe after it emerged that a Tongan citizen paid by Lady Scotland to look after her London home had overstayed her student visa.

Yesterday, chief executive Lin Homer accepted the peer had not “knowingly” employed an illegal worker, and “took steps” to check documents for 27-year-old Loloahi Tapui.

“However, the law requires that employers must keep copies of documents proving the right to work in the UK and in this instance the employer failed to meet this requirement,” she added.

Lady Scotland, the government’s top legal officer, said she “fully accepted“ the findings.

“It’s like driving into the city and not paying the congestion charge. It’s not a criminal offence,” she said in a TV interview.

“I made an administrative, technical error for which I am bitterly, bitterly, sorry. I will never fail to take a photocopy again.

“I got it wrong. It was a technical breach and I have paid the penalty.”

Aides insisted Lady Scotland had not been downplaying the importance of the mistake but had merely been highlighting the difference between a criminal and civil offence.

The remarks risked undermining efforts by Mr Brown to draw a line under the damaging episode, however.

He had released a statement saying: “In line with the ministerial code I have consulted the Cabinet secretary and, given the UK Border Agency is satisfied she did not knowingly employ an illegal worker and took steps to check the documents, I have concluded that no further action is necessary given the investigation and action that has already been taken by the appropriate authorities and her unreserved apology.”

Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: “There is a breathtaking culture of complacency at the heart of this government. You don’t get a £5,000 fine for not paying the congestion charge.

“Her comments underline how bad Gordon Brown’s judgment has been in giving her his full backing.”

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne also called for Lady Scotland to go: “Law makers should not be law breakers, and this applies even more to Baroness Scotland due to her special position as chief law officer.

“Her position now looks untenable.”

Reader's Comments

one was under the impression the government was being cleaned up - just another example of political corruption - why should you have or deserve to have such an honourable title as Baroness Scotland when you have absolutely nothing in common with Scotland - RESIGN NOW
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

An insult to scots. What exactly did this woman do to be endowed with such a title? Then of course there's the "oops sorry, I never noticed!". I'll try that the next time I get a ticket!
manniewe naename
Report this comment

give her a break what had she to gain by doing it knowingly, nothing, we have become a nation of hatred, greed and someone must be to blame.
bob seivwright
Report this comment

This gave me a laugh. You're showing your ignorance guys. The woman's name is Patricia Scotland. You know, a bit like Lord Mandelson being Peter Mandelson.
Andrew Buchan
Report this comment

Hi Andrew - you seem to know what was her original name? what ever it was getting the title Baroness Scotland its totally misleading and confusing Why should we give her a break who knows what else she has done in her position of authority she is no different from the rest of the corrupt politicians and deserves to go
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.