Tensions emerge as plans for civic square set to go on public display

By Morag Lindsay

Published: 09/10/2009

Plans to create a civic square in Aberdeen’s Union Terrace Gardens as part of the £140million revamp of the area will be presented to the public next month.

The scheme envisages levelling over the gardens and overhauling the Denburn Valley. A public consultation will take place in November and December, before a decision is made on whether to proceed with detailed designs and a planning application.

The consultation will be the first priority for the steering group of community and business leaders forming the Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future (ACSEF) group – the public-private partnership behind the development.

Members include representatives of Aberdeen City and Shire councils, Scottish Enterprise, Nestrans and Aberdeen City Centre Association. The group will also explore potential funding sources, the economic impact of the proposal and transport issues.

The 12-strong steering group also involves Jennifer Craw, representing Sir Ian Wood, who is one of Scotland's wealthiest businessmen. He has pledged to sink £50million of his own fortune into the bid.

The announcement follows concerns this week that it would not be possible to meet the Christmas deadline for gathering public feedback.

Divisions have also started to emerge among members of the steering group.

Peacock Visual Arts, represented on the group by director Lindsay Gordon, said it signed up in the belief that the public would be given the chance to comment on all options for the site. Peacock Visual Arts is making a bid to build a new centre for the contemporary arts in the gardens.

Peacock has already raised £9.5million and secured planning permission for its alternative proposal. ACSEF says it is willing to find a way of accommodating the centre within the plans, but Peacock’s funding is time-limited and project-specific to the original scheme.

Last night, Mr Gordon said: “Peacock Visual Arts joined the steering group to try and ensure that the best possible result was delivered for the people of Aberdeen by having a public consultation that explored the full range of potential options for the gardens objectively and without preordained outcomes. We believe that the citizens of Aberdeen have the right to have this debate.

“However, it would appear from the statement issued from ACSEF that the people are only going to be asked what they want to be in Sir Ian Wood’s scheme rather than having a broader and more fundamental debate on whether they actually want a development that will cover up the gardens forever.

“We have been inundated by Aberdonians who want to express their concerns for the future of Peacock and the loss of Union Terrace Gardens.

“It will be very disappointing if the people are denied their right to be consulted on whether they want to lose their gardens.”

Dave Blackwood, ACSEF board member and chairman, said a feasibility study had shown that raising the gardens to street level and covering over the Denburn dual carriageway was the only way to create a civic square to meet the aspirations of the region and link the city’s business and cultural quarters.

He said: “An attractive, safer and better connected city centre will have far-reaching benefits and make sure it truly reflects the success and prosperity of our region and that we can proudly and comfortably claim to be the energy capital of the eastern hemisphere.”

Reader's Comments

We don't want to lose the Gardens. This scheme will be a disaster.
Andrew Buchan
Report this comment

A petition has been set up for those who wish to save the gardens: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-the-new-contemporary-art-centre-in-union-terrace-gardens.html The idea that destroying the Gardens and raising the area will create a more attractive and safer city centre are simply pie-in-the sky.
Fraser Denholm
Report this comment

If the public are not fully educated, informed and consulted on the future of the Gardens. Then those of influence in the city of Aberdeen make a mockery of democracy and their citizens. The meeting that I attended to 'consult the young professionals' did nothing to listen and bend to any contrary opinion. It was a forum where Sir Ian held the microphone and refuted any opposition which is easy to do if you do not allow the other voice to reply or be properly heard. I do not understand how any person in a position of power could see it as dignified not to yield to the visions of the people they are supposed to serve. My prayer is that all that is currently being done and said in private will come to light for all to see and a truly better more balanced city will be created for the generations to come.
Anita Jean Stewart
Report this comment

Was Union terrace gardens gifted to the people of Aberdeen by The Bruce as part of the common good fund? (Can someone tell me if this is right?) If it was then it should be up to the people of Aberdeen to decide its fate and not some rich bloke and his cronies. Sir Iain could be Scotland answer to TRUPM
Robert Horne
Report this comment

Yes, I too recall the consultation with young professionals/under graduates earlier this year. Many attendees were blissfully unaware that the Peacock led scheme had already been granted funding and planning permission. Subsequently all that ACSEF/Wood CHOSE to showcase that evening were the 2 or 3 plans completely taking UTG out the equation. The original Peacock design was a complete after thought at this gathering... but Blackwood & Wood's knowledge of the parking space potential in a flattened UTG, strangely, was not!
jaco skinny
Report this comment

Council announces 600 job cuts and continues squandering money on this process. It's quite insane. That there are councillors that still want to spend 100 million on this beggars believe. The value of the gardens are that they are quiet and what some might call underused. Does every inch of downtown Aberdeen have to be crowded shops? That Ian Wood can expect his development to be subsidized with 100 million taxpayers pounds and still has the audacity to spin it as altruism is unbelievable.
Alan Craigie
Report this comment

This is just another example of Aberdeen withering away like an old man. Aberdeen is a disgrace:1/ close all public pools, 2/close the ice rink, 3/ close all libraries and 4/concrete over the only green space left in the city centre. Ian Wood is an old man on a crusade to create a legacy for himself in the only way he knows how. A bombastic project bulldozed through using nothing but unhindered power and influence. Unfortunately his chosen legacy will reflect his personality: a dull grey space. Ian Wood is a disgrace to himself. And Aberdeen City Council is a disgrace to Scotland.
Liam Cody
Report this comment

Perhaps the public consultation will give the good folk of Aberdeen the opportunity to suggest that this square's "content" could become the world's largest crazy golf course. It mirrors the Trump scheme in so many other ways (apart from the fact that Trump is contributing the entire cost of his scheme rather than the small fraction Sir Ian Wood is offering, the rest to come from us and his good friends in business, I wonder who will contribute more) that this would seem entirely appropriate. That, or perhaps an enormous roaming herd of white elephants, foraging the vast concrete savannah of the former Denburn Valley.
Ellis Croft
Report this comment

Perhaps the public consultation will give the good folk of Aberdeen the opportunity to suggest that this square's "content" could become the world's largest crazy golf course. It mirrors the Trump scheme in so many other ways (apart from the fact that Trump is contributing the entire cost of his scheme rather than the small fraction Sir Ian Wood is offering, the rest to come from us and his good friends in business, I wonder who will contribute more) that this would seem entirely appropriate. That, or perhaps an enormous roaming herd of white elephants, foraging the vast concrete savannah of the former Denburn Valley.
Ellis Croft
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.