snp denies five-fold increase in year is valid comparison

Storm over shock rise in repeat sex crimes

By Tim Pauling and Ross Davidson

Published: 27/10/2009

A political row broke out last night after the Scottish Government rejected claims that the number of sex offenders in Scotland who go on to be charged with another sexual or violent offence has increased five-fold in a year.

New figures revealed more than 40 sex offenders were charged with another sexual or violent crime last year – an increase from nine the previous year, according to Labour and the Tories.

The government said the comparison was “simply not valid” and accused opposition parties of failing to compare like with like.

Last year’s figures were disclosed in the annual reports of Scotland’s eight regional community justice authorities, which bring together police, councils and other agencies to share information about sex offenders.

A total of 2,967 registered sex offenders were living in Scottish communities and a further 798 were in jail.

Of the 2,967 offenders, 44 were charged with a further sexual or violent offence.

In Tayside, there were 298 offenders last year, and the number who went on to be convicted again increased from three to four.

The figures show 167 offenders in the Northern Constabulary area and 272 in Grampian in 2008-09. The number convicted for further serious or violent offences went up from one to two in the Northern area and remained at one in Grampian.

Across Scotland, 2,825 offenders complied with notification requirements of the sex offenders register. There were 136 breaches, 47 fewer than the previous year.

Tory justice spokesman Bill Aitken called for stricter monitoring of sex offenders.

He said: “These figures are worrying. It is well-known that sex offenders have a propensity to reoffend.

“Those being released under licence should be monitored very closely, and those convicted of this type of offence should be released on licence only in exceptional circumstances.”

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill claimed the reports show the effectiveness of joint working and demonstrate that when sex offenders breach their conditions, they are dealt with swiftly.

He said: “It is encouraging that the reoffending rate last year equates to one in 68 when the general reoffending rate is far higher.

“Dealing with the complex problem of sex offending requires dedicated professionals working together to take difficult decisions in the interests of public protection.”

Paul Martin, Labour community safety spokesman, said: “The increase in the numbers caught reoffending is very worrying and action needs to be taken to tighten procedures and assessments.

“Rather than pledging to do better we have the unedifying spectacle of the justice secretary pointing out that other offenders reoffend more than sex criminals.”

Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Robert Brown said the figures were only the “tip of the iceberg” when all sex crimes are included.

The government said the previous year’s figure included only the more serious categories of offender. A spokes-man said this year’s figures also reflected a broader definition of serious reoffending to match national crime-recording standards.

Reader's Comments

Time they took the gloves off and dealt with criminals more severely. This pussy footing around and using "human rights" are a slap in the face to the victims. Where are their "Human Rights" non existant. Seems like there are too many bleeding hearts wanting to rehabitulate these criminals. Wake up!!!! They don't want it they are quite happy with the way it is. Kid gloves all the way.
Heather Jhurry
Report this comment

the immorality, greed and corruption of the politicians and authorities allows the law to protect the guilty and not the innocent then this is the outcome - this can no longer be solved by man
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

Evidence of corruption leading to sex crimes please Tom. Another of your bald statements with nothing to back it up.
Andrew Buchan
Report this comment

Andrew read the article it’s self-explanatory
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

I already did Tom. Now back up your statement with some evidence.
Andrew Buchan
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.