Plea to council for arts group cash lifeline

By Calum Ross

Published: 23/01/2010

Councillors in Aberdeen have been asked to throw a financial lifeline to an arts group which is embroiled in a battle over the future of the city centre.

Peacock Visual Arts’ plans to create a £13million centre in Union Terrace Gardens could be over next week, unless the local authority agrees to continue its funding.

Aberdeen City Council officials have urged finance committee members to keep supporting the group with £3,040 a month until the end of May.

The move comes amid continuing uncertainty over its plans for a new centre as the consultation continues into Sir Ian Wood’s vision of creating a £140million civic square on the site of the gardens.

The oil services tycoon announced the proposal as Peacock was about to begin work on its new base, which was to be built into the slope of the Victorian park.

Funding from the council would come from the £3million contribution to the scheme which it had already approved but capped, and would pay the wages of one full-time member of Peacock’s fundraising team, and one part-time staff member.

In a report, council arts strategist Lesley Thomson said: “A decision not to continue the funding for the team until the results of the city square public consultation are known will significantly impact on the future of the organisation.”

Opposition Labour group spokesman Willie Young urged the committee to continue backing Peacock.

“There is no guarantee that Sir Ian Wood’s project will be acceptable to the people of Aberdeen because it’s still out for consultation,” he said.

“It is important that the two projects are on a level playing field.”

A spokeswoman for Peacock Visual Arts would not comment last night.

Fraser Denholm, from the I Heart UTG campaign, which has collected more than 5,000 signatures on a petition against the civic square proposal, said: “We shouldn’t be at this stage where the council should have to give Peacock more money to survive.

“If the other scheme hadn’t come about they would have broken ground and the centre would have almost been completed by now.”

Aberdeen residents have been given until March 5 to give their verdict on the way they want the city centre to look for decades to come.

Sir Ian has pledged £50million to turn his city square vision into a reality and has won the backing of city business leaders in the process.

Reader's Comments

i have an idea where you can get money from, stop funding the public consultation into the city square project. simples!
David Officer
Report this comment

Really? Aberdeen City Council are funding the consultation? I must have missed that one, when did they decide that?
Jane Spencer
Report this comment

Jane, last June Aberdeen City Council allocated £40,000 towards the cost of the consultation. This £40,000 is to come from the revenue budget. So why Sir Ian stated as fact on the radio yesterday that the City Square Project will not impact the council's revenue budget, after the allocation of this £40,000, is a mystery. The rest of the cost of this marketing exercise are coming from Scottish Enterprise - again, public money. The full council meeting minutes are here http://committees.aberdeencity.gov.uk/Data/Resources%20Management%20Committee/20090616/Agenda/Union%20Terrace%20Gardens%20and%20Denburn%20Valley%20Feasibility%20Study%20and%20Next%20Steps%20Subject%20to%20the%20decision%20of%20the%20Policy%20and%20Strategy%20Committee%20on%209%20June%202009.pdf
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Hi, I have just looked at the pages to which you refer and my reading is that the money you are speaking about was allocated to the team which was working with Peacock Visual Arts, I see no mention of the consultation being funded.
Jane Spencer
Report this comment

Hi Jane, on page 9 of that document is the following: 6.5.1 Phase 1 of this project, which has just concluded, has been led by ACSEF utilising internal and partner organisation resources. For the project to proceed into Phase 2, Aberdeen City Council’s contribution would be £40,000 already allocated from the revenue budget for 09/10. Personnel contribution will be ongoing input at Chief Officer level as part of the ACSEF Sub Group, as well as three days per week project management resource, which can be provided from the Major Projects Team within current staffing resource. Support from other ACSEF partners is also being sought.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Jane, the above copy and paste refers specifically to the city square project, and has no bearing on peacock at all (other than to jeopardise their existing funding arrangements through delay). That Sir Ian Wood states his vision will have no impact on the ACC revenue budget is, therefore, quite simply untrue. Perhaps Sir Ian is unaware of this fact - I would hope that he wouldn't be so careless otherwise - and therefore look forward to him, and Acsef, retracting their statements to that effect at the earliest opportunity. Perhaps they might also like to apologise to the people of Aberdeen for unintentionally misleading them on this matter. We shall see.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

I was looking at the minutes of meetings where it was agreed to provide around £1500 of funding to the campaign team relating to Peacock for nine months from June 2009, along with a capital grant, which would indicate to me that Peacock have not been completely forgotten by the Council either.
Jane Spencer
Report this comment

This only goes to prove what a complete fallacy of Sir Ian and ACSEF's adamant claims that "The City Square cannot take money away from the council's annual revenue budgets and therefore will not impact on key services such as education, housing, social work and roads." ACSEF, a Forum supposedly devoted to Economic Development, in pursuing this City Square mess are effectively bleeding dry a small arts organisation with a desire to expand and give more to the city of Aberdeen. Surprising considering on the BBC Radio debate that the first point, put foward by a board member of ACSEF and answered firstly by Sir Ian was about "safeguarding Small Businesses."This only goes to prove what a complete fallacy of Sir Ian and ACSEF's adamant claims that "The City Square cannot take money away from the council's annual revenue budgets and therefore will not impact on key services such as education, housing, social work and roads." ACSEF, a Forum supposedly devoted to Economic Development, in pursuing this City Square mess are effectively bleeding dry a small arts organisation with a desire to expand and give more to the city of Aberdeen. Surprising considering on the BBC Radio debate that the first point, put foward by a board member of ACSEF and answered firstly by Sir Ian was about "safeguarding Small Businesses."
Fraser Denholm
Report this comment

The £40,000 that the Council report refers to is not a contribution specifically towards the City Square consultation. It is infact Aberdeen City Council's annual contribution towards ACSEF. Other partners in ACSEF - such as Scottish Enterprise and Aberdeenshire Council - make similar contributions to ACSEF on an annual basis. Exactly how these resources are deployed within ACSEF does not constitute direct funding of any intiative on the behalf of a partner. If you followed that reasoning, then it could be argued that the City Square Project consultation is being funded by Aberdeenshire Council. The only real support provided to the City Square Project is the personnel commitment by ACC, as stated. But this is understandable given that it is exactly the remit of staffing teams such as the Major Projects Team to investigate usages for City resources such as land. The City of Aberdeen has not funded the City Square Project consultation. ACSEF has done that.
Eric Blair
Report this comment

Thanks for clearing that up, Eric. So the council has not contributed to the public consultation, ACSEF has. With, er, money from... oh, wait, Aberdeen City Council.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

OK I'm confused. Can someone clear this up as I may have got this wrong: We currently have a privately funded public consultation, which is being run by a private PR company who were employed by ACSEF who are in turn funded by the public purse on one Private Businessman's vision. Can you see my confusion? Am I missing something?
John Rutherford
Report this comment

Actually Eric, I beg to differ, the report states specifically that the £40,000 is "sufficient contribution for Phase 2 of the fuller ACSEF project" ACC already give £229,000 to ACSEF for 09/10 which includes the wage of the Development MAnager, seconded to ACSEF from ACC. They also recieve financing from Scottish Enterprise and Aberdeenshire Council.
Fraser Denholm
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.