Rivals use words of Bard to taunt SNP over bill’s ‘failure’

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 26/01/2010

The controversial bill which could give Scotland the chance to vote on independence is expected to be cleared by the Scottish Cabinet today – paving the way for it to be sent to parliament.

First Minister Alex Salmond celebrated the birth of Robert Burns with school pupils in Aberdeen yesterday – the day his political opponents had expected the Referendum Bill to be published.

The SNP leader, however, said his party was focusing on getting the Scottish budget passed first before returning to its flagship independence policy.

He denied the government was looking to launch the bill yesterday, saying it was only speculation that January 25 had been selected as the “early 2010” previously set out.

Labour claimed the Gordon MSP was “running scared”.

Speaking at Cults Academy, Mr Salmond said the bill will go before the Cabinet today and is expected to be lodged with Presiding Officer Alex Fergusson within weeks.

He added: “Matters are very far advanced.”

Labour leader Iain Gray used some of Burns’s most famous verse to attack Mr Salmond last night, saying his failure to publish the bill yesterday “exposed” him as a “sleekit, cowrin, tim’rous beastie”.

“After all the hype and millions of pounds of taxpayers money, the SNP’s failure to launch their bill is a sign of their incompetence and that they are running scared,” he said.

“The question for first minister is ‘O, what a panic's in thy breastie’. Like his other flagship policies, the bill has run aground. Poll after poll shows there is no support for separation. The great majority of Scots do not believe now is the right time for a referendum and know the SNP want a rigged question.”

A spokesman for the first minister hit back, saying that Labour’s position on the referendum had become “utterly farcical” following Wendy Alexander’s now infamous “bring it on” call.

He said: “We said that we would bring a referendum bill forward early in 2010, and that is what we will do.

“We are extremely confident of taking our case for independence and equality for Scotland to the people – while Labour and the other London parties are running scared of the people’s verdict. The vast majority of people want to extend the responsibilities of the parliament far beyond the Calman Commission recommendations, and the watered-down version of Calman published by the Scotland Office, so that we have more powers to do more for Scotland.”

Reader's Comments

Is hard to ascertain who is more pathetic, if Mr Fudd Grey with his "Jack-in-the-box" attitude, triggered by any tremor of the weathervane, or His Most Excellent The British Consul in Scotland r Skeletor Murphy and his £78.000 Millions Britain has been so generous as to donate to Scotland in return for our Oil. As can be read in the Caledonian Mercury, the brand new online Scottish paper. And we are going to suffer this till the 6th of May? Heavens have pity on us!
Vincent McDee
Report this comment

Calenonian Mercury???? Another SNP propagand. 78,000millions donated to Scotland for our Oil. So why is it our oil???? Is it in North Sea??? is it on the coast of Britain??? What makes you believe that we should get the same money as say Birmingham or any other large city. These cities have more population in them that the whole of Scotland. Maybe we should be able to get more say in decisions, but independance No Way. That is for the fanatics. Look around the world and see what happens with these fanatics. Blinkered, biased one sided attitudes. To demand more money for "our oil" Does it stop at the Borders. Is it on land in Scotland. What next.?? No matter what the SNP and ALex Salmond says. The money he is wasting on his pathetic referendum would be better spent on getting more things done for the people instead of his posturing stance to waste more money. Is that why the SNP want more money - to pour it down the SNP drain.
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

Good photo of the court jester,
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

Whenever I watch First Minister's Questions, I'm always reminded of the Bard's "sic a parcels o' rogues in a nation". The Gray man should always remember that Burns wrote "Scots Wha Hae", not Land Of Hope And Glory". Likewise Mrs. Doubtfire Goldie and Tavish Who equally fight under the unionist rogues banner. The late and much-missed Margaret Ewing used to say that there should be only one question on the Referendum ballot paper,viz.: "Are you for Scotland, or are you a sh--?" (The last word had the same sound and meaning as "Brit").
Stuart West
Report this comment

minnie moan a lot--nom de plume as ridiculous as your posts
JAMES MURRAY
Report this comment

Sorry James if they don't come up to your standards. Sticks and stones as they say. Thank goodness for freedom of speech, even if it is not always what you want to hear. Is that all you can contribute to the comments page??
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

For Scotland to prosper, it must be in charge of its own affairs.
Tam Glen
Report this comment

Can we get some decent polititians first please.
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

"Can we get some decent polititians first please." Every country in the world complains about that Minnie! Britain is a diverse country, with different needs for different parts of that country. When it come to Scottish independence, what we need to ask is, "Are some bunch of anti-Scottish tories more capable of running Scotland than the people who live there and understand the needs and the problems of Scotland." The simple answer to that is NO, NO and yet again NO. If you want to see what the tories will do to Scotland when they come to power, just look at the comments sections of the, "Daily Telegraph," and "Daily Mail." Has the leopard changed it's spots. NO!!!!!
The Truth
Report this comment

Minnie, can you write some sense please? In the mean time......... This is why I vote SNP and look forward to the day Scotland that runs it's own affairs. "London is one of the world's great cities" Kind of not surprising given the level of investment channelled into the British Capital and the rest of the South East, including the portion which is spun as a Scottish "investment" : . £30 billion subway upgrade program see - tinyurl.com/6sxrgv . £5.9 billion on one London railway station see - tinyurl.com/6yheht . £16 billion For another London rail line see - tinyurl.com/yphdwl . £1 billion to upgrade an existing railway station see - tinyurl.com/5sn8mm . three quarters of a billion on a Dome ! see - tinyurl.com/6h6ezn . Followed of course by yet another London regeneration project £5 billion see tinyurl.com/5l3jp3 . £6 billion Channel Tunnel Rail Link see - tinyurl.com/4pg53n . £2.5 billion -Roads just around the Docklands in London see - tinyurl.com/55wh6b . £3.2 billion For Another Tube line see - tinyurl.com/5qjoao . £1 billion improvement to an existing Light Rail Line see - tinyurl.com/6q2424 . £20 billion for a Second Thames flood barrier planned see - tinyurl.com/5uf79a . A £4 billion greenhouse tower over Batersea power station see- tinyurl.com/6ac8hn . £9.3 billion for the Channel Tunnel - see tinyurl.com/6s4vsb . £4.3 billion for a 5th Heathrow Terminal see - tinyurl.com/2h5hx6 . £5 billion Upgrade other London airport upgrades see - tinyurl.com/5oe82n . £10 billion Plans for Heathrow link to Channel tunnel see - tinyurl.com/568dzq . £13 billion for a third runway Heathrow runway see - tinyurl.com/3bgdtt . £9 billion for Brown's plans to transform Thames Gateway see - tinyurl.com/4kr3pt . £18 billion London Olympics ( including £200 + million stolen from the Scottish Lottery) see - tinyurl.com/olympicscam The London Olympics is just another example of Scotland building up the infrastructure of the South East and British Capital, and of course we are told the breadcrumbs we will get will be sufficient for us. 2% of the contracts Scottish companies are currently getting is hardly even a breadcrumb - see - tinyurl.com/3jbu2d So just what benefit is Scotland going to get from the London Olympics. From the official Economic Impact analysis of the London Olympics (see tinyurl.com/6my6gp ) we have : "The implication of this is that for the rest of the UK (excluding London), London 2012 will have a negative impact on GDP of c.£4 billion caused by the displacement of resources and activities towards London." "A change in the number of businesses created is also forecast and implies a considerable negative impact to the rest of the UK (excluding London) resulting from business closure or displacement towards the London economy." "Again this implies a huge negative effect on jobs in the rest of the UK (excluding London)" And this report was before the massive and obscene cost over runs from the original estimate of £4 billion to now at least £14 billion see - tinyurl.com/6p43bv Additionally £200+ million has been taken from the Scottish lottery. see - tinyurl.com/6pyd43 On top of all that the "positive" impact we are told the games will means that it counts towards Scotlands expenditure in the latest GER Report and will do so in subsequent GERS reports !! As of course do our involuntary contributions to Trident, The Iraq War, etc. see - tinyurl.com/6m9lsm Scotland is just being treated with absolute disdain and likely the most we will get out of this that our begging for breadcrumbs from the masters table might, just might mean we recover a small portion of our "investment". Scotland needs to be rid of these British parasites as quickly as possible.
alan reid
Report this comment

And how about this waste of space that Scots are forced to contribute to - "Jack Lemley, the last man to run London’s Olympic Delivery Authority — which is spending the budget — has said that London’s final bill could be a dire £20billion. " "Extravagant: No amount of money is being spared on building the stadium" and what will happen with the latest White Elephant of inefficiency - "the 80,000-seat stadium is its post-Olympic future — or ‘legacy’, as Lord Coe likes to call it. Once the Games are over, most of the stadium will be torn down to leave a 25,000-seat athletics site. " "The Government is begging us to believe that the bill will not go any higher." Of course out sycophancy of our Brit Nat comrades ensures they will believe any spin from the proven liars in Westminster - talk about unbelievable naivity. And also as reminder of one of many other White Elephant tributes to the British Capital "the £750 million Millennium Dome was a good example of what happens when wishful thinking by grand public committees shunts commercial realism aside." see - tinyurl.com/dyx2za " impact on other parts of the 'country'" So just what impact is Scotland getting from the London Olympics. From the official UK Economic Impact analysis of the London Olympics (see tinyurl.com/6my6gp ) we have : "The implication of this is that for the rest of the UK (excluding London), London 2012 will have a negative impact on GDP of c.£4 billion caused by the displacement of resources and activities towards London." Why should any Scot sacrifice a single penny on areas like child poverty, health care, police, education, creating jobs in Scotland, instead of having the monies annexed to subsidise London yet again ? Perhaps the Brit Nats can tell what great benefits Scotland is getting from having our monies used for the London Olympics rather than being spent in Scotland for the benefit of Scots first and foremost ? I'll give you guys a clue we do not regard the following plan as a benefit - A useful FOI release highlights the lies within this Union. A while back there was a denial of any plans to dump huge amounts of toxic waste for the London Olympics in Scotland. Again just lies, this FOI release makes it clear that substantial planning has occurred to dump up to 36,000 tonnes of toxic waste from the London Olympics in Scotland. see - tinyurl.com/ce2jz4 Union dividends galore :) 2012 Olympic games to top 20billion ? William Hill believe there is every chance the the final official cost of the 2012 Olympics will top £20billion. With the government currently insisting that the cost will be £9.35bn, Hills have opened a book on what will be the final official cost of the London Olympics as confirmed by the government, and they offer 16/1 that it will come in at under £10bn. Hills offer 4/6 that the final cost will be between £10bn and £20bn, and quote 11/10 that it will soar to over £20bn. Hill's spokesman Graham Sharpe said: "With several years still to go it seems highly unlikely that the government will be able to keep costs down to under £10bn and in all likelihood the costs will continue to rise significantly. "We think there is every chance that it will eventually more than double." 16 Jan 2009 Steve Norris, the former Tory transport minister who is a key member of the Boris Johnson mayoralty, has admitted that the London 2012 Olympic Games could cost nearly £20bn.Independent - 19 Oct 2008
alan reid
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.