Labour wants sleaze probe into row over fundraising lunches

By Katrine Bussey

Published: 09/02/2010

HOLYROOD’S sleaze watchdog has been asked to investigate the first minister and deputy first minister as the “cash-for-access” row continues.

Labour wants Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Stuart Allan to look into the matter and establish if the MSPs’ code of conduct was broken.

The move comes after lunches with Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon in the Scottish Parliament restaurant were sold at auction to raise cash for the SNP.

It emerged at the weekend that other lunches had been auctioned as fundraisers for the party, with supporters having bid a total of £12,500 to dine with Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon at the parliament.

Mr Salmond has now cancelled the lunches and said no money was received in advance.

He has also called for clarification of guidance issued by the Scottish parliamentary corporate body that states: “The parliamentary campus should only be used for events relating to a member’s parliamentary duties.”

A Labour spokesman confirmed that a complaint had been delivered to the standards commissioner yesterday.

The complaint calls on him to investigate whether the MSPs breached the part of the code of conduct that states MSPs should not take part in any event if they are aware “that the organisers are promoting the event on the basis that those paying to attend the event are buying influence over MSPs”.

Labour leader Iain Gray has already said it is “disturbing if the first minister thought he could routinely sell private meetings to raise funds for the SNP”.

He said: “It shows a complete lack of respect by Alex Salmond for the integrity of the office. This sort of grubby behaviour is totally unacceptable.”

An SNP spokesman criticised “Labour’s confusion on the issue”.

He said: “The parliament’s corporate body has already been asked by Mr Salmond to provide a ruling on the use of the restaurant because they are the body responsible for parliamentary resources.

“In any event, by definition, since no lunches have taken place, it is impossible to argue that anything has been misused.

“The lunches were planned for the parliament restaurant, which is a public space where journalists and all pass-holders can book a table, so the notion of private access is by definition absurd.”