Annie Lennox hits out at architectural ‘vandalism’

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 09/02/2010

Singer Annie Lennox has entered the row over plans to redevelop Aberdeen’s Union Terrace Gardens – describing Sir Ian Wood’s City Square project as architectural “vandalism”.

Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Futures (Acsef) wants to raise and build over the gardens to create a civic square.

The £140million project has been suggested by the Wood Group chairman.

But the scheme has run into opposition from campaigners who say it would mean destroying the green heart of the city.

The opponents include Peacock Visual Arts, which had full planning permission and was preparing to start work on a contemporary arts centre built into the slope of the gardens.

Now 55-year-old Miss Lennox – who has been an outspoken critic of recent development in the city she left as a teenager – has said Aberdeen needs the Victorian gardens, not more concrete.

She said: “Aberdeen was my home town. I was born there, and lived in the city until I was 17. For me, Union Terrace Gardens was, and still is, the green historical heart of the city.

“Like so many towns and cities all over the country, Aberdeen lost a great deal of its architectural heritage and charm through destruction by bulldozer and concrete.

“I hoped that this kind of ‘vandalism’ had peaked in the 60s and 70s, but for Aberdeen, it seems to be back with vengeance.”

The Eurythmics star added: “I’ve been based in London since 1971, so I guess that kind of counts my voice out – but to the citizens of Aberdeen I would say this.

“Aberdeen is your home town. Are you going to sit back and do nothing while its beautiful historic centre gets ripped out and concreted over? It’s down to you to stop this happening.”

However, Tom Smith, chairman of Acsef, said Ms Lennox’s near 40-year absence from the city made her views somewhat irrelevant.

“Acsef has repeatedly stated that the City Square project aims to create a new civic space and gardens with an iconic arts centre as its centrepiece,” he said.

“It is about elevating the gardens into the sunlight and creating a green and attractive destination using the natural topography for relaxation, play, discovery and enjoyment for all the citizens of Aberdeen and to attract new business, investment and tourists.”

He added: “We will be happy to show Ms Lennox our proposals so she has these facts.

“Ms Lennox has been based in London since 1971 and will not have seen for herself the degradation of our city centre, particularly the woefully under-used gardens.

“Sir Ian is an Aberdonian who lives here and has pledged £50million of his own money towards this civic project to transform our city centre because he is totally committed to ensuring the region’s long-term prosperity.”

Reader's Comments

Another opinion on the city from someone who no longer lives here. Let the people who live and work in the city decide what's best. If you don't find the city and area good enough to live in don't offer ill informed decisions on what's best for everyone else.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Another opinion on the city from someone who no longer lives here. Let the people who live and work in the city decide what's best. If you don't find the city and area good enough to live in don't offer ill informed decisions on what's best for everyone else.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Mr Cook, I live in Aberdeen but commute to Manchester to work, weekly. Is my opinion not valid either then? Personally I think that somebody who has seen a lot of the world, might have a useful opinion to add.
Ian Stewart
Report this comment

On the one hand Acsef want to attract national and international tourism and investment, the city square being the driver of this - the catalyst for positive change and presenting the Aberdeen of the future. On the other, they attack folk who aren't from Aberdeen, or have left, for not knowing anything. Is this the same Acsef that wants to attract international architects to design a new Guggenheim? And all that international investment? By accusing anyone who disagrees with their solution of being ignorant, particularly if they're not local? The sheer wrong-headedness of Acsef's position grows daily. One day the square is salvation for the disabled, the next it's not flat and will follow the natural topography of the Denburn valley. One day the square is the only hope for Aberdeen's economic future, the next it's a civic space (perhaps Acsef don't understand the difference between a civic space paid for by the council and a commercial area that generates economic value?).
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Alisdair you may want to read the column again where she already states she no longer lives in the city:..... "The Eurythmics star added: “I’ve been based in London since 1971, so I guess that kind of counts my voice out – but to the citizens of Aberdeen I would say this." etc....
Keith Stirton
Report this comment

This issue is up for the people who live and work in Aberdeen to decide. Not those who were born here and are now famous. Same as the bypass, same as the golf course. Let the people who are affected by these decisions have a say and listen to them. Simples.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

This issue is up for the people who live and work in Aberdeen to decide. Not those who were born here and are now famous. Same as the bypass, same as the golf course. Let the people who are affected by these decisions have a say and listen to them. Simples.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Alisdair Cook should inform ASCEF of his opinions. These are the guys taking their so called consultation out to Inverurie and Peterhead. Does their opinion count more than Annie Lennox, whose father after all used to be the lord provost of the city?
mike shepherd
Report this comment

Well done Annie! You don't have to be living here to know that ripping out your green heart and history is bad for business. Crikey… did Tom from ACSEF just say they're using the natural topography? How desperate can you get! To claim that putting a 4/5 storey concrete building into Union Terrace Gardens uses the natural topography is both hilarious and sad. The only way ACSEF's proposal uses the natural topography is a foundation to dump all their concrete on. What dubious source of information did I get my misinformed view from? Actually, it's from ACSEF's feasibility study on their own website along with the 2-storey multi-carpark. Even the City Square Project website states it's raising the gardens to street level. And we're still waiting to see anything resembling a decent argument that paving UTG and not any other part of the town centre keeps Aberdeen as a world class Energy City. Maybe it's because of all the energy we'll consume to build this mutli-storey concrete monstrosity?
Brian Christie
Report this comment

I perhaps should have used the term "use the city regularly" to keep the "literal" brigade off my back. I don't want to hear people go on about what's best for the city when they don't use it. I don't see why people get upset by the notion of it being more important what local people think of these plans (ie those who regularly use Aberdeens facilities and whose lifes are impacted by the decisions made regarding the city) is far more important than an AWOL celebrity.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

I perhaps should have used the term "use the city regularly" to keep the "literal" brigade off my back. I don't want to hear people go on about what's best for the city when they don't use it. I don't see why people get upset by the notion of it being more important what local people think of these plans (ie those who regularly use Aberdeens facilities and whose lifes are impacted by the decisions made regarding the city) is far more important than an AWOL celebrity.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Well bully for Annie Lennox, who left Aberdeen as soon as she could and hasn't deigned to be back since, if the Gardens are that wondeful Annie you could have used them for a concert.But neither the Gardens or the citizens of Aberdeen are really of much interest for you. I suppose any publicity is better than none.
Sandra black
Report this comment

Alisdair, if the city square is intended to attract national and international tourism and investment, surely the opinions of folk who currently DON'T use Aberdeen are highly relevant? How is it possible to claim that Aberdeen's economic future and international stature are dependent upon this city square whilst at the same time dismissing any contrary opinion on the basis that, er, it comes from outwith the city? Only last week Acsef were proclaiming the benefits of an international competition for a "new Guggenheim", and now they're telling us that non-local opinion is irrelevant. The contradictions in Acsef's pronouncements grow wider on a daily basis. None of them support the case for the removal of Union Terrace Gardens or the creation of a new city square; they are merely papering over the ever-growing cracks in their proposition. Which, in truth, amounts to nothing more than the prize of a £50m pledge - there is simply nothing more to their proposal than the realising of this pledge.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Just as ACSEF will jump on an opinion contrary to theirs as will the pro-garden lobby. There is plenty to support the civil square proposal, as there is for improving the existing gardens. Any argument that completely ignores potential benefits of the other is ill-informed, weak and rash. Each ahs pros and cons and those who wish to brand the opposing option as "nothing" do very little to strengthen their position.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Alisdair Cook, if you want to, you can discredit anyone's opinion for any reason, you will always find one. Whether it's that they no longer live here, or that they werent born here, there will always be something irrelevant to pick up on.. for instance, i think your opinion shouldnt count because you spell your name with a D instead of a T.. you also say 'simples' a lot which makes you a russian meercat, so you can't realy have a valuable opinion.
Ved Mij
Report this comment

Ved, good solid argument backed up by common sense. Congratulations.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Yep, just as good as yours, exactly my point.
Ved Mij
Report this comment

Can I ask everyone who's jumping on my opinion that the thoughts of those who use the city's facilities is more important than those who live hundreds of miles away say whether they are pro gardens or pro civil square? I would hazard a guess that if it was someone living abroad and never returning to the city on a regular basis voicing their opinion for the civil square a different tune would be sang here.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Can I ask everyone who's jumping on my opinion that the thoughts of those who use the city's facilities is more important than those who live hundreds of miles away say whether they are pro gardens or pro civil square? I would hazard a guess that if it was someone living abroad and never returning to the city on a regular basis voicing their opinion for the civil square a different tune would be sang here.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Can I ask everyone who's jumping on my opinion that the thoughts of those who use the city's facilities is more important than those who live hundreds of miles away say whether they are pro gardens or pro civil square? I would hazard a guess that if it was someone living abroad and never returning to the city on a regular basis voicing their opinion for the civil square a different tune would be sang here.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Can I ask everyone who's jumping on my opinion that the thoughts of those who use the city's facilities is more important than those who live hundreds of miles away say whether they are pro gardens or pro civil square? I would hazard a guess that if it was someone living abroad and never returning to the city on a regular basis voicing their opinion for the civil square a different tune would be sang here.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Alisdair, you've just said the same point i was making, that it is so easy to discredit an opinion, and yes it works both ways, or whichever way you want it to. I personally value Annie's opinion much more for the fact that she's been detached from aberdeen long enough not to have been tied into any power clique, she is giving a personal genuine opinion and it should be valued. As for my opinion, it has been made over and over by so many others, that the civic square project is a pharse in all it claims to do, that it is not feasable for the stated sum that doesn't exist, that it goes against the city's planning policies, that it is being forced on aberdeen by a lobby that pay no attention to anyone else, and that the idea of it is one of the worst things to happen to aberdeen, as it is likely to destroy the one chance the city had to get a truly remarkable piece of architecture that would transform both the gardens and the city. A project that has gone through a rigorous competative process, design and planning process, has gained it's funding and was about to start, but is now put on hold due to unsubstantiated 'visions'. 'Simplies' enough for you?
Ved Mij
Report this comment

people who live overseas can vote(apart from me) so surely someone can talk
bob seivwright
Report this comment


bob seivwright
Report this comment

Ved, would you be as passionate about Lennox opinion if she was pro-civil square.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Also, I have noticed all everyone does is attack the civil square idea. Surely the argument should not be about how weak people see the opposing proposal, rather how strong they see the one they support? Or are both proposals weak and ones just the better of two evils?
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

Well i certainly did not try to discredit the opinions of Willie Miller, or Richie Ramsey, both of which were pro-square. Instead i stress my contrary opinion, that so many others against the civic square share. The proposal is So insanely vague, and so indecisive, yet it claims so much. And any time a question is raised against it, it defends its arguements by the vagueness and claims that nothing has yet been proposed. Yet when that very indefinity is pointed out, more claims of economic benifits and possibilities are made. it is almost as if this consultation is to stop the peacock project going ahead, so that ACC can then sit down and decide what to do with the square, which will turn out to be unaffordable, or unfeasable, and the city will once again be left with nothing. If Ian Wood came put and said that should the consultation swing completely against the square project, he would then devote part of his promised gift with strings attached to the peacock scheme and truly revitalising union terrace gardens as an alternative, i would buy into his supposed generousity. But now it is clearly an investment oppurtunity for a very select group of business heads and developers, and there is clearly no room or invitation extended to anyone else.
Ved Mij
Report this comment

Tom Smith said the project was about "creating a green and attractive destination", how can concrete be green and attractive, the man's a fool. I'm not surprised people leave Aberdeen and you can blame Aberdeen City Council for that.
James Edwards
Report this comment

Good examples of famous(ish) people supporting Civil Square that you used there, Willie Miller and Richie Ramsay. Both live in the area and have a vested interest in Aberdeen and it's improvement. I would have thought if someone like David Duchovny came out in support of the Civil Square he would be rounded upon by the pro-garden lobby.
Alisdair Cook
Report this comment

People leave Aberdeen because the city is dying on it's feet. I moved back from Canada in 1988 until recently moving down to Manchester for work. I can count on one hand the number of things which have changed for the better during my 20 years in the city. I certainly don't include buliding new shopping centres as a positive step forward. Regardless of which option is chosen or how much is spent, how will this enhance the lives of the people who live there?
Ian Stewart
Report this comment

I am a young adult in Aberdeen. All I've ever seen the park used for is summers day drinking sessions! It reeks of urine and is usually locked in the winter. As it stands, I feel the gardens are a waste of space. If they were to be used by someone for something constructive then I’m all for it. The question is what do you use it for? I myself, along with a lot of people in Aberdeen, have no direct use for an arts centre, however I try not to let that cloud my judgment. I remember looking at the plans for the arts centre and it does take up a good lot of the park, it would also involve knocking down quite a lot of those ‘protected’ trees (I am unsure if these trees are, in fact, protected but I keep hearing the term being bandied about). I also noticed the distinct lack of green in the civic square conceptions (I don’t believe there are any formal plans as yet, only several ideas of what it could be like) which I would be unhappy with. Either way, this space needs to be kept 'green'. I understand there was funding and planning permission for the art centre prior to the idea for the civic square idea being voiced – however, I was unaware that an arts centre had even been proposed! As a resident only a few streets away I was glad to have a chance to voice MY opinion on the use of the area, and I think the new public consultation does that rather well. It does indeed have an option for an arts centre, if that’s what the people want, that’s what the people will get. I must say though, that the idea of raising the gardens appeals to me. I like the idea of sitting in an outdoor café enjoying a drink and some food. So what if there is a car park under the square – Aberdeen desperately needs more parking! I think it would be an excellent move for Aberdeen.
Kelly Smith
Report this comment

Kelly, the City Square Project use the word "raise" to suggest that the gardens will somehow be preserved. The technical appraisal which is now available via the citysquareproject.com website spells out exactly what is involved - the permanent eradication of Union Terrace Gardens. The technical feasability study estimates that approximately 65,000 cubic metres of earth and granite will require excavation (that's 8,500 dump truck movements). Also it concedes that the project involves the removal of all mature trees and all "ecological value" currently associated with Union Terrace Gardens. The documents are a bit lengthy but I'd really recommend that you have a look if you support the city square project. If you believe that the space needs to be kept green, you will want to understand exactly what is being proposed - and it's difficult to equate that with being "green", sadly. The Peacock scheme involves the felling of 12 mature healthy trees - something they've never hidden. It also would prevent any future decking over of the gardens. Ironically there are a number of people who used to oppose the arts centre scheme (because of the inevitable disruption to the gardens its building would cause) who now support it, for that exact reason. Preserving a good, useable portion of the gardens makes the Peacock scheme a price worth paying if it will prevent the eradication of the gardens in the future. Acsef's strange belief that those opposing their scheme are a minority of the "arts community" simply shows how poor their advice is when it comes to public opinion.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

No wonder Annie Lennox chooses to remain outwith Aberdeen. Its a souless dirty looking place, packed full of cheap take aways + pubs. And that is just Union Street. The Union Terrace Gardens could be re-juvenated, to form a super Victorian Green Area that could cater to most tastes. Princess Street Gardens in Edinburgh is locked at night and there are a few groundstaff in evidence during the day, so rougher eliments are detered) However,theres a distinct apathy within the Aberdeen Council to do anything other than to grant planning permission to builders to erect concrete jungles that serve only to further enrich local business men. (Obviously Annie has not got the right handshake)
Frances Martin
Report this comment

Why should the opinions of those who left Aberdeen 20-30 even 50 years ago have any bearing on what should happen to Union Terrace Gardens, how the Gardens were in 1954 and how they are now are poles apart. "people are leaving the city because its dying on its feet" whose fault is that. It certainly isn't the fault of people who have chosen to live here. The future of Union Terrace is the future for our children and grandchildren, not for those who live 100s or 1000s of miles away. Who cares if Annie Lennox never sets foot in the place again, she has shown what she really thinks of Aberdeen by staying away, her tuppence worth now is frankly zero, if she was really interested in the Gardens she would have done as Sandra suggested, hold a concert and raise the profile, but talk is cheap Annie.One reason Aberdeen is dying is the nimby factor, too many people holding it back.
Bill Main
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.