Sir Ian hits back at claims of bullying

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 12/02/2010

Sir Ian Wood has hit back at claims that people are being bullied into supporting his plans for a £140million civic square in Aberdeen, and again warned he could walk away unless the scheme wins public backing.

Earlier this week, fellow oil boss Jim Milne said many felt “pressurised” and “intimidated” into supporting the businessman’s vision for Union Terrace Gardens because of his status.

Sir Ian has offered to give £50million to the Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future (Acsef) project to raise the Victorian park to street level – covering the gardens, a nearby railway line and the Denburn dual-carriageway.

But Peacock Visual Arts had been granted full planning permission for a £13million contemporary arts centre built into the slope of the gardens when the Wood Group chairman announced his plans.

As a result, an increasingly bitter row has broken out over the future of the site.

Last night Sir Ian told the Press and Journal that he still intends to withdraw his financial backing if the majority don’t want the square.

He said: “I remain totally committed to this project as I firmly believe our city centre must be transformed to secure our long-term economic future. However, I have always said that if the public does not support this vision then my offer of funding will be withdrawn.

“Everyone involved in the project takes great exception to any insinuation about people being pressurised to support the City Square.”

He added: “With regards to Mr Milne’s comments earlier this week, I totally respect everyone’s right to express their view and he has expressed his.

“There is however always a danger when one individual claims to speak for others. The consistently positive feedback we have been receiving from the business community is at odds with his statement. Our primary focus since launching the public consultation has been to ensure that as many people as possible participate. This is a singularly unique consultation exercise that allows everyone to shape the future of this city. My plea is that everyone gives their opinion – for or against – after studying the facts.

“If they support it then the consultation allows them to shape the project. This is a region of 450,000 people and only about 1% have participated to date.

“If people are supportive, then the consultation allows them to shape the next stage. At this stage, it is wide open as to how the new space could look and feel.”

Pop star Annie Lennox, who grew up in Aberdeen, joined the debate this week, saying the people of the city should stop historic green space being “ripped out and concreted over”.

Sir Ian rejected those concerns, however. “My real disappointment is over the confusion and misinformation in the public domain,” he said.

“Acsef and I have repeatedly stated that this will not be a flat, concrete square with shops and a car park. This is a new civic space and gardens with a contemporary arts centre at its heart that will make the city greener, more attractive, safer and better connected. My other concern is the perception that it will never happen through lack of funding or that the money required will impact on vital local services.

“Again this is simply not the case. The city council will not be funding this project. The private-sector money leveraged on the back of my personal pledge will unlock the key to public funds only available for major infrastructure projects. If we don’t apply for these funds, other cities will.

“Over the years there have been several schemes to redevelop this strategic, central location. All have failed due to lack of ambition and lack of money. This time we have the money and I would hate it to fail simply because we do not have the ambition.”

Last night Mr Milne, chairman and managing director of the Balmoral Group, said he has had people congratulating him all week for “standing up and saying what had to be said”.

He added: “I was at Subsea today (Thursday) and dozens of people came up to me and said ‘well done’. Not one person told me I was wrong.”

Reader's Comments

You're not bulling anyone but it's your way or the highway. It's a strategic site but this PR exercise, sorry, public consultation, is only about your options. There was a 3rd option in the feasibility study but you're not supporting that so it was dropped. Your square wont be flat but the area has to be raised to street level. The technical detail shows a 4 storey building with 2 storey car park and roof terrace but it will be greener than the existing 200 year old park. It will be safer, how? just because you build something? There are numerous areas in the city centre that need strategic infrastructure development. It's sad that you cannot support the Bon Accord Quarter Masterplan that ACC proposed 5 years ago that was so well received by the public, or rejuvenate the Castlegate or the Green. These are all areas of significant history and huge potential. You made reference yourself to previous attempts, who knows better than you as you've been behind a few of them. You can't make a lame duck fly no matter how much money, ambition or good will you throw at it. If these are your conditions then as an Aberdonian, I'm happy to say No Thanks! Please exit as soon as possible, close the door behind you and let the council and public create a heart in the city that we can all be happy and proud of.
Brian Christie
Report this comment

— "Sir Ian has offered to give £50million to the Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future (Acsef) project to raise the Victorian park to street level" No, he has offered £50million for ACSEF to see through his vision under quite strict conditions. He repeatedly claims this is purely for Aberdeen's benefit but if he really cared then why tie the offer to only one possibility without compromise for schemes already given approval in the same area?
Ryan Roberts
Report this comment

The only bullying being done is by those who are against this development. The various threads on this website prove this, name calling, sneering at the opinions of those in support of it. The bullies thought they would win against the Trump golf course, well they didn't.
Sandra black
Report this comment

It's truly fascinating to know how Sir Ian can dangle this huge carrot JUST for his scheme and not offer any compromise or look to develop other areas as part of a wider Aberdonian renaissance.. BAFFLEMENT has taken on a new meaning. Let's hope the public meeting on the 18th Feb sees a new tact from ACESF/Wood before, like Wood threatens, his dosh becomes unavailable.
jaco skinny
Report this comment

Sandra, that's an utterly unfair thing to say and comparisons with the Trump development are entirely misplaced. I suggest you take the time to look thoroughly into the original Peacock proposals, the timing of the Wood project announcement and the views of the well-respected supporters who are opposed to the City Square project AS IS.
jaco skinny
Report this comment

Let me get it straight: 1) Wood's £50 Mill. 2) Unknown, but private money (which we don't know if will require or not a profit) in sufficient quantity to trigger official help. 3) "Public funds only available for major infrastructure projects". ==== £140 Mill. Did I get it right? Few questions: Can we have the private supporters names please? Can we have the minimum amount necessary to trigger the official support? Which Government or Quango will provide the rest? Who will be in charge of the proyect? Will the budget be as accurate as the Edinburgh's trams? Et Caetera. Till these and many others are not answered the Square is still a poisoned chalice/dangling carrot. I totally agree with Brian Christie above: OUR WAY OR NO WAY.
Vincent McDee
Report this comment

Hi Sandra, i'm really sorry you feel that way, but the fact of the matter is there have been a MINORITY of people on BOTH sides whom have resorted to name calling, sneering & bullying tactics on these pages. Also to imply that those who opposed of the Trump scheme are the same people who oppose this development is more than a little misleading. I can see where the Trump Scheme will benefit this area and as such had no objection to it. I can see where Peacock's scheme will benefit the area, an estimated economic benefit to city of £5m per year, a genuinely quantifiable revenue stream these are facts! I can see no such benefit in the City Square plans, and the fact ACSEF/Wood seem unwilling to provide any had an hard & fast figures is very telling, they only want to deal in opinion and conjecture, with a view to "run down the clock" on Peacock's funding from the Scottish Arts Council or with a view to putting them out of business all together! Again i urge you to go and see the Brisac Gonzalez at Peacock's - their plans are brilliant and visionary without destroying 200 years of this cities heritage. We're in real danger in ending up with nothing and a large proportion of the blame must land at ACSEF and Mr Wood's door. http://www.peacockvisualarts.com/archive/251/what-if One last thing: i am not an artist or a member of the art's community, i am from, live and work in Aberdeen, i do go to Union Terrace on occasion. Just thought i'd make that clear before someone has a go! : )
Graeme Smith
Report this comment

Not bullying but the flexing of muscles through wealth. Most businessmen do not reach the status of Sir Ian without having a ruthless streak. This is being shown through the pushing of THE CITY SQUARE PROJECT. What is the point in creating a new civic space when the rest of the city centre is in such a sad and tired state? Easier to get from one shopping centre to the other we are told will help to rejuvinate Aberdeen. I beg to differ. All this will do is cut out Belmont Street and the only remaining part of Union Street that still has a half decent footfall... Another area in the city centre to die a slow and painful death due to the blinkered vision of the money men, who at the end of the day are the only ones who stand to gain from the C.S.P.
Kenneth Flavill
Report this comment

To accuse sir Ian Wood of bullying over the city square project is unfair, a heavy-handed approach yes, but bullying no. Having a clear objective in mind, he has taken a business-like approach in putting his project into effect. This attitude has made him millions in the oil industry and is to be applauded. Unfortunately for him, this is not a clear cut business project as the public are involved in the issue. We do after all own the park that he would like to build on and there are certain sensitivities involved that wouldn't be the case in his normal business dealings of providing a service to oil companies. He has a clear vision that this development is needed to sustain an energy sector in Aberdeen. It is difficult to see how the presence or absence of the city square would make the slightest bit of difference to whether big oil stays or goes, but right or wrong he does sincerely believe that it does matter. He fails to understand that many if most Aberdonians would like to keep the gardens and don't understand why they should be sacrificed before the altar of big business.
mike shepherd
Report this comment

"""He fails to understand that many if most Aberdonians would like to keep the gardens and don't understand why they should be sacrificed before the altar of big business. mike shepherd""" What I dont understand is why the many dont use UTG, I have my own business and travel widely, many civic squares the world over are places to be proud of, why are the "many" objecting to a much needed improvement to an area long ignored by the "many". Appears to me to be an objection to Sir Ian Wood more than anything else. I have "many" friends/neighbours and they are all for this scheme. I would take Jim Milnes claim if everyone at Subsea being in agreement with him. I certainly didn't.
Bill Main
Report this comment

Bill, I met sir Ian recently and discussed the city square project with him. He graciously accepted my objections as the heritage argument and I was quick to accept his arguments for the CSP as sincerely held even if I strongly disagree with him. There was nothing personal on either side. The heritage argument is less about how the gardens are used, although the shameful neglect of the park by the council is something that everyone would agree on. It is more that the gardens are beautiful and are in harmony with the wonderful granite buildings of the city. A steel and concrete square would be be utterly out of place in my view. Unlike yourself, I have met many who agree with me on this.
mike shepherd
Report this comment

Hi Bill, nobody's objecting to improvement or Sir Ian and his generous offer, but that's not what's on offer here. The City Square project offers destruction, with no clear goal and no clear longterm financial or social benefit to this city, that is what "many" object to. I urge you to go and see the Brisac Gonzalez plans at Peacock's - their plans are brilliant and visionary without destroying 200 years of this cities heritage, whilst providing a genuinely quantifiable revenue stream for the city, surely a win win situation. ACSEF/Wood and their supporters seem determined to paint objectors to their scheme an an overly emotional minority who are taking this personally - i'd say the reverse seems closer to the truth.
Graeme Smith
Report this comment

they say as we get older we degenerate back to our childhood - crying babies always get what they want - so why should Sir I Wood be any different
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

I get fed up with this "why don't people use the gardens?" rubbish. I do! Lots of people do! Why don't we use it at other times? Well ACC has removed all the facilities due to lack of funding, no toilets, no bandstand, no regular events. The last event I can think of was Tartan Day, Aug 2009 and the garden was packed. ACC advertised it as "See music, comedy and dance performed in the tranquil surroundings of Union Terrace Gardens". Do you need to rip them out and put in a 4 storey concrete building to fix this? No, you don't. And why should we be more proud of a civic square, which you can find in any city in any part of the world, as opposed to a unique green valley and park, which can only be found in Aberdeen and has defined how our city centre has grown? I don't doubt there are many civic squares around the world that are great to be in, I've been in a fair few myself and enjoyed them all. There are some really good ones in Rome. But how many of their residents would happily give up the last significant green space in the city centre, when 500 meters down the road there is a 70's eyesore which waiting to be demolished that would open up two of the most historically and architecturally rich buildings in the centre, just to create a civic square?
Brian Christie
Report this comment

Typing too fast, that was meant to say "any sunny day the gardens are full of people. Why don't we use it at other times ..." etc.
Brian Christie
Report this comment

I think that sir Ian forgot he called Fraser Denholm and Katie Guthrie "cowards" for not backing his vision at last years "Tiger Tiger" launch of the re-animated from the 980's "city square". And having the delight of hearing Dave Blackwood speak to "you lot" (artists) - whilst watching him roll his eyes and humpf because we "keep asking daft questions" - retorting with "you just don't understand" kind of makes me wonder what this article is all about? - polarised? I wonder why? - I just want tangible answers that make the CSP stack up against the previously approved and backed and costed and evalutaed by ACSEF - peacock Visal Arts building. Asking the same questions over and over again - but, we've still not had any solid answers because "the public will decide"... which begs the question - how do they know it's going to be what they say it will be?
Philip Thompson
Report this comment

The bullies thought they would win against the Trump golf course, well they didn't. This comment would be hilarious if the results of the Trump development were not going to be so destructive. I follow many of the posts on this website too and see virtually no evidence of 'bullying'. I do see people like S. Black who have no structured case resorting to ill argued 'blurtings'. I don't think anyone takes them very seriously though. My suspicion is that Mr Trump is unlikely to be the victim of anyone's bullying.
Mike Miller
Report this comment

When I first heard about the Wood plaza, I was totally opposed to it, on the grounds that it would destroy our well-loved little bit of greenery in the centre of the city. However, like Graeme Smith, I can see real merit in the Gonzalez plan to cover over the road and railway only, while retaining the gardens. Compromise perhaps, but half a square would be better than no gardens.
Stuart West
Report this comment

I believe Jim Milne, it's a pity that Mr Ian Wood can't see beyond his ignorance and self-importance, as he appears ever more by the day.
Sean Ashley
Report this comment

ACC shouldn't be wasting money studying this at this time. How about producing a balanced budget rather than the annual 30mil cutback before squandering money on projects they don't have funds to advance. Asking taxpayers to fund a 80 mill subsidy for Ian proposal is ludicrous. Somebody needs on ACC needs to develop some common sense.
Alan Craigie
Report this comment

I wonder if Tom Smith is feeling a bit silly after slating Annie Lennox - when the CSP have used her photo in their booklet? http://ryanr.eu/dump/city-square-annie.html
Philip Thompson
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.