City Square brochure will be scrapped

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 16/02/2010

A glossy brochure for Sir Ian Wood’s City Square plan in Aberdeen which features pop star Annie Lennox is to be scrapped.

The businessman has offered to give £50million to the Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future (Acsef) project to raise Union Terrace Gardens to street level.

Earlier this month, Ms Lennox claimed Aberdeen had already lost too much of its built heritage to bulldozers, and that the city should not give up the gardens.

She said the people of the north-east should stop the green space being “ripped out and concreted over”.

It has since emerged that a picture of the former Eurythmics singer was included in the consultation brochure which describes the project.

An image of her in concert is used to highlight the idea that the square could be used for outdoor music events.

Last night, the City Square project team said the brochure was being “phased out” anyway and replaced with a more informative production. Ms Lennox said her so-called endorsement was “ironic”.

She said: “They clearly assumed it would be fine by me, as it makes it look as if I’m endorsing their vision – when I wasn’t even asked, they just went ahead in any case.”

Nicola Moore, who is running the City Square consultation, confirmed the document was being withdrawn.

She said: “As part of the City Square vision we see a space that could be used for a host of public events, including an area that would attract world-class performers.

“We would be delighted in the future if acts such as Annie Lennox had a venue in the city centre of Aberdeen that they could play in.

“We certainly didn’t intend to suggest that Ms Lennox supported the City Square project, we used an image we thought showed the type of venue that the new civic space could host.

“As it happens we are naturally phasing out this brochure.

“It has been replaced with a new, more concise leaflet which addresses some of the questions that have been raised during the consultation.”

The City Square consultation’s next stop will be the Peterhead Leisure and Community Centre on February 27.

Aberdeenshire councillors were given a special session with Sir Ian yesterday afternoon at Woodhill House, Aberdeen.

The businessman talked members through the plans before answering questions.

In a separate interview, he also hit back at some of Ms Lennox’s claims.

“In Annie Lennox’s young days, Union Terrace Gardens probably was very different to how it is now,” he said.

“I would ask her to come and see how under-utilised it is and the unsightly views there. It is a real architectural blight.”

Reader's Comments

"“I would ask her to come and see how under-utilised it is and the unsightly views there. It is a real architectural blight.” I don't know what gardens he's talking about. I was in over the weekend and it was beautiful, peaceful and a nice break from the hussle n bussle of Union Street. I parked in the Denburn carpark and got access via the side of HMT - you know, the disabled access part that ACSEF seem to deny exists. I think more people need to get in the gardens to remind them what a gem it is, and what a travesty it would be to lose.
Philip Thompson
Report this comment

I'm no fan of the city square proposal but I don't see what it has to do with Annie Lennox. As someone who has done nothing but bad mouth the city since she left she should perhaps keep her opinions to herself
Keith Middleton
Report this comment

I'm no fan of the city square proposal but I don't see what it has to do with Annie Lennox. As someone who has done nothing but bad mouth the city since she left she should perhaps keep her opinions to herself
Keith Middleton
Report this comment

Frankly it has as much to do with Annie Lennox as it has to do with all the other "worthies" who have been shooting their mouths off in favour of it. Most of them have never even been in Aberdeen at least she was born here.
Dave McGregor
Report this comment

Looks like Nicola Moore is now suggesting that the square could be in competition with the Exhibition Centre for a venue that would attract "world class entertainers" The good folk of Aberdeen are already having to prop up the Exhibition Centre. Doesn't ACSEF think that this existing white elephant needs every help it can get? It certainly can't afford any competition. I think this shows us that ACSEF are clutching at straws to grab the money for Union Square and will make up any story. I find it hard to beleive if someone sicererly wishes to donate money for the bettterment of the city that they can not be persuaded to look at other ideas.. In fact for someone with a "vision" it appears to be a bit short sighted... perhaps a visit to Specsavers may be called for >>> :-)
Keith Stirton
Report this comment

So Aberdeenshire councilors were given a private session with Sir Wood. Trying to brain wash more councilors. AS for the talks in the Citadel. That will be a fix as well. I was under the diallusionment that Sir Wood was a man of integrity. Well it seems not. To undercut an already agreed project which is miles better than any drawing that ACSEF or himself can come up with. This was diry underhanded and is blackmailing the city and council with his £50 million. If the council and ACSEF go with this it shows how deceitful and immoral they are. I find nothing worthy in the Wood project nor the man himself for coming in at this late time with his inglorious "Vision". When the journalists can do some real journalism and write about the other proposal, then we might see some creative thing done in our garden. Not this glossy brochure with a few drawings and everyone looking sun tanned. It is the most hideous piece of work ever created. Then again they say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. As said above. Should have gone to Specsavers. Everyone is so scared of Sir Wood and his millions. If he really cared for Aberdeen he would invest in the AECC. That at least would be a worth cause.
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

Keith, Acsef have repeatedly stated that the City Square will be a civic, not a commercial space. This presumably means that any concerts taking place within this civic space will be paid for from council funds. But not revenue funds, as Acsef flatly deny the possibility that their civic space will leach money from the city in such a manner. Interesting to note that the taxpayer is underwriting a commercial space, the Exhibition Centre (quite rightly in my opinion). How a larger space, that apparently won't have a commercial remit, is expected to thrive is something of a mystery that remains unaddressed by Sir Ian and/or Acsef. They will only tell us that it won't cost the Council. And it won't be commercial. Sounds ominous to me. Who will keep the place clean and functioning? Who will be responsible for the fire warrant needed for any concourse and lower floors? We don't know, and Acsef won't tell us.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

A special session with gifts wrapped in old pound notes, with the see you alright message inside!!! All as thick as thieves............... Annie Lennox should return to Aberdeen & give a free concert in the existing gardens, before it disappears under a slab of corruption & concrete forever.
Fiona Cooper
Report this comment

Richard - of course! it's the 490 space car park that will pay for everything. ASCEF documents say it'll raise £250,000 a year (if I recall right). That'll pay for everything! What a sound businessman Sir Ian is - £50m to raise £250,000 a year revenue - 0.5% return
Debra Storr
Report this comment

Debra, I believe that you may be overestimating that stunning return by ommitting the remaining £90m required for Sir Ian's vision to become reality. Well, in whatever reality £140m is sufficient to achieve anything other than a partial shell with no finish or fit-out, and no content. And no air rights over the railway. Oh, and no allowing for purchase of properties on Belmont St that may be necessary. Nor allowing for inflation. Or VAT. Or what it will cost to go through the planning process. Or insurance. The list of exclusions in the £140m is a long one. But it's OK, because under "assumptions" the feasability study says "An allowance of £8,200,000 for the Contemporary Arts building has been included in shell and core form only. The funding of this element we understand has already been identified in a previous scheme." That would be the Peacock Visual Arts scheme whose funding isn't transferable? But let's "assume" it is! And let's call it a "previous" scheme, all the while telling everybody about how central it is to the city square project! Quite frankly what possessed Sir Ian Wood to entrust his vision to Acsef, who appear utterly incompetent, is a mystery to me. Their constant baying about "misinformation", when they commissioned the feasability report which contains the very information they seek to deny (car park, shops, hotels, offices, concrete, reinforced steel, etc) is breathtaking in its contempt for people's intelligence.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Are ACSEF and Sir Ian Wood really going to spend more than the £309,676 of tax payers money they have already spent on thier 'public consultation' by producing another brochure? It seems they have reserved the right to change their minds constantly during the 'consultation' period or is it just that they are not quite sure of the facts they are consulting on?!
gabrielle reith
Report this comment

£309,676.00!!! Surely not. Their budget for the consultation (as set by ACC) was £40 000.
John Rutherford
Report this comment

""Fiona Cooper"" you know for sure that there is bribery going on do you.? Several posts accusing those business people who want this project of bribery and corruption have been made on this website. It says a lot for the naysayers if this is the level of their argument. Sir Ian Wood has brought £millions into Aberdeen in the way of employment, he has more right than anyone commenting on here on this subject, he certainly has more right than Anie Lennox who has brought nothing to Aberdeen, other than the fact she was born here. The eedjit thinks that Scotland could set a global example for what a small country could do. What planet is she on.
Sandra black
Report this comment

> ""Fiona Cooper"" you know for sure that there is bribery going on do you.? How about £50Million worth of bribery? Oh wait no, that's a "gift"… in order to see through support for his vision.
Ryan Roberts
Report this comment

What else do you call a bit of bribery if not a bit of corruption. Sir Woods "Gift" comes with quite a lot of stipulations. My way or nothing being the main one. If as he says he is only interested in the well being of the city, he would compromise and build his "Civic Square" where the remains of St Nicholas house will be. That will leave the gardens free for the original passed plans with less financial burden for the city and the tax payer. As for Sir Wood being so great and beneficial. Please do not forget that he did not build up his empire from fishing to oil for the benefit of the city but for himself. Iif Aberdeen has got something out of it - great.When a "Great Man" such as Sir Wood can sabotage an already planned project with his bribe ( Oh sorry GIFT" ) and say a bit of corruption then what do you call it. Notice that Stewart Milne siding with it. Of course, he will need parking space when his offices are finished. As for ACSEF they cannot say the same thing two days running. NO there is no car park, then - the Car park will pay for maintenance etc. Even the drawings and consultaions are a bit of hog wash. Once Aberdonians agree with Sir Wood scheme them they will decide what to put there. Speak about cart before the horse. Their idea of mature trees is certainly not what you would see in any park. even if the Ben Reid boy says so. This project is a total fiasce, lies and deceit. The £50 million of Sir Wood would vanish just by the engineers having a look and the total work estimated. And we all know what happens then. We would be paying for ever more. At every turn the ACSEF try to intimidate any comments against their plans. The Market traders and the Union Street Retail organisation are all jumping up and down with anticipatiion of all the retail outlets going to happen. Again IF Sir Wood was a man of integrity and his millions a gift - he would build his square on Broad Street. But as we can see he is a selfish and arrogant stubborn man who is aciting like a small child wanting all his own way. The sycophants to feed this ego should be ashamed of themselves. Are you ACSEF
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

"Sir Ian Wood has brought £millions into Aberdeen in the way of employment, he has more right than anyone commenting on here on this subject" Sorry Sandra but democracy doesn't work like this, well it shouldn't. He has exactly the same rights as everyone else it's really that simple.
Lino Richie
Report this comment

Well Lino So he has the same rights as everyone else. Ok fine. But do we have the same rights as him. No way. we can't go waving millions about to bribe our way into getting what we want. So he brought more employment. Don't fool yourself it was for anyones good apart from his own. Don't owe him a thing. And if that excuses is blatant selfish ego and bribery then you are in a sorrier state than him be so deluded.
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

Well Lino So he has the same rights as everyone else. Ok fine. But do we have the same rights as him. No way. we can't go waving millions about to bribe our way into getting what we want. So he brought more employment. Don't fool yourself it was for anyones good apart from his own. Don't owe him a thing. And if that excuses is blatant selfish ego and bribery then you are in a sorrier state than him be so deluded.
minnie moan a lot
Report this comment

My My minnie, you really do have a touch of the sour grapes. You also seem to have a personal vendetta against him, wasn't good enough to work for him is that it. I kinda get that idea from your bad grammar. An awful lot of people have roofs over their heads because of him. And Sandra is right, he has more right even in a democracy than Annie Lennox has to mouth off. He took the risks in business, he has put millions into Aberdeen by various ways and means, she has done nothing. No one in their right mind would offer £50 million without their being some stipulations.
Abbie Mann
Report this comment

Annie Lennox has done a lot for ethical issues without ever seeking reward. I admire her even more for speaking up for Aberdeen, ACSEF didn't even have the politeness to ask for the use of her image.
Sean Ashley
Report this comment

It’s clear to see from the majority of the comments on this page that the people of Aberdeen don’t want the ‘’Civic Square’’ built. Sir Ian should read what the majority of people are commenting about and realise that most people don’t share his dream. He has created a lot of jobs in Aberdeen, but if not him then there would have been plenty other companies that would have gladly stepped in and picked up the work... Annie Lennox has the right to her opinion even if she no longer stays in Aberdeen (its called democracy) and just because Sir Ian has more money than the average Joe dose not give him the right to a greater say. All Sir Ian’s supporters are saying that the 50 mil is not bribery, but if you are sitting on the fence as I am then it certainly looks like bribery.
Robert Horne
Report this comment

Who is going to foot the extra 90Million to get the job done? Give the space free of charge to a company like NCP on the understanding it is not taken fully to street level, and covers over the railway, and road, it can create access from all directions, but leaves room to create gardens, peacock visual arts get the area they need and leave some open space for small events like markets etc. A garden stlye amphitheatre. No need for woods money. Hate the attitude if its not going to be done my way, im going to sulk and take my money elseswhere! Great do it then, GO AWAY!
Mr W
Report this comment

Who is going to foot the extra 90Million to get the job done? Give the space free of charge to a company like NCP on the understanding it is not taken fully to street level, and covers over the railway, and road, it can create access from all directions, but leaves room to create gardens, peacock visual arts get the area they need and leave some open space for small events like markets etc. A garden stlye amphitheatre. No need for woods money. Hate the attitude if its not going to be done my way, im going to sulk and take my money elseswhere! Great do it then, GO AWAY!
Mr W
Report this comment

Easy going Abbie he's not Jesus just rich. That's pretty insulting to the 'peasants' of Bridge of Don, Kintore, Inverurie, Banchory that they would be begging in the streets if he didn't come along.
Lino Richie
Report this comment

Like all the other supporters of the square Abbie you launch into a verbal attack on anyone voicing a personal opinion. To slate someone on their grammar is priceless when you ask a question followed by a full stop and then go on to start a sentence with a conjunction.
Kenneth Flavill
Report this comment

Your comment to Abbie..Lino is priceless.She said he had put roofs over peoples heads, she did not malign anyone in the areas you mention. By way of employment he has put roofs over heads.Sir Ian Wood has made millions, by doing so, the economy of this area has much to thank him for.He employs 1000s of people, that may not make him Jesus but it does make him someone who should be shown a damn sight more respect on here than Annie Lennox, remind me again what she has done for the city of her birth. Oh to be as "educated" as you Kenneth. The comments on here are so far removed from the subject that it isn't worth commenting anymore.
Bill Main
Report this comment

By the way Kenneth the verbal attacks were instigated by others, I hardly constitute Abbies response to minnie as an attack. Accusations of corruption/ blackmail/ bribery /selfish /arrogant were instigated by minnie and Fiona. These attacks Kenneth were launched by the non supporters.
Bill Main
Report this comment

Nice to see you that you felt the need to contradict yourself Bill and contribute further.
Kenneth Flavill
Report this comment

What's the deal with all this forelock tugging and subservience to Ian Wood? John Wood Group plc is a publicly listed company and has been for 10 years now. Ian Wood doesn't own the company and he doesn't employ people. I repeat - it's a publicly listed company. He got his rewards when he sold up - why some people seem to think we should cower in deference at the mention of the guy's name is beyond me.
Louis Balfour
Report this comment

Louis I agree he sold out years ago & it is only his £50M that earns 'scrooge' his respect... Lino wake up you retard. Woody has saved millions by being located near Aberdeen tip. If he's so keen on this grand design, let him pay up in full for the lot, and then we will kiss his hands & feet. At least Annie does commands a better & more educated audience. See you all at this council farce tonight…..look for the naked lady!!!
Fiona Cooper
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.