Battle lines being drawn at town house over £50million challenge

By Calum Ross

Published: 14/04/2010

Politicians in Aberdeen will now take centre stage in what has been billed as the most important civic debate in the city for two centuries.

Battle lines were being drawn at Aberdeen Town House last night after Sir Ian Wood challenged councillors to back the city square project or miss out on his £50million investment.

Opposition Labour group spokesman Willie Young warned the businessman the people of Aberdeen would not be “bullied” into accepting his plan for Union Terrace Gardens.

But council leader John Stewart hit out at Mr Young’s comments, saying the decision was too important for the city to descend into a party political row.

And deputy leader Kevin Stewart said a debate and strategy were needed to map out the future of the entire city centre – not just the Denburn valley.

The heated response to the publication of the results of the consultation into the city square project is the latest stage in what has become a polarised and bitter debate.

Councillors appear to have been given the final say on whether or not the project goes forward, but the indications last night were that they are as divided as the public.

Mr Young said: “If Sir Ian Wood wants to continue with his project he needs to start listening to the people of Aberdeen and stop lecturing them.

“It is obvious they have said no. People are not going to be bullied by him or anyone else.”

The local authority’s ruling Liberal Democrat-SNP administration said it did not intend to take a firm stance on the issue. Instead both parties agreed to leave the decision up to individual councillors when a vote is held on May 19.

A number of Lib Dem councillors are believed to oppose the plans for the city square, as well as some SNP members.

Lib Dem group leader Councillor John Stewart said: “I am quite clear that this is a hugely important decision for Aberdeen’s future and party politics should not come into this at all.

“All I am concerned about is people taking this decision for the right reasons – and that is for the long-term future of Aberdeen.”

SNP group leader Councillor Kevin Stewart said: “This debate is as important as the debate we had a couple of hundred years ago over plans for Union Street.

“We can no longer deal with the city centre in terms of a piecemeal solution.

“In the past this city has failed to come up with a proper strategy for the economic and social heart and we have got to get that right now.”

Reader's Comments

It’s clear how the councilors’ will vote, looks like 50 Mil will buy the vote and to heck with the public and democracy eh.
Robert Horne
Report this comment

Thot the debate had been had....? Sorry, having a damn good rant today. Think it was after breaking my suspension (again) and filling up with fuel yesterday. Made my bleed bile to think that a country that produces its own is the dearest in the world for the consumer! Something's jist nae richt there?
manniewe naename
Report this comment

"Councillors appear to have been given the final say on whether or not the project goes forward" I thought we had just had a public consultation, which was to allow the people of Aberdeen to decide. Which part of "56% against" don't these people understand?
Colin Aberdeen
Report this comment

Aberdeen City Council have already been duped by ACSEF when they granted them the £300,000 to promote their Union Terrace Gardens "vision". This was no consultation if the results are now being ignored.The council want to be asking for the money to be returned so we can have our roads patched. Lets hope the council see sense on Monday 19th.. If they don't this project will cost the city dear in years to come and that is not a great legacy to leave for your children's future. The whole country's debt is bad enought with out any further debt. We need to learn when to draw in the purse strings and I would say that this time has already past..
Lord Lucan
Report this comment

There has always been a political dimension to the City Square project ever since day one. When Ian Wood launched his project in November, 2008 at her Majesty's Theatre, Alex Salmond was in the audience. Alex Salmond was quoted in the Times the next day: 'It is therefore important, indeed vital that the city has a centre, a heart of the calibre which fits the international status.' The SNP along with the Lib-Dems form the ruling group on the council. At the time it probably looked like a no-brainer for the SNP. They could present the City Square Project to the Aberdeen public as a political coup, basking in the glory of Ian Wood's £50 million donation. Not only that, their influence over Scottish Enterprise meant that the so-called consultation could go ahead as a PR exercise to promote the scheme. There was also the political advantage that the other political parties in the council woul be paralysed as they would not want to be seen as scaring away £50 million of investment. It's all gone wrong Kevin, hasn't it. If they had just asked one or two old hands, they would have realised that there is long history of normally easy-going Aberdonians getting very angry about any threats to the Gardens. There is a bit in today's P and J that the council vote on the 19th May will allow the SNP and LibDem councillors a free vote without a party line being imposed. Don't believe a word of it. The SNP councillors will follow whatever Kevin says. Let's hear what that is, Kevin. Tell the public, you represent us after all. I might want to vote SNP in the general election ...
mike shepherd
Report this comment

A decision was earlier taken and accepted funding in place that should go ahead even more so since the public have voiced their opinion, what are we discussing.
bob seivwright
Report this comment

ACSEF said they would respect the public's decision. They have now changed their mind as the consultation was not in their favour. The council are our representatives in local government. They should therefore to listen to the publics voice and that voice said very clearly NO. Mind you, we vote them in, if they don't follow our wishes, we can then just vote them out. Now, with the election underway, is the time to see what they really stand for. Let's hope democracy prevails over profiteering.
Concerned Citizen
Report this comment

Perhaps the City councillors will take due regard to their existing strategies for the City centre? Councillors have a difficult decision - offend big business (and be seen to turn down £50m) or tell the public that they are wrong. Sadly the decision will be taken after the general election so immediate punishment at the polls for parties who ignore the public may not happen. There is an urgent need to regenerate the St.Nics site once it is emptied. That is the location for a City Square - and how fantastic sandwiched between Prosost Skene's House and Marishal College. Perhaps Sir Ian would be a real philanthropist and help realise the existing vision for the City Centre? No - 'cause this isn't about doing good for the city, this is about pet projects and helping realise cash from the redevelopment of Denburn for the cash-strapped city and private developers.
Debra Storr
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.