Letters Page

Published: 28/05/2010

SIR, – I refer to your story (the Press and Journal, May 27) headed “North councillor queries £100,000 Housing Expo cash pledge”.

I must congratulate Highland Councilor Glynis Sinclair for asking whether or not the taxpayers of the Highlands can afford a further £100,000 investment in the Scotland’s Housing Expo exhibition.

I do not think so. We, the taxpayers, are expected to accept cuts in frontline services, to subsidise a private housing fair.

Mrs Sinclair should watch out she does not meet the same fate as the provost of Nairn for speaking out against the self-aggrandisement of the Highland Council’s ruling cartel.

David McGrath,

151 Galloway Drive,

Culloden.

SIR, – The SNP government at Holyrood promised that it would ensure a steady stream of capital infrastructure works with its Scottish Futures Trust. While one might hope that this would manifest itself with dualling of the A9, for example, or much-needed school buildings, to date, The Scottish Futures Trust has not laid one single brick.

What the Scottish Futures Trust has done, however, is spend £1million on wages and £400,000 on consultants. The chief executive of this failed organisation earns £150,000 a year and managed to spend £55,200 on a recruitment agency to employ just nine staff members.

Meanwhile, 90 apprentices in the construction trade have lost their jobs in the Highlands and islands in the past year. What guarantee is that to young people who want to learn a skill in a trade that we know will be needed urgently in an economic recovery?

The electorate might wish to remember this when they see Highland Council's cuts being imposed over the next 12 months. The SNP tells us that it is Westminster cutting our budgets and causing so much upset among residents of old people's homes and users of swimming pools and libraries.

This wasted expenditure on a failed SNP project tells us a very different story, one that I'm sure is repeated elsewhere across Holyrood.

John Boocock,

Barbaraville,

Invergordon.

SIR, – I write regarding the civic square plan for Aberdeen’s Union Terrace Gardens. This is truly beyond belief, and yet another reflection of our times.

We talk about positive change, and yet seem incapable of recognising the difference between positive, life-enhancing, relevant and scaled change and “more of the same” change, based on outdated ways of thinking and development for the sake of development (when all the evidence is that big is no longer right) which dampens the spirit, soul, heart and creative juices of the city.

A democracy? Please see Michael Moore's recent film on capitalism to understand more about the power process that runs behind our decision-makers, it seems in both public and private sectors.

It is a very sad day for Aberdeen to realise that the citizens are not heard, particularly with the vote down to the wire.

There was an opportunity to create something so much more, and it seems that the council has failed in its duty to serve in the best interests of the city and its citizens and, furthermore, to respond to and harness such a positive wave of energy to revitalise the gardens.

Morag Paterson,

28 College Bounds,

Old Aberdeen.

SIR, – I am researching my family history.

My great-grandfather was born Alexander Peddie in 1852, at Burghead, Moray.

Could any of your readers please assist me in finding some more information about my family? I know their history after they arrived in South Africa, but not much before that time.

I am planning to visit Elgin next year and would really like to trace the place where they lived and gather as much information as I can before I head for Scotland.

It has been a dream of mine for at least 40 years to follow in my family’s footsteps and I would really welcome information from sources in Burghead or surrounds to assist me in my endeavour.

Any help would be much appreciated. I can be contacted at the address below.

Brian Munro Peddie,

9 Kiwi Esplanade,

Mangere Bridge,

Manakau,

Auckland,

New Zealand.

SIR, – I saw Sir Terry Leahy’s findings in Tesco’s research of its customers’ opinions on binge drinking – that 70% thought excessive drinking was one of the most serious issues facing the country.

He also revealed that 61% were concerned about antisocial behaviour and more than half believed that the availability of cheap alcohol contributed significantly to the problem.

He summed up: “Commonsense tells us that price is a factor in excessive drinking.”

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon can now add the general public and a leading licensed grocer to her list of respected medical officers, the British Medical Association, public-health and social workers, the pub trade and some influential alcohol producers supporting minimum pricing of alcohol.

Mr Leahy, significantly, also said that price alone was unlikely to change the drinking culture in the UK. He then listed four other steps Tesco would take to try to help the situation.

I have not seen even one suggestion or idea from the main opposition parties or other detractors of minimum pricing to provide a silver bullet, or even a little nut that might help.

Dr J.F. Taylor,

Rosehaugh,

Rhynie.

Reader's Comments

Morag Paterson's letter reflects the views of many in the city. ACSEF and the council couldn't have tried harder to upset public feelings in Aberdeen even if they wanted to. A publicity campaign which tried to pass off a commercial development of a public park as in the public interest. A flawed and biased consultation that still produced a 55% no vote against the city square. Ignored. Arrogant public statements about how Aberdonians didn't understand the city square. A councillor who canvassed the views in her ward (largely against the square)then votes for it. Scare tactic statements about how the future of Aberdeen depends on the square without any discursive analysis to support this. A council who votes out a well-regarded arts project, which they had already given planning permission to. Council documents which propose puting both UTG and Westburn Park into a dveleopment company. The list goes on and on and on ...
mike shepherd
Report this comment

Yes, Westburn Park ...
mike shepherd
Report this comment

From a previous post on this blog from last month: "At a meeting on 9th June 2009 of ACC Policy and Strategy Committee on the agenda was the establishment of a City Development Committee - next Stage. they were discussing ..........."establishing a City Development Company for Aberdeen............quality of investment propositions generated by the city for external third party, public/private and commercial financing, and the ability to champion economic development needs in the development of other strategies. .........external consultants had appraised twelve land assets owned by the Council, with a view to demonstrating the development potential available to the Council through its asset base. The example sites which had been considered were: AECC; BON-ACCORD BATHS; CHAPEL STREET CAR PARK; DENBURN HEALTH CENTRE AND CAR PARK; GRANITEHILL; GREENFERNS; LAND AT CARNIE; LAND AT HAUDAGAIN ROUNDABOUT' ST.NICHOLAS HOUSE; SUMMERHILL EDUCATION CENTRE; UNION TERRACE GARDENS; WESTBURN PARK AND PARK HOUSE/CHOICES. THE REPORT FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC POTENTIAL WITHIN THESE TWELVE."
mike shepherd
Report this comment

The 'Consultation@ or referendum was inadequate and poorly carried out. For a better guage of opinion and exploration of alternatives go to http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=xG1NGyQm%2b9ZysVW7ajjHjHZpabPqXCmNf5142KFcwak%3d
Ranald Cameron
Report this comment

The alternative public consultation vote here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/UTG
Craig Adams
Report this comment

Dr JF Taylor ought to take more interest in the tax avoidance activities of Tesco. The money Tesco accountants siphon away from the exchequer would undoubtedly have a greater affect on enabling the implementation of health policy and care delivery than any transparent PR campaign to cosy up to our new government. Dr Taylor may also be interested to know that, south of the border, Tesco and all of their competitors are involved in a fierce price war as the world cup looms. I'm sure he doesn't need me to tell him what it is that they're all offering at cut prices to football fans...
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Morag Paterson is right; however, I think that certain behaviour exhibited by both the city and shire council since the last local elections will have their consequences at the next poll. Councillors work, apparently, on certain cosy assumptions, such as voters choosing their preferred party with metronomic regularity; a nice low turn-out preserving vote share in aspic and therefore their seats; and that their work is conducted behind a fog of obscurity and dullness that prevents too much scrutiny. We have Messrs Trump and Wood to thank, ironically, for facilitating a situation where thousands of folk in the region have been politicised through the brass-necked behaviour of councillors. Unlike those who tut-tut about potholes, and in far greater number than the groups angry about closures, these people will still be angry come the next election. Councillors who chose to listen to the threats of one voter, rather than the impassioned opinions of thousans, may well have plenty of time to reflect on their mistakes after the next poll.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

I wholeheartedly agree with you Richard Fraser. Those councillors who supported this madness and ditched PVA, along with their colleagues who simply sat on the fence, deserve the wrath of the voters at election time, especially the one who held a public consultation with her constituents, only to vote against their views. Absolutely disgusting!
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

David McGrath, you are absolutely right to question the 100,000£ more to be spent on the Highland Housing Expo, as i understand it, the councillors have claimed this is from existing funds that are within the projects service budget, which is good, and doesnt make it an extra cost. Even if it did though, i'd say it would be well worth it, as this is one of the most exciting projects of its type in the north for a while, and there is such a buzz surrounding it. You have some of the best and biggest scottish architects exhibiting vernacular, affordable and sustainable scottish architecture, all in the one place, some of them all on the same street. i believe it is going to be well popular and that it will easily exceed the expected 30,000 visitors, it has been given much publicity, including an exhibition at the lighthouse in glasgow, and many are well aware of it. I myself look forward to it opening, i'l definately be making my way north to see it. I hope you will appreciate and share the excitement surrounding it.
Ved M
Report this comment

mike, how did that report pass us by when it happened? so they're proposing developing green spaces at UTG, Westburn park, and Carnie(a stronghold for red squirrels already surrouned by development). stunned.
David Officer
Report this comment

Ron, if you're referring to the number of abstentions in the final vote last Wednesday, those councillors (or most of them) were not "sitting on the fence". The final amendment against the motion (to progress the CSP) was a Tory one, which would have seen the CSP being progressed but at no cost to the public purse. The previous round had seen the Labour amendment to progress the PVA scheme ditched by the Lord Provost using his casting vote to both change the status quo and ignore public opinion. Therefore the final vote offered councillors two choices, both of which were predicated on the progression of the CSP. Councillors opposed could not realistically vote for either! However, it is interesting to note that those councillors in favour (bar 7) chose to vote against an amendment that sought to protect the public purse. Perhaps this goes some way to explaining the situation in which Aberdeen City Council finds itself; unelected officers who recommend ruinously expensive and untried finance schemes for speculative projects, combined with elected members who tow the line when big business comes knocking on their doors. I was in the chamber last week, and it was somewhat counter-intuitive to see Labour councillors stood up, pleading for financial responsibility, whilst most of their political opponents appeared quite happy to take a punt at such long odds, without even knowing what they were betting on. If you saw that in the betting shop you'd be pretty worried about the folk concerned. Seeing it from the public gallery, however, engendered feelings of deep anger rather than worry for the sanity of some of our elected members.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

David, the report mike mentions has been qupted a fair few times on the comments pages, you'l also notice it coincides perfectly with the release of the UTG feasibility study, with only three days between them.. which one supports the other?
Ved M
Report this comment

Ron, so many journals have just quotes the 20-7 with 12 abstentions figure without any explanation, leading the public, myself included, to believe it was a csp landslide, with a large number withholding opinion. HAd richard who'd been at the meeting not expleined it a few times, we'd still think that. I thin the summary in this editorial (among other things) is more apt.... http://www.urbanrealm.co.uk/news/2402/Not_much_of_a_union.html
Ved M
Report this comment

Are we questioning the reporting of the local press? Surely not... "Andrew Dixon said he felt the abandoned plan by Peacock Visual Arts was right for Aberdeen, but that his organisation’s prime focus was now on getting the right cultural centre for the city. He maintained he did not back the Sir Ian Wood plan for the city centre gardens." http://www.heraldscotland.com/arts-ents/more-arts-entertainment-news/arts-chief-urges-co-operation-over-aberdeen-development-1.1031032
Michael Hodgson
Report this comment

David there is a great deal that has been happening in council chambers that they are staying quite silent about. I believe the sites identified are called 'Pockets of Market Failure'. These will presumably be handed on a plate to the as yet established (but well on the way) City Development Company, a combination of local business men and councillors. Well, we all know how this local elected body rolls over, perhaps on the advice of senior officials. If we did not have such a partisan local press (who are also in thrall to the Philistines) then Aberdonians would be aware of what is going on in council chambers in the name of 'development'. The local electorate are then presented with a fait accompli. In my view this is scary stuff.
dorothy bothwell
Report this comment

Gee, thanks for that michael, and here we were told that this guy was going to spearhead the CSP forward himself..
Ved M
Report this comment

Re the ACC debate on Wed 19th: at the crucial split vote, 14:14, on Peacock versus the CSP, 11 councillors abstained, 3 declared an interest and one was absent. I still don't understand the 11 'abstentions'. What were they abstaining from? Doing the job they're paid to do?
Alex Mitchell
Report this comment

More widely, there seems to be a systemic failure of decision-taking that pervades ACC. Quite apart from the bizarre decision on Wed 19th to forward the CSP, we have recently seen the near-redundant Union Square mall, the monstrous City Wharf development on Shiprow, the loss of the Castlegate car park and the seriously ugly Radisson Park Inn hotel in Justice Mill Lane. These huge developments are wrecking entire neighbourhoods and changing the face of our city, and not in a good way. How can they just keep on getting it wrong?
Alex Mitchell
Report this comment

You will find this interesting, and i find it a tad disappointing. The CSP lot, have completely bypassed RIAS in organising the competition, probably after Neil Baxter's comments and the RIAS unanimous criricsm of the scheme.. They approached the RIBA bosses down south instaid, and decided to use separate consultants to host their competition. Just goes to show, they will stop at nothing, will take nobody;s opinon seriously. Fair play to RIAS, for outspoken and due criticism, it's probably best that they have no involvement in this anyway.... se below for more.. http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/aberdeen-competition-to-launch-this-autumn/5000341.article
Ved M
Report this comment

Alex, one councillor stood up last week and reeled off a long list of planning debacles that have been inflicted upon Aberdeen. Then the same councillor used that as an argument to support the CSP, more or less on the basis that ACC would have to get it right, sooner or later. One of the most famous definitions of insanity is repeating the same action whilst expecting a different result; those of us in the gallery last week bore witness, disbelieving, to this very definition made real by an elected member. Another councillor stated that he couldn't vote against the CSP "because I don't know what I'd be voting against". Such was the absence of substance. If one pro-CSP councillor had stood up and said "I'm scared of turning down £50m so that's why I'm voting for" he or she would at least have been applauded for a gem of honesty bobbing alone in a sea of effluent.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Richard, sorry, does the above link open ok? i.e its not for subscribers only is it?
Ved M
Report this comment

Ved, why would Scottish Enterprise go to RIAS when they want an international architect to win their contest? Can't have some parochial outfit getting in there, can we? Oh, wait - that was a misunderstanding of course. At least SE have put that one to rest by entirely ignoring the body representing Scottish architects! Phew!
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

http://www.heraldscotland.com/podcasts - Andrew Dixon on the Herald Culture podcast (part 2) saying that the Journals had mis-quoted him... so, it's either rubbish journalism (making up stories to suit the CSP?...) or andrew dixon is trying to row away from his ill advised statements... what do you think?
Philip Thompson
Report this comment

Thanks Mike for the list of proposed sites, I knew I had seen it before but could not find it again. Well they have already made a start. The Bon Accord Baths will be gone soon and the UTG is on the cards. It would be interesting to find out just how this will aid the economy of Aberdeen. I thought that AECC brough in millions of pounds, so why is it on this list. Another park to go, well par for the course now. Park house and Choises, we already know that this council has no regard for the vulnerable. When you look at it all, this council has no regard for the citizens at all. Too busy kow towing to the business people who would ditch them at a moments notice once they get their way. I do get a bit concerned at the amount of land that has been awarded to Stewart Milne. Cannot say there is anything wrong with it, but it surely gets one wondering. What with ACSEF being made up of businessmen, who we know run the city, not the council, they are only lapdogs waiting for their treats.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Here is a working hypothesis. There is clearly a bigger picture than developing the gardens involved here. The council seem to be adopting a policy of growth at all costs, encouraging business to do what ever they want with the minimum of interference. As part of this, you have ACSEF as a publicly funded organisation acting effectively as an influential lobby for business to develop the city. Unfortunately this policy ignores the public interest and is encouraging the council to promote development projects by deficit financing and potential asset sales (UTG, Westburn Park, etc). It is amazing how many controversial projects are under consideration at the moment (UTG, Don crossing, PWR, Loirston ...). The deficit financing means that council services and amenities are being reduced to fund the greater goal. It also means that parts of Aberdeens heritage are being sacrificed in the name of development, something that is clearly unpopular in the city. It is also possible that the growth at all costs policy is being encouraged at a national level. It is curious that Scottish Enterprise were involved in marketing the city square project (the 'consultation') at a cost of over £300,000. Who sanctioned that? The big picture is more complex than this analysis would suggest though. Sir Ian Wood's £50 million seems to be based on a sincere belief that a city square wins a beauty contest versus the gardens. It may be that sir Ian Wood is only a lesser element in a much larger strategy. The whole caboodle could end up as a major impasse in the city between the interests of big business and Aberdonians who deeply value the heritage of the city they live in. What a shame. Wouldn't it just be nice to have a council concerned about running the place competently without getting involved in crazy big ticket projects and selling off the city.
mike shepherd
Report this comment

Thanks phillip, well worht a listen, and passing around..
Ved M
Report this comment

Why are we not hearing about this up here? or is the E.E coming up with a good spin.. I like how the RIAS have called the decision 'a farce'.. http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/daily-news/design-contest-launched-for-controversial-aberdeen-city-square/5216463.article
Ved M
Report this comment

http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/aberdeen-competition-to-launch-this-autumn/5000341.article This says garden on top of underground shopping centre!??? Not commercial huh!
Jaki Sinclair
Report this comment

By the looks of it with the Development Committee still to decide what else gets destroyed, this will just be the first of many that our council will sign off on. Wonder if we will have anything left by the time the local elections come round in 2012.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Ved / Jaki, just read that article and I can't make up my mind to laugh or cry at the last statement... [Malcolm] Reading said it was important it involve local people in what gets built instead [of the Brisac Gonzalez design]. “Consultation and informing the public is all part of it. A competition can be a great healing process in situations like this.” ....Yeah, good luck with that healing process!
Brian Christie
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.