Letters page

Published: 29/07/2010

SIR, – I refer to your excellent piece (July 28) in which you stated that a report commissioned by Aberdeen Airport suggested that developments at the airport could boost the Scottish economy by over £620million over the next 30 years.

Unfortunately, the promised runway extension, scheduled for completion last year, has not been completed. The promised international arrivals hall, although promised for some time, hasn’t come to fruition.

The report speaks of the need for improvements in the transport links in the north-east, highlighting the need for the Aberdeen bypass to be completed as a matter of urgency.

This city and region surely have had enough of reports, surveys and questionnaires and this report is only another mirror image of many other reports highlighting the same scenario, and still we see not on iota of progress on any major investment in long-awaited infrastructure projects.

Surely the report that the decommissioning of North Sea oil rigs is due to start in earnest would get the alarm bells ringing, but no, the penny still refuses to drop and protest groups still follow a negative agenda with regard to the bypass and the government still buries its head in the sand and hides behind the forthcoming legal challenge to the road.

Aberdeen needs leadership more than at any time since the early 1970s or we will face the future of a city left with a parting gift of disused oil rigs.

James Noel,

54 Leggart Terrace,

Aberdeen.

SIR, – Your story (July 27) headed “Future looks bright for capercaillies” reflects the considerable conservation efforts that have taken place in the birds’ stronghold area on Speyside in recent years, and well done to Rothiemurchus and others for all their efforts on this, but do we know that this picture is replicated across the country?

Anecdotal evidence from Perthshire, Loch Lomond and several other areas is that populations have become very fragmented and are now practically extinct in some locations.

The last national census in 2005 was positive, returning about 2,000 birds, but there have been a number of poor breeding seasons since then and the 2009-10 census which took place last winter has not reported yet, although it is understood that this was badly hindered by the very poor winter conditions and may not have been completed properly.

It would be interesting to know when the results of the 2009-10 count will be available so that we can get a picture of how the Scottish population as a whole is doing.

Have we had a net gain or loss in capercaillie numbers since 2005 and has the Biodiversity Action Plan target of having 5,000 birds by 2010 been achieved or not?

Victor Clements,

Scottish Native Woods,

1 Crieff Road,

Aberfeldy.

SIR, – The timing of the Aviemore Half Marathon fits in with the school October holiday, thus allowing more people the opportunity to travel to the area and appreciate the beauty of the Cairngorms.

The creation of the public cycling and walking path, paid for by the Scottish Government, is fantastic and has improved the half-marathon’s route.

The “event public”, as Rothiemurchus Estate owner Johnnie Grant refers (the Press and Journal, July 22) to those of us who take part in events, have as much right as “non-event” public to use the path.

Mr Grant states that the area is overrun with events. I am sure his business benefits hugely from the number of people attracted to the area for these events, either as participants or spectators.

At a time when the government is doing all it can to get people active, it seems outrageous to me that a landowner can prevent the use of a track that was made with public funds.

The “public on holiday” will be far more inconvenienced by having four miles of road partly cordoned off than maybe having to give way to runners and joggers for a few hours.

Clearly there is a safety issue: it is much safer for all concerned if the route uses the four miles of logger track, rather than four miles of busy road.

Joan Munro,

Guisachan,

Black Isle Road,

Muir of Ord.

SIR, – Your correspondent Gordon Casely (Letters, July 27) is not only inaccurate but misleading.

To correct Mr Casely, Steve Montgomery, managing director of ScotRail, did not express delight at the service quality incentive regime results.

For the record, Steve said: “We welcome the significant fall in penalties. It is a step in the right direction, especially with ever-more rigorous standards set by one of the UK’s toughest regimes."

He also made clear: “There is still work to be done."

The regime penalties fell by 17%, despite the worst winter for decades. Our focus on standards and investment in stations and on trains, and developing our staff, will continue.

John Yellowlees,

external relations manager,

First ScotRail,

Atrium Court,

50 Waterloo Street,

Glasgow.

SIR, – A person can be skilled scholastically and or practically.

In days gone by, a degree used to refer to a person who had passed in scholastic exam subjects such as literature, science, theology and so on.

Nowadays, a degree can be given for success in practical work such as hairdressing, playing an instrument, mending a TV and so on.

These accomplishments used to be rewarded with a City and Guilds Certificate for jobs like plumbing and joinery. For work which entailed complicated ideas, the National Certificate was awarded or Full Technological Certificate, both far more practical and useful than the old degree.

Charles W. Brown,

3 Netherwood Cottages,

Banff.

Reader's Comments

James Noel writes: "This city and region surely have had enough of reports, surveys and questionnaires... Aberdeen needs leadership more than at any time since the early 1970s or we will face the future of a city left with a parting gift of disused oil rigs." Well, far from abolishing any future questionnaires, it would be better to stop ignoring the results that are obtained - such as those concerning the discredited City Square Project. Noel James's preference for leadership to consultation conjures up a sinister image of the city being run by undemocratic barons who refuse to listen to the pesky citizen underlings whose views would keep Aberdeen in the dark ages. In short, it conjures up ACSEF.
Runcible the Fatuous
Report this comment

http://www.facebook.com/pages/ACSEF-must-go/142902532389843?ref=ts
Runcible the Fatuous
Report this comment

James Noel, i think you are absolutely right in that the airport and key infrastructure projects should get addressed, long overdue, and you're right all we see is report this survey that.. it just shows that there is no focus in the city, and how easily acc and acsef both get distracted and carried away.. in addition to the airport extention, and other infra structure projects, there are many others, such as the 2005 bon accord masterplan, including the demolition of st.nic's tower, and a new civic square outside marishall college.. all these were pretty popular and meritable schemes, yet they are all being turned away from do that more reports and surveys can be produced on this new CSP pipe dream, and a vision identified as essential by only one man.. By leadership, i'm assuming you mean having the sense to put in the effort into projects that actually Would make a difference, and are achievable, and wanted by the people, and to say no to wasting time and money on more reports on what potential would-be scheme might one day somehow improve something that might not need radical change.. I hope acc do get their priorities right and stop wasting time on this civic square/newgardens/new transport hub/shopping complex/bilbao guggenheim/whatever it turns into next week..
Ved M
Report this comment

Of course, worth also mentioning that a brand new cultural facility like nothing else aberdeen has and many other cities do, was also sacrificied and it was right on the brink of actually going ahead, with most of it's funding in place, including the biggest arts body grant ever awarded to a single organisation and full planning permission for an award winning and popular architect's design.. again, binned unceremoniously, so that the next three years and 1.8million can be spent on reports, competitions, consultations enquiry's, for something that as a concept is a complete non-starter, unpopular, unachievable, unaffordable, and outdated, and will most likely again result in nothing, but a published report result.. maybe that's where the money is for these aspirational leaders.. no focus..
Ved M
Report this comment

wouldn't happen in other cities, dundee got it's dca, and now a new v&a of the north, in addition to money spent on improving the city centre and transport hubs, glasgow got its transport museum, tramway gallery, trongate 103 arts centre, and this week the briggait opened its doors, and still, money is being spent on key urban realm projects.. but na, in aberdeen, why have new civic square masterplan when you can have new hotels, why improve the bus and train stations, when you can build a shopping complex that swallows them and renders them as close to useless as it gets, why have new bridhes when you can get an airport extention, why an airport extention when you can have a bypass, why a bypass when you can get a brand new much needed cultural facility, why a cultural facility when you can have a brand new civic square, and the cycle starts all over again, still with absolutely nothing to show for it, but a report at each stage..
Ved M
Report this comment

yes charles but we all know the difference between the good the bad and the ugly.....
Angus Brown
Report this comment

While Gordon Casely raised valid points, John Yellowlees is right. It is an improving situation. What is needed is for Scotrail to simplify it's fare structure to a "per mile" charge so that everyone is treated fairly, instead of ripping off some customers to benefit others. The walk-on fares for many journeys over 30 miles are excruciating. Much of the problem in the north and north west of Scotland are becuase of lack of investment by Network Rail, about which, Scotrail can do little.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

You have to agree with James Noel. Over the last decade just how much money has been spent on useless consultants on one thing or another. We keep hearing them hyped up, but then Nothing- Money down the drain. Again. All talk no action. The only action that the council has achieved is the destruction of the Peacock scheme, who have to start all over again. More money wasted on consultations that were totally ignored when the result was not what they wanted. Now they intend doing it all over again. Just how stupid can they get. ACSEF were being praised again yesterday in the P & J , by the P & J again on their ideas for the future. All very old hat were on the cards, even before ACSEF existed. I think there is a word for using other peoples ideas as your own. Still ACSEF/Wood are good at that one. Because of them, we do not have an Art Centre, we do not have a brilliant modern but in keeping with the architecture around it building, we do not have the plans for The Civic Square in Broad Street. In fact we have nothing, except the disastours scheme by Wood with ACSEF on his coattails expounding the atrocious "Vision" of the illustious "Generous" Wood. Every other city in Scotland thrives on culture, not Aberdeen, we have a whole lot of businessmen, with no regard for the city or the people, but only for their own profits. When will this council wake up and see what a disaster it is making with their building ideas. Union Square is grotesque, the bus and train station, ruined. Built on one of the busiest streets. And they call themselves visionaires and progressive. Backwards is more the word.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Keep yir tichts on James Noel.
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

Mr Yellowess, you just about CCd Gordon Casely's letter. Duh!
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

acsef and their visions.. like dogs chasing cars... they'd never catch them.. and even if theyn did, couldnae drive them..
Ved M
Report this comment

Tom Smith's visions only extended as far as a football pitch. And if the best civic square he saw on his world travels was in Houston, then he is more to be pitied. But the thing about stupid people is that they are dangerous, and people like him tend to have acolytes who are blinded by what they perceive as power. They lack refinement, and his behaviour at public meetings makes that apparent. They also do not like 'losing' despite the fact that he and his colleagues in Acsef are proven time and time again to have lost the argument. Integrity is not high on their list of attributes to have and as a consequence they will bulldoze their opinions through. Such is the stuff that dictators are made of.
dorothy bothwell
Report this comment

my facebook is worth a spy if u want 2 know about y i never made the ac milan game while back.
Angus Brown
Report this comment

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4999430&id=694075818&ref=mf
Angus Brown
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.