‘SCANDAL’ CLAIM OVER CENTRE FOR HOMELESS at TILLYDRONE

Court fight off as plan for hostel is scrapped

By Catriona Webster

Published: 29/07/2010

Aberdeen City Council has scrapped plans for a hostel for the homeless – just a week after taking itself to court over the scheme.

The troubled local authority will now have to rent flats and hotel rooms to keep people off the streets after its homelessness crisis reached a new low last night.

The legal battle between two council departments over plans to create the hostel at Tillydrone was branded a “scandalous” waste of public money after it was announced it would be abandoned.

Objectors to the Aberdon House plans welcomed the council’s decision to pull out last night and criticised the distress caused to pensioners and children as young as eight who were served citations to appear in court.

Housing bosses launched the court action after a decision by councillors in May to refuse a special licence for the proposed unit at Aberdon House. More than 132 people objected to the proposed hostel and were invited to appear as witnesses in court.

The council now says it will address the growing problem of homelessness by housing people who are sleeping rough in private flats.

It also proposes to convert the former St Fittick’s Hostel in Torry into accommodation.

Homelessness prevention initiatives, including a mediation service for young people having problems at home and support for those struggling to pay their rent, are also part of the plans.

Housing and environment convener Aileen Malone said last night: “The Aberdon House proposals were always intended to be a short-term fix to solve some of our homelessness issues, but our officers are now making it clear that we can make progress more quickly, more cost-effectively and longer term by concentrating on these alternative plans.

“Following the detailed assessment of the alternative proposals, including the use of St Fittick’s, I am more than satisfied that this is a commonsense solution. The building needs minimal investment to make it fit for purpose and can be delivered in a short time.”

Deputy council leader Kevin Stewart said: “We have statutory obligations to deal with the homeless situation. This is the only statutory obligation we have in terms of housing and it is our number-one priority.

“I think the agreements we have come to today will go a long way in relieving the difficulties that we have.”

However, he admitted that it was likely the council would still have to use hotels and B&Bs to house homeless people. St Fittick’s, a former hostel for ex-offenders, currently has only 14 beds.

It was revealed earlier this month that the former Oakbank School is also being considered as a potential site for a new homeless hostel.

Last night, campaigners against the Aberdon House hostel welcomed the announcement, but criticised the council’s decision to pursue legal action.

Council taxpayers are expected to be left with a £15,000 bill for the court proceedings.

Aberdeen Central Labour MSP Lewis Macdonald was among the objectors and was also cited to appear in court.

He said: “I’m delighted that the threat to Aberdon House has been removed. I take the view this appeal should never have been made. They put three generations of families though unnecessary stress and distress.

“I’m very pleased that they have realised that their position is an untenable one.

“It was a complete waste of public money, a scandalous waste.

“All the credit goes to the local community because they stood up and wouldn’t allow themselves to be bullied.”

He added that he “regretted” the decision to close St Fittick’s and feared that putting vulnerable homeless people up in flats “will not solve the problem”. Tillydrone Community Council chairman Ross Grant said families had been caused unnecessary stress by the court proceedings.

“We are extremely pleased with the decision but it is coming a bit too far down the line for our liking,” he said.

“It’s a shame that so much money was wasted on the Aberdon House appeal, which did not benefit anyone.

“It didn’t benefit the pensioners and children and the 132 people who received citations and it did not benefit the homeless either.

“We hope that the council will now move on, see sense and progress with addressing the homeless issue more constructively.”

The council came under fire from Sheriff Colin Harris last week. He said the case belonged more in the “realms of politics than the law”.

He threatened to dismiss the action at a hearing at Aberdeen Sheriff Court.

Next month, a similar battle will convene in the courts after housing chiefs lodged an appeal against a decision last year by licensing committee members to refuse a licence for an existing council hostel in Crown Street.

The pending closure of the hostel prompted the council to prepare plans for Aberdon House, which it was hoped would help address a severe shortage of temporary acco-mmodation for the homeless. The council is currently in breach of housing laws bec-ause of its lack of accommo-dation for homeless people.

Reader's Comments

Great now I'll hae tae go tae Torry or Northfield tae get a bit of gear.
JOCK MACTAVISH
Report this comment

The homeless receive a stigma that they are all alcoholics and drug users, this is not the case. This situation has to be addressed, i understand the residents of Tillydrone objection, the council have to do their job and solve the problem by either renovating old properties, or building a new hostel in a non residential area, this is what they are elected for, not wasting 15,000 pounds. We have an obligation to look after those who for whatever reason cannot house themselves, we should not just be worried about ourselves.
bob seivwright
Report this comment


bob seivwright
Report this comment

Aberdon House was always a non starter. But if St Fitticks, "needs minimal investment", why was this not done instead of wasting £15k in court costs?
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

How wasteful for a council to run up costs to sue itself. why was this decision to use St Fitticks not done in the first place. Another cockup by the council. Lets sue ourselves. How many empty flats in the city anyway, Go round any housing scheme and you can see quite a few. Why are these not being used to house the homeless. Or is this the same old story, One department not liasing with another. More than likely the housing dept say they have none. But go to another dept and they can tell you how many empty flats and houses, waiting to be rehoused. Can this council do Anything right.
minnie mo
Report this comment

yeah, its a mad mad mad mad world. Monty python sketch here.
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

If it was a Monty Python sketch, would you believe it could happen??? No you would believe it was all made up by some scriptwriter. Only in Aberdeen can this happen. Bring on the fools
minnie mo
Report this comment

On department, two department, 3 department 4. There are indeed many more departments that never speak to each other until bitterness ensues. Then legal challenges then pointless nonsense, then more. The Council are up their necks in corporate boxing routines. The Council are running nothing apart from running out of cash that is. Sue Bruce is being told what to do, Gordon McIntosh, is puppy dogging it, and John Stewart and Kevin Stewart and Fletcher spend a little too much time either in the pub or at the Exhibition centre when maybe they should be grasping the challenge to actually run the Council responsibly.
roger fontain
Report this comment

What i'm frustrated about is that I said in January that this would never work, if ACC actually take the time to listen to people, it would have saved so much of the communities resources, time and effort, £15,000 (at least) in wasted tax payers money, and Council staff wages, hours and efforts. ACC will hopefully have learned a lot from this experience. Yes it is a victory for the objectors, and a victory for democracy, but the homeless remain homeless and perhaps the problem would be a lot closer to being dealt with if ACC had listened to us from the start.
Ross Grant
Report this comment

Now that this council has thrown away more money - they apparently excel at it - and nothing has been resolved - where do they go from here re the homeless in Aberdeen? Oakbank School? - not a chance. If the residents objected to offices being built there, they are certainly not going to accept a hostel for the homeless. They will, of course, be backed up in this, by Cllr. Cormie, Cllr. Corall and Cllr. McCaig - all of whom waxed lyrical about the heritage of this city (as an excuse for refusal) when the plans for the office development came before council on the 30/06/10. So much so, that I thought Cllr. Corall had a change of heart and was advocating leaving UTG alone, instead of being able to catch a train from the gardens to Dyce (does he stay there?) Wrong, he was talking about the Oakbank Site. Now while the Oakbank site is pretty I didn't realise that it was a notable heritage site in Aberdeen unlike Union Terrace Gardens. Alice in Wonderland and the Mad Hatters Tea Party on LSD is what is happening in this city. It gets crazier by the day, but while all these things may be a distraction it is worthwhile watching what sneaky moves may be happening in the land heist.
dorothy bothwell
Report this comment

Keep an eye on ACSEF they are up to something, a bit too quiet, so something is bubbling away at the "Board Meetings" or Club House. They do not instil much confidence in the general public. they bring to mind something of a very scurilous nature, blotting away in their cosy den. Wonder if our Sue is still invited to join in and add her valuable tuppence worth. This lot along with ACC get more outrageous every week. One wonders just what else they can think up to make Aberdeen a bigger laughing Stock than they have managed so far.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Aileen Malone is a disgrace and one of the biggest freeloaders in the council.
James Strachan
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.