MINISTER LEFT RED-FACED WEEKS AFTER MAKING SYSTEM COMPULSORY

Radio link opposed by firefighters goes silent

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 30/07/2010

The Scottish Government’s £40million communications system for fire brigades has crashed – just weeks after officials took legal action to make its use compulsory.

Community Safety Minister Fergus Ewing took unprecedented steps last month to make sure all fire service vehicles were equipped with Firelink radios, despite resistance from senior officers in Grampian.

The Press and Journal can now reveal that the new system has already failed because of a software problem – leaving all eight brigades in Scotland on a backup network last night.

The digital radios are the main link between control centres and the fire engines and cars sent to tackle blazes and road accidents around the country.

The technology was developed after the 9/11 and 7/7 terrorist attacks in New York and London, when mobile phone networks went down.

They allow all emergency services to communicate directly with each other, no matter what the location.

However, at 3.30pm on Wednesday, all of Scotland’s fire and rescue services, including Grampian, Highlands and Islands and Tayside, were cut off from the network.

Technicians from Airwave – the communications firm behind Firelink – have been working since then to try to fix the fault.

It was five hours before some brigades were connected to the back-up systems on Wednesday.

A fire service source, who is not being named to protect his job, said: “Interestingly, our mobile phones – which were much criticised by civil servants – were the only thing that kept the service going at the height of this latest crisis.

“This is a catastrophic failure of what we’ve been told is a resilient radio system on which the safety of Scotland depends. It is a very serious matter and I think politicians and the people have a legitimate right to know about what has happened.”

It is understood a crisis meeting was held between fire chiefs, the government and other emergency services as technicians battled to get brigades on to the back-up network.

Crews in Dumfries and Galloway and Lothian and Borders were able to connect up quickly but the other six brigades had to wait until 7.30pm to get on to the substitute network.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “All services have full voice and data capability and currently using back-up systems pending some technical checks. Once complete, all will move back to the main system.

“This is the most advanced communications system in the UK and, unlike many older systems, Airwave is designed to be resilient, with highly effective back-up systems in place for any eventuality.

“As such, the advanced back-up system kicked in, ensuring that communications and operational capacity were maintained.”

A spokeswoman for Airwave said: “On Wednesday, a technical issue within the Airwave infrastructure resulted in some of our services being unavailable.

“An Airwave incident team has been working closely with our customers to restore the full service as soon as possible.”

It is understood that a number of Strathclyde Police control rooms have also been affected by the system failure.

Opposition politicians reacted angrily last month when it emerged that Mr Ewing had taken legal action to adjust the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005.

The minister said he had been left with no choice but to force Grampian Fire and Rescue Service to fit the system so it fell in line with Scotland’s seven other brigades, ensuring the entire country was covered by the new communications network.

Grampian’s chief fire officer, David Dalziel, had blocked installation of the system in the 24 private cars of senior managers on the grounds that the equipment is not hands-free.

West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MSP Mike Rumbles said news of the breakdown was embarrassing for the government – and once again called for Mr Ewing to back down over the row.

The Liberal Democrat said: “As far as operational matters are concerned, fire chiefs know what they are talking about and ministers should not interfere and force through their own will.”

North East Conservative MSP Alex Johnstone said: “Obviously this is embarrassing for the minister since he pushed so hard for Firelink.

“I hope the minister will now take the time to reflect on some of the alternatives put to him and whether his confidence was misplaced.”

Reader's Comments

Well thats what you get when you put all your eggs in one basket. There was nothing wrong with VHF and didnt fall over.
Mr W
Report this comment

"Radio link opposed by firefighters goes silent" - This headline and much of the article (whether through intent or ignorance) is misleading and irrelevant obfuscation of the worst kind. Though we could muddle our way with the old radios, they were limited and problematic. Firelink, we were promised, was a fully integrated digital system which was to be the answer to all our communications and information needs; it was to be quick, versatile, robust and easy to use... so far this has proved not to be the case. As operational Firefighters we actively embraced this new system, but since its inception it has not delivered on any of those original promises. We await implementation of upgrades and assurances that the system will be fully fit for purpose before too long, but in the meantime it’s back to making best of compromised comms systems as we have always done, and in the meantime, rest assured to the public, we’re past masters at this. The fault here clearly lies with the providers of the system, and perhaps a proportion of blame can be levied at those involved in the original consultation and procurement processes with these providers. The worst anyone else involved can be accused of (including operational Firefighters) is being unknowingly sold a pup… but hey, pups can grow into good working animals, so perhaps all is not yet lost!
Kenny Mactavish
Report this comment

It's not really a radio problem, it's the computer system behind the Firelink system. I feel that there should always be an analogue (or at least, simplex untrunked) back-up channel available in case of failure of the digital systems. Nobody is saying it, but I suspect the main reason why there is such a push for an exclusive tightly integrated all-digital system is to free up the old frequencies so that they can be auctioned. That can come, but it's almost certainly too soon to be relying 100% on the new technology, even if there is a back-up. They need to wait until the dust settles.
Runcible the Fatuous
Report this comment

Where have anyone seen a computer system running at 100% efficiency??, Anything can upset the connections. We have seen all too often what can happen when computers fail. Train & air crashes, ambulance services disrupted. Many many more. Yes they are useful, but why rely on them totally. 100% use of computers is asking for trouble and anywone with any sense knows that. I am sure that any reputable IT consultant will tell you that.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Everyone said it would happen one day, is there any indication whether the other emergency services affected and whether the rest of the UK was affected? They were lucky this time that the mobile radio networks continued to work, they might not at the time of a major emergency or during power cuts. I have been waiting for a major prolonged power failure during the winter, I doubt whether Airwave could cope whereas the previous VHF systems would run for weeks off their diesel generators.
M B
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.