city looks set to pull out of hotel development

Auditors to investigate finances of the AECC

By Calum Ross

Published: 18/08/2010

A team of auditors is to be sent in to investigate the financial operations of the north-east’s main conference venue amid fresh concerns about the way it is run.

The review, expected to be rubber-stamped later today, comes after it emerged the troubled Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre (AECC) spent a significant sum on a luxury hotel project before the local authority agreed the scheme.

Aberdeen City Council is now expected to pull out of the four-star hotel development, because of “unacceptably high risks” detailed in a confidential report.

Bosses at the AECC will be asked to write off £2.3million they had already spent on the project, with a large amount of the money believed to have been spent before councillors backed the development.

The council – which owns the centre and the land earmarked for the hotel – faces having to provide a £568,000 grant to help cover the cost.

Councillors will be asked to approve the grant at today’s full council meeting, and to order its auditors to carry out a wide review of the AECC’s finances and management.

Councillor Alan Donnelly, leader of the opposition Aberdeen Conservatives group, said he supported the venue, but described the audit as an “unusual” move.

He said: “They obviously believe there is something not right financially. You don’t send auditors in with no reason.”

Accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers will carry out the audit. Similar reviews are periodically carried out at bodies which the council is involved in running, but they are rarely instructed by the authority.

Councillor Neil Fletcher, chairman of AECC’s board, would not comment on the confidential report.

But he did say: “As a director of the organisation, I have no concerns about its finances at all. In fact, I am very pleased because for the first time the AECC has lived within its means and not run up an operational debt.”

Council officials previously described the hotel development at the Bridge of Don site as “fundamental” to securing the future of the AECC, which was estimated to inject £77.3million into the local economy last year.

Councillors agreed to guarantee the scheme in February, as well as push back loan repayment deadlines as part of a package of measures to save it from receivership.

Last month The Press and Journal revealed that negotiations over the hotel project were close to collapse. The proposed deal would have seen the centre achieve an estimated return of between £14million and £20million within five years, but the council could have been left to foot the entire £24million cost of building the hotel if the AECC ran into further financial difficulties.

Aberdeen City Council is unlikely to abandon the hotel project because it has little choice but to continue supporting the venue. Its collapse would leave the authority in a perilous financial position, due to £28million owed by the AECC in loans.

The council is expected to look to change the terms of the deal in order to limit its financial risks – a move that would also generate less profit for the venue.

An AECC spokeswoman said: “For several years now, the board of Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre has been working, on behalf of Aberdeen City Council, to develop its land to provide a four-star hotel, and also to generate a significant cash profit in order to repay its historic debt to the council.

“Market conditions mean that the council feels that although the profit expected is considerable, the related risk may be too high, and it may therefore wish to develop the hotel in a different way.

“Although this means that the eventual profit for the land will be lower, a hotel will still be built.

“Until this profit is realised, Aberdeen City Council will not be in a position to pay for the investment already made by AECC.

“The AECC is having a positive trading year and has been living within its budgets. The centre is not currently increasing its debt and continues to contribute positively to the local economy.”

Reader's Comments

Oh what a sorry mess. The big lesson here is for the council to stay well clear of any big-ticket projects that can land them in trouble. On no account should they borrow any money to pay for the City Square Project, even if they do have this daft notion that business rates increases will pay for this totally.
mike shepherd
Report this comment

Many people would regard TIF as just another form of junk finance of the type responsible for the near collapse of most of our banks. PWC seems to be advising our council – a willing listener it must be said – that TIF can be regarded as a sound, tangible form of asset enabling the council to spend our money a long time in advance of ever receiving it. To learn more, carry out an internet search for PWC scandals.
Ubi D
Report this comment

A tremendous amount of taxpayer money has been poured into AECC. The only reason the AECC isn't self supporting is its run by council. These facilities should be privatised before they bankrupt the council. Council should not be spending taxpayers money to develop hotels. This is absolutely ridiculous. Can you imagine trying to run a hotel with staff that take 19 sick days/year, retire with finally salary pensions at 60, demand automatic raises every year and can't be dismissed no matter how incompetent. AECC have shown they can't properly run a convention center so they should not be given more investment and responsibility. It's just plain stupid. Only incompetents would embark on such a strategy.
Alan Craigie
Report this comment

Yup: the more so because our Council doesn't seem to have the required knack of picking winners; rather the reverse. I don't see why ACC needed to get into the hotel development business in the first place - the city is awash with new and proposed hotels, to the extent of over-provision.
Alex Mitchell
Report this comment

Sounds like some criminal investigations should be called for - any one called in the police as yet - or can't that be done for anything to do with the council !!!! Can't see how AECC can inject 77.3 million into the ecomony ?? Sounds very dodgy - get the police involved .
D. Little
Report this comment

The article seems to indicate that ACC didn't know what AECC was doing with the money they'd provided. I this is so someone needs to be made accountable. Surely even ACC doesn't "lend" 28 million without knowing what it's to be used for. Neil Fletcher needs to stop hiding behind the can't comment shield and be forthright.
Alan Craigie
Report this comment

There is no financial rigour, which may be an indication of why Sue Bruce is keen to leave the city so soon after her appointment ostensibly to put this city on to some kind of secure financial footing. This on-going saga of AECC continues despite the assurances that it is going to pay its way, and with councillors on the board, who are there presumably to protect the interests of the city and its citizens, and to ensure fiscal responsibility of the management. We still have two more years of the ruling group in this council, and it is worrying just how deep they will put this city into debt that is spiralling out of their control. The problem is that they may well sell off the assets of this city without any thought of this city's future and heritage. The councillors and the senior officials ought to be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
dorothy bothwell
Report this comment

Equally, if wir Cooncil are reluctant to stand as guarantor for a loan of £24 million to finance AEEC's reasonably sure-thing hotel investment, it's difficult to understand why they're dead-set on pushing ahead with the ACSEF/Ian Wood City Square Project, which even conservative estimates cost at upwards of £300 million, requiring - even allowing for Sir Ian's £50 million - wir Cooncil to stand as guarantor for loans amounting to at least ten times the £24 million required by AEEC's hotel!
Alex Mitchell
Report this comment

How many times did ACC bailed out AECC before someone decided to call in auditors? AECC should be spun off as a completely independent business that has nothing whatsoever to do with ACC. How can AECC possibly not be in profit? For the Oil Capital of Europe, as we are called (who's idea was that?), the city is in dire straits indeed.
PC Middleton
Report this comment

I am in communication with Councillors Neil Fletcher, Kirsty West and Bill Cormie in relation to free tickets for music concerts (Including X Factor tickets given to Mr Cormie) being handed on to friends, family and fellow councillors. Councillor Cormie has, so far, failed to reply to my emails and has been informed that it is my intention to report an apparent anomoly in his register of interests, when compared to Kirsy West's register of interests to the relevant authority. I am prepared to make available to auditors my emails and the replies from Councillors Fletcher and West. I am further prepared to hand on the communications to the police, should this be requested, if any investigation of possible breaches of registering of councillors' interests laws proves necessary.
Graham Slater
Report this comment

I have information which suggests that acsef may be asked by ACC to 'HELP' in the running of AECC.
Graham Slater
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.