OPPOSITION GROWS AFTER MINISTER REVEALS TARGET OF 45p A UNIT

SNP fights for survival of alcohol price policy

By Cameron Brooks

Published: 03/09/2010

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon was battling to save her flagship policy last night after revealing the government wants alcohol sold at a minimum price of 45p per unit.

The proposal came under fresh fire from the drinks industry and opposition politicians – despite her claims that it would save lives and money.

The plan would push up the cost of buying super-strength lager and cider, as well as supermarkets’ own-brand spirits.

It would have no impact, however, on the price of drinks associated with antisocial behaviour and violence among young people, including Buckfast tonic wine and alcopops.

The Conservatives have already warned SNP ministers they face defeat at Holyrood for a second time because opposition MSPs agree that the best way to tackle Scotland’s unhealthy relationship with the bottle is through the duty system at UK level.

The Scotch Whisky Association maintained last night that the plans were illegal and would damage the industry at home and abroad, potentially costing jobs.

Under the government’s proposals – which are backed by the medical profession, the police and some sections of the alcohol industry – the price of a three-litre bottle of Tesco’s own-brand cider would increase from £2.90 to £7.43.

A bottle of Asda Smart Price vodka would cost £11.81 instead of £7.97 and four cans of Tennent’s Super lager would cost £8.10 instead of £6.

Ms Sturgeon said SNP ministers were confident the pricing plan could reduce consumption and deliver health and social benefits, while complying with EU law.

She claimed the measure would lead to 50 fewer deaths, 1,200 fewer hospital admissions, a £5.5million reduction in health-care costs and 22,900 fewer days’ absence from work in the first year.

It would save the country £51million in police, health and justice system costs in the same period.

Over 10 years, Ms Sturgeon said, the policy would result in 225 fewer deaths a year, 4,200 fewer hospital admissions and an £83million reduction in health-care costs.

She added that overall savings to public services over the decade would amount to £721million.

Ms Sturgeon said cheap alcohol meant greater consumption and an increase in drink-related deaths, disease, crime and disorder.

“I believe it’s crucial that we reintroduce realistic alcohol pricing,” she said.

The Alcohol Commission set up by the Labour Party has recommended a ban on selling beer, wine and spirits at below the “floor price” of the cost of production, plus the cost of duty and VAT.

Ms Sturgeon, who is in favour of testing minimum pricing to see if it works, said using the tax system as it stood would not result in any alcoholic products rising in price.

She added that duty on cider would have to be increased by more than 200% to have the same impact as minimum pricing.

Ms Sturgeon said it was the Scottish Parliament’s responsibility to take action and not “pass the buck” to Westminster.

Scotland’s Chief Medical Officer Dr Harry Burns said it was essential that the policy was introduced as quickly as possible to save lives.

“We are, sadly, world-class when it comes to damaging our health through heavy drinking,” he said.

“But that can change. Scotland led the way in the UK when it came to banning smoking in public places and I believe we must also lead the way in introducing a minimum price for alcohol.

“The longer we delay means that people will be dying who would otherwise rein back their drinking and give themselves the opportunity to recover.

“Increasing the price in this way is the quickest and most effective way to change the harm that is being done to our health.”

British Medical Association Scotland chairman Dr Brian Keighley said: “The eyes of the world are on the Scottish Parliament so I urge MSPs not to let us down and to support minimum pricing because it is the right thing to do.”

Dr Evelyn Gillan, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, said: “It is time for politicians to stop bickering and legislate in the public health interest.”

Scottish Labour’s Jackie Baillie claimed the SNP had got the policy badly wrong because it would put “over £140million into the pockets of the big supermarkets” without creating a single extra penny for more police or the NHS.

“A minimum price of 45p per unit will make no difference to the cost of problem drinks like Buckfast, but it will punish pensioners and people on low incomes,” she added.

“It is effectively a tax on the poor, paid directly to the shareholders of the big supermarkets.”

Highlands and Islands Conservative MSP Mary Scanlon said the policy would merely boost cross-border and internet sales.

“The supermarkets will be jumping up and down with glee at the tens of millions of pounds of extra profits they would stand to make as ordinary people are forced to pay more for a bottle of wine or Scotch,” she said.

“Unfortunately for them, it’s not going to happen.”

Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Robert Brown said: “The SNP have taken a very narrow view of the whole process, totally ignoring much more effective solutions which would cover the entire UK, something which the coalition government is already considering.”

Reader's Comments

What a misleading headline and very unfair. Opposition is not growing it remains the same there is also a high level of support from health professionals and the police. Why did the P and J feel the need to go with that kind of misleading headline. Min pricing of some sort is now supported by all the political parties,it won't cure the problem but we have to start somewhere.
Danny Reid
Report this comment

Oh Dear! What a weak headline - "SNP fights for survival of alcohol price policy" Health experts and Police authorities believe this is the way forward - but you don't? The Labour Party and it's cohorts - all members of a Scottish Parliament - want to defer this to the UK Government. Give me strength! Scottish Cringe or what!
Brian McCulloch
Report this comment

Danny, The P&J have to sensationise everything these days to try to sell their rag......I dont know where Sturgeon gets her projected figures from.... A big increase in alcohol costs will only line the pockets of the large supermarkets who in turn could I suppose raise their costs on one bottle but give another one free. The crime rate I would prefer to have a guess would not drop, because those desperate enough for the booze would either steel it or mug someone for the cash, which then would keep the hospital intake similar also. Just pretty much the same that is happening now with drugs.... So in the end once again those that like the "odd tipple" will suffer because of the minority by this ill thought out plan.
Lord Lucan
Report this comment

Your Lordship, You say - "A big increase in alcohol costs will only line the pockets of the large supermarkets..." Ms sturgeon has not suggested a big increase in alcohol costs, she is proposing a minimum price for a unit of alcohol. Very different and targetted approach. Standard whisky (Bell's etc) will have no price change. In todays news elsewhere, it is stated that the sales of alcoholic drinks will/must be affected by this approach. So, 'lining the pockets of the large supermarkets' might just be a tad innacurate. I take it you are in favour of passing this problem over to that great supporter of Scotland David Cameron (Just as Ms Baillie is suggesting).
Brian McCulloch
Report this comment

Do this do that, i dont need any one to tell me how much to drink or smoke, if you are serious ban it.
bob seivwright
Report this comment

The're all full of kaack. Lord Lucan, no the crime rate won't go down, I'd hasten a guess it would actually go up, as the desperate rob and steal even more to fund the price difference. The villoent crime assostiated with drink will stay unchanged as a result as these are the result of trendy night club goers who on point of fashion drink the most expensive stuff anyway! This is just a creamer for the governments. They should be tackiling the real social factors behind why the "satans home" people want to drink so much in the first place. But they won't coz then they won't get the tax from the price increase! They'll make it even worse, multiplying the consumption.
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

##lORD LUCAN## perhaps, with your superior knowledge,you could come forward with a solution to this problem, and,believe, the police, the medical authorities plus various other bodies,consider this a great problem.Remember we had 8 years of libcon/lab administration who did nothing and are now using this as a political football. To finalise, the p&J is no longer a newspaper, it is just another hootsmon etc plugged into labour party headquarters, if you want an on line unbiased read, go to NEWSNET SCOTLAND.
JAMES MURRAY
Report this comment

##lORD LUCAN## perhaps, with your superior knowledge,you could come forward with a solution to this problem, and,believe, the police, the medical authorities plus various other bodies,consider this a great problem.Remember we had 8 years of libcon/lab administration who did nothing and are now using this as a political football. To finalise, the p&J is no longer a newspaper, it is just another hootsmon etc plugged into labour party headquarters, if you want an on line unbiased read, go to NEWSNET SCOTLAND.
JAMES MURRAY
Report this comment

Hi James, Newsnet Scotland, that's the independence site? As a result they just default to trumpetting SNP policy, which I understand, I used to sympathise. Independence is still very close to my heart but I drew a line. I don't relish the thought of being led to it by someone who has been bought and sold....you never know where you'll land.
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

Under the government’s proposals – the price of a three-litre bottle of Tesco’s own-brand cider would increase from £2.90 to £7.43......... mmm!!!.. seems like a price increase to me.... James,,,I don't for one minute doubt that alcohol is a problem for Scotland and the tax payers...but this proposal will solve nothing, as I said it will end up like the drugs problem with those desperate for the drink, but with no money to pay for it will either steal or mug for it..If there is going to be a hike in drinks prices then it may as well be a tax, at least this could be one way of putting something back in to the society at hospital and policing levels. Unless oc course we can get Tescos/ASDA etc.. to make a donation to our health service/
Lord Lucan
Report this comment

Yes remember when the government told us that eating beef was safe. Then they had to change their minds after people were infected with the mad cow disease. Governments and scientsts are not always correct. How many people have been convicted of a crime by "Scientific" means, which turned out to be false. All very well for them to say minimum pricing will work. It will not affect most, but it will make no difference to the binge drinkers, they will get the money whatever way they can. More likely by stealing or mugging. Considering that the polce forces are going to be cut, this would lead to a higher rate of criminal offences. Swings and roundabouts.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Am awa tae get blootert!
manniewe naeclue
Report this comment

Of course a significant price increase will deter a few. But when that price increase is going to simply enhance the supermarkets profits it's wrong. Better that taxation is used so that the additional inmcome can be used to fund treatment, the police etc.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

We could always leave Scotland problem with the drink for someone else to deal with.
Tam Glen
Report this comment

Ron, where does all the tax on the motorist go, not on better roads, thats for sure.
Tam Glen
Report this comment

Tam, This proposal is being put forward by your pals in the Scottish government so it would be up to them surely to ensure the tax remained for the benefit of Scotland.. As the proposal stands at present,I am sure Tescos/ASDA would only be too happy to send a complimentry tray of pies to the bloated haggis on a weekly basis as a small price to pay for their extra bonus.,... :-)
Lord Lucan
Report this comment

Ye'll need tae raise me gyro if ye raise the price o cider tae £7. That's me breakfast.
JOCK MACTAVISH
Report this comment

It will make no difference to consumption, the only people who will stop buying will be the moderate drinker,what is a binge drinker anyway, young people drinking too much on a Friday and saturday, if my memory serves me well after all my nights out it was the same 50 years ago.Get a life, get the police to arrest drunken yobs, get the courts to dish out proper sentences in prison.We are looking for solutions for everything we are told is bad for us through figures and surveys think tanks etc. Bring your kids up properly and you will get better results.
bob seivwright
Report this comment

If this happens I will buy shares in the supermarkets as their profits will go through the roof! This is just a hair brained idea that will not sort the real problem - the lack of police to stop the bad behaviour!
Doug Donaldson
Report this comment

So supermarkets will make a killing over this. Salmond must be sponsored by them as he seems to do NOTHING other than open new ones. Anything other than live up to his pre election promises. Just another stupid Sturgeon proposal that is never going to see the light of day anyway....same as their promises !
John Innes
Report this comment

So supermarkets will make a killing over this. Salmond must be sponsored by them as he seems to do NOTHING other than open new ones. Anything other than live up to his pre election promises. Just another stupid Sturgeon proposal that is never going to see the light of day anyway....same as their promises !
John Innes
Report this comment

Thats the problem being a minority government,the SNP don't have a mandate to put all their policies through. Thats why Edinburgh is wasting millions of pounds on a tram system backed by the the unionist parties, thats why we don't have a local income tax as the lib dems decided it wasn't their policy after all. As for the alcohol problems ,who knows ,its been with us for decades and maybe Bob has the rights of it, lock them up ,but then that would cost even more money.
Danny Reid
Report this comment

manniewe naeclue "I don't relish the thought of being led to it by someone who has been bought and sold" You mean like Blair, Brown, Maggie, Heath, Major.... I could go on!
alan reid
Report this comment

Unionist way of running Scotland: Keep them drunk stoned, stupid by reading the DailyRecord, The Sun, P&J, Hootsman, and Herald. And after years of telling lies to the Scots that they are to stupid, thick and small to run their own country, then they'll run back to to London screaming to run our country for us! Disgusting and pathetic1
alan reid
Report this comment

manniewe naeclue "Am awa tae get blootert!" Spoken like a true Unionist droid!
alan reid
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.