‘Risky’ diabetes drug still in use

By Joe Sinclair

Published: 06/09/2010

A popular diabetes drug is still being prescribed two months after a safety body recommended its withdrawal amid concerns the drug can increase the risk of heart attacks, it was revealed today.

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) called for the immediate withdrawal of rosiglitazone, marketed as Avandia, saying the top-selling drug should never have been licensed.

An investigation found the Commission on Human Medicines advised an expert committee of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in July to withdraw the drug as the “risks of rosiglitazone outweigh its benefits”. They said it “no longer has a place on the UK market”.

Rosiglitazone, which is manufactured by Glaxo SmithKline (GSK), was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2000 to help lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

GSK said their “extensive research” showed the drug was “safe and effective when it is prescribed appropriately”.

But since its approval several studies have suggested the drug may lead to a small overall increase in the risk of heart attacks and the BMJ’s investigations editor, Dr Deborah Cohen, said the European approval process was not rigorous enough.

She also raised concerns about the quality of the data used by GSK, the lack of publicly available trial results for independent scientific scrutiny, and failures to act swiftly on emerging safety fears about the drug.

The journal said doctors were advising that no new patients should start taking the drug and patients already using rosiglitazone should review their options. Those at higher risk of heart disease should be advised to stop taking it.

Professor John Yudkin of University College London said: “Ten years after the release of rosiglitazone, we still cannot accurately quantify the harm to which we were exposing our patients.

“We need to be absolutely certain that our long-term treatments for type 2 diabetes are not causing the very harm they are meant to prevent.

“And if the regulatory bodies do not insist on clear evidence of greater benefit than harm, they are failing in their basic purpose.”

Clinical pharmacologist Dr Yoon Loke, of the University of East Anglia, told the Panorama programme, which also investigated the issue, that the drug could have caused an extra one thousand heart attacks and about six hundred extra cases of heart failure in the UK last year.

The MHRA told the programme it has sent a letter to doctors advising them to “consider alternative treatments where appropriate”.

GSK told the programme: “We have carried out an extensive research programme, involving more than 50,000 patients to analyse the safety and benefits of Avandia and continue to believe it is safe and effective when it is prescribed appropriately.”

BBC One’s Panorama: A Risk Worth Taking? will be broadcast tonight at 8.30pm.

Reader's Comments

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.