Everyone will suffer, councillor warnsNo area of public sector safe

Aberdeen parks and music tuition spared in £71m cuts

By Calum Ross

Published: 03/12/2010

Councillors in Aberdeen have given their backing to £71million of cuts – but shelved plans to scrap the city’s celebrated music-tuition service, close every park in the city and hit drivers with a congestion charge.

The city council’s ruling Liberal Democrat-SNP coalition admitted yesterday that every resident of Aberdeen was going to suffer because of its five-year programme of savings.

Finance convener Kevin Stewart said no area of the public sector was safe from cuts – and that the local authority in Aberdeen needed to save £120million or risk going “bankrupt”.

Councillors agreed at yesterday’s finance committee to recommend 178 savings options, worth a total of £71million, to a key meeting of all elected members on December 15.

Cuts supported by the administration included halving the number of pupil-support assistants in city schools, leading to 290 job losses.

They also backed a proposal to withhold £9million that was assumed to be needed to meet the growing number of pupils with extra needs, raising fears that special-needs bases could close and 27 specialist teachers be made redundant.

Plans to hit hotels with a “bed tax” were also supported, as was increasing parking charges every two years and the privatisation, or “mutualisation”, of entire council departments, including its finance and legal functions.

The committee called for more information and further reports before making any recommendations on 31 other potential cuts, worth £43.5million.

These included plans to close two care homes for the elderly, privatise children’s homes and reduce funding for Grampian Police by more than £3.5million.

The future of the city’s music-tuition service – used by 3,000 school pupils every week – will also be the subject of another report, although senior councillors said it would continue, potentially with increased charges for all but the poorest families.

Another 43 proposed cuts, worth £33.2million, were shelved by finance committee members, including controversial plans to end free personal care, increase primary school class sizes and close the city’s music school and all Aberdeen’s public parks and toilets.

Mr Stewart said: “No one enters elected office to make cuts but unfortunately the depth of savings we are required to make in these extremely difficult economic times gives us no choice but to do so.

“We have got some extremely difficult decisions to make over the next few weeks and months. What I don’t want is for this council to reach the point of bankruptcy.

“Everybody is going to suffer because of these budget cuts. No one in our society will remain untouched.

“We must get through this and ensure that the most vulnerable are protected and that the city’s economy is protected.”

It emerged yesterday that a large proportion of the £120million savings measures in the five-year plan were earmarked for next year, although exact figures have not been revealed.

The council has already announced it will shed 900 jobs next year, but a decision on whether the redundancies would be compulsory or voluntary was deferred at yesterday’s meeting, and will now be considered by the full council on December 15.

Other savings supported by the administration yesterday include a reduction in its funding of the Fairer Scotland Fund, which tackles deprivation, maximising class sizes for older teenagers in secondary schools and raising cremation and burial fees by 10%.

Grant Bruce, Aberdeen secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union, said the administration’s plan would not protect the most vulnerable in society.

“By getting rid of 27 primary and secondary ASN (additional support needs) teachers, many local ASN bases will close,” he said.

Opposition councillors tried yesterday to have the entire business-plan report moved to the full council meeting in two weeks, but were defeated by 10 votes to five.

Labour’s Gordon Graham said: “We are here talking about a five-year plan but the Scottish Government has only given us a one-year budget.”

His colleague, Neil Cooney, said: “This is an attack on the quality of life of every citizen in the city today.”

Labour members were criticised, however, for failing to produce alternative proposals for savings.

Liberal Democrat Kate Dean said: “I do think it’s an abdication of their responsibilities and it’s one we are getting used to.”

Conservative councillor Jim Farquharson said he would be revealing alternative budget proposals at the full council meeting.

Reader's Comments

What is shocking about all of this, is that the Council are not telling you that they will be adding expenditure to the budget. Teachers losing their jobs, care homes shutting down, police budget cut, yet they are still planning to borrow millions to fund spending on new roads. The interest payments to the sum of millions per year will come from the budget they are supposed to be cutting. The ACSEF agenda comes well above the interests of the people as far as this administration is concerned.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Unpalateable but necessary. Now's the time for all in Aberdeen to step up to the plate and work through this instead of whingeing and moaning. ACSEF is a necessary and much needed organisation in all this if you look at what Clyde Waterfront has done for Glasgow and the surrounding area the evidence is there. The charitable sector has to be more proactive in particular VSA and Cornerstone. Maybe someone can take VSA to task as to why Woodgrove (built 1997) is currently closed and boarded up? Can't be not fit for purpose can it?
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Maybe Sandy, could then detail the 'good' Acsef have done for the citizen of the city, since its fruition? Lets start with education and public parks...
roger fontain
Report this comment

Millions on new roads to Aberdoom, a city with no parks, no public toilets, what schools that are left, overcrowded. If that's whinging, you are going to hear a lot more Mr Sandy Milne. ACSEF must go, cut its funding now.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

According to reports in the press, one of the first things the ConDem coalition did when they took office was to announce that, in line with the need for cost saving across the country, they had agreed a five percent cut in ministerial salaries. Perhaps then, as a first step to getting the public onside, AAC’s elected representatives - especially those of the LibDem and Tory persuasion - should announce a reduction in their salaries and expenses.
Hall Harper
Report this comment

If you read the bumph from ACSEF, they make a big thing about attracting young professionals to Aberdeen. It was the BIG justification for the City square after all; the giant concrete slab would knock their socks off and they would proclaim to the skies that they just had to come and live in Aberdeen. But honestly, who would want to come with their family to a city with no public parks, no public toilets, the city centre is a midden because street cleaning has been cut right back.
mike shepherd
Report this comment

so this is how you protect the most vulnerable " close two care homes for the elderly - withhold £9million that was assumed to be needed to meet the growing number of pupils with extra needs - reduction in its funding of the Fairer Scotland Fund, which tackles deprivation yet they agree to save the city’s celebrated music-tuition service and goodeness knows what else - IT WILL ONLY BE THE DI9SABLES ELDERLY AND VULNERABLE THAT WILL SUFFER AS USUAL - stop funding the drunks, junkies and criminals and use it to protect the MOST VULNERABLE IN THE COMMUNITY
Tom Owenson
Report this comment

The city cannot afford the ACSEF agenda. I pay council tax for services, I want parks, I want decent schools, I want a police force to protect me. I don't want my council tax to be spent on new roads and Ian wood's concrete square.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

You lot don't understand what this is all about do you. ACSEF is an Economic Forum and has got absolutely nothing to do with Parks, Schools, Toilets or any other public service you care to mention. It is about creating the right conditions for economic growth that is the engine that drives prosperity and ultimately better services for all. If there is no economic growth things will be a lot worse than what they are and you lot want to kill it? Get a grip and stop whingeing and moaning and get on with it.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

ACSEF, the city cant afford you.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

@ Tom you forgot air head artists in your rant. £1.2M to PVA over the last 10 years for running costs. Agreed support and protect the disabled and elderly first and foremost that is the priority. Why then does VSA close homes and nobody says anything by all reports they have more money than ACC.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Sandy - then ACC needs to tackle VSA if thats the case - I am only remarking on the article and the taxpayers money squandered by the council - I dont suffer from greed so let me see the list of things that are funded/needing funds and I will soon show you what to cut out and protect the most vulnerable in our community at the same time
Tom Owenson
Report this comment

ACSEF is a runaway organisation funded by our council that has turned into a lobby for big business. Ian Wood wants his city square, yeh we'll support that even if nobody else likes it. Big business wants new roads, yeh we'll get the local councils to borrow the money and the small people can pay the interest out of their council tax. Their schools are shutting, the parks are under threat, the poor and vulnerable are going by the way side, but we get what we want.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

ACSEF is as useful to Aberdeen as an ashtray is to a motorcycle. Half a million pounds of taxpayers' money could be spent more creatively.
Alasdair Johnston
Report this comment

I certainly wouldn't want to be a councillor at this time. Yes, mistakes were made by this administration and indeed by previous administrations. I note, that while opposition parties are bewailing potential swingeing cuts, they put no concrete proposals of their own forward. We must always remember that the deepest cuts to be made in the city's history are because of the decisions made at Westminster. Whether they are actually necessary over the short term, instead of being spread over a generation, is debateable. The sooner the odious party in power at Westminster are voted out, the better. Many of their actions are being enacted for reasons of purely political dogma and that is wrong.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

It will be interesting to see Cllr Farquarsons proposals to see how out of touch he really is. Remember folks he called another Cllr a Faggot is it any wonder the conservatives are so unelectable when they behave like that ?
Anne Onimas
Report this comment

The council must stop any further borrowing that adds millions to the expenditure budget. This is a message that has to be repeated again and again until they listen.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

As usual Sandy is sticking up for the money spent on ACSEF, their Energetica route and all that. That was what it started out as a Forum, now it has got a wee bit too big for its boots, through the help it gets from the council CEO and councilors. They have overeached themselves with their underhanded way of proposing the Wood project. They would have been much better keeping to their original plans, eg. Energetic. A grandiose plan for regeneration and massive employment, though why nobody knows, as soon Scotland will be one massive golf course, that is all we need, That and tourism. No wonder there are so many hotels being build in Aberdeen. No doubt Sandy will come up with some more knock backs on folk who complain that the cuts are dreadful. He is after all a solid supporter of ACSEF. (wonder what is in it for him). As for Kevin Stewarts comments "Everybody is going to suffer" that is except the council. Kate Dean as usual critising Labour for abdicating their responsibilites by not giving alternate proposals. Is she forgetting that is why Lib dem is in at the moment, to rectify not blame. So now she wants others to make the decisions, because she obviously cannot come up with some good proposals. Perhaps the council can do what Kevin Stewart says and suffers a bit, like cutting out the expensive £671,507 civic hospitalities, and surely the £55,688 iis totaly wasted on the Provosts car, that is not a necessary especially for a man who cannot fulfil his duties most of the time. After all he has proven himself to be a useless Provost time and again. This lot were voted in to supposedly make a better job of running the council, now they are bleating that other parties are not coming up with better proposals. Well stand down Kate, Kevin and John and let the others get on with it. ALso just why are some of the councilors moaning about not getting free Christmas cards. Thought Kevin Stewart said "we are all going to suffer". Well easy enough, buy your own, same as everyone else.
minnie mo
Report this comment

As bad as all this is and who or what is to blame is all in the past. Aberdeen and the North East is at the forefront of remodelling public finances. Time will tell if they get it right or not. Just take a look around the rest of the UK and you'll see all other Councils having to implement the same cuts and business models that Aberdeen embarked upon some time ago.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Minnie the Provosts car is paid for out of the common good fund and has nothing to do with operating revenue accounts.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

But yet again Mr Milne, Minnie has a point. The fast shrinking Common Good fund has just over £5million in it at a time when Council cuts are going to badly affect the poor and vulnerable in Aberdeen (but not the city's millionaires). So it is symptomatic of our economically incompetent administration that they spent £671,507 on civic receptions and £55,688 on the provost's car out of the Common Good fund last year. Yes everybody is going to suffer, or perhaps not.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Hi Dormer, the £5 million will be the cash balance held by the Fund. I would think the total value of the Common Good Fund would be over £60 million.
Michty Me
Report this comment

Congratulations to the music tuition campaigners you did a great job. However, as usual gutless councillors give in to the pressure of those who protest and do so at the expense of others. While people are popping off to their music lesson, children in the same school will be denied a basic education because the budget for additional support needs and pupil support assistants has been cut.
John Cuthbert
Report this comment

Sandie-"Acsef to promote local economy in schools, colleges and universities". Melfort Campbell says "We need to educate them about the fantastic opportunies in energy" and to "embrace enterprise in a more meaningful way".Furtermore, Acsef's first step will be to influence the Curriculum for Excellence agenda in schools.A taskforce of representatives from education and industry will be set uop to help shape the curriculum in the City and Shire schools to ensure that pupils are equipped with the relevant knowledge and skills that the local economy needs'. Also,"geology and physics to become a core part of the curriculum to MEET THE DEMAND IN THE ENERGY SECTOR".This is for both PRIMARY and secondary schools to "change the perspective of young peopletoward the oil and gas inusrty specifically' and "at the appropriate earlier of their education".Nothing to do with schools Sandie? Indoctrinatng young kids. Briainwashing them early. Revolting.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

Harvey nothing financially or operationally to do with schools big difference there. The Common Good fund as of 2007 was total value £45m declared in reality much more, are we saying we throw that away by realising the full value for short term gain. I don't think so.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Sandie- You do not find an unelected quango trying to influence primary schoolkids in order to benefit their own agenda "and our businesses" alarming?
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

A civilized society is judged upon its culture and its care of the more vulnerable members of that society. Acsef, the organ grinders to the Sorry National party/ Non Liberal Undemocratic admin.monkeys have rendered Aberdeen City very much uncivilized.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

The Council could start by cutting funding to ACSEF. Why should council tax payers fund an organisation that wants to build over parks? They must be rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of all the city's parks closing.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Precisely- The council should but won't .Not as long as Ascef have their team there doing their bidding in the form of Gordon McIntosh, Gerry Brough, and Stewart Carruth who may or may not have their eyes on the main chance. As for the more intellectually challenged local councillors, it's easy to deceive a child.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

Acsef also overlook the fact that vocational education is an oxymoron. A bit like military intelligence.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

Is the rumour true that the council staff who should have been monitoring the rock salt supplies were diverted to progress Tommy Smith's acsef luncheons expenses?
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

Have you lot missed the point of this article? The parks are safe as is music tuition!!! Where was Annie Lennox when the threat to music tuition was muted? Simon Cowell to build a Karaoke Studio in the Duthie Park
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

ACC EDUCATION OFFICE STAFF RECEIVE REDUNDANCY NOTICES - Offer made by ACC for self-employment terms as hired school contractors. Education officials said to be 'gobsmacked', by Councillor Bill Cormie, at the thought of having to sell themselves.
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

mooted!
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

ABERDEEN INCANDESCENT AT ACSEF SURVIVAL - Tommy Smith said to be in discussions with going to ground at Aberdeenshire Council. SMITH TO STAND FOR ELECTION AS LORD PROVOST OF ABERDEENSHIRE.
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

Shergar- Yes it is true and absolutley necessary to secure the future economic prosperity of the City and Shire, and Connectivity Smith plays a vital role in assuring that this can be delivered for future generations of brainwashed kids.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

The parks and music tuition in the city are as safe as ACSEF's reputation in the Labour party. Read the article again Mr Milne: " Councillors in Aberdeen have given their backing to £71million of cuts – but shelved plans to scrap the city’s celebrated music-tuition service, close every park in the city." Those council shelves are pretty rickety from all accounts and might just collapse next year.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Harvey, the reprieve granted to the Music Centre, which will need ongoing vigilance and alertness to the very real possibility of the education officials having a second go at it, shows what organised Aberdeen citizens can achieve. Tommy Smith seems to be taking acsef out of the Aberdeen firing line and seeking shelter in the Aberdeenshire bunker, as you pointed out yesterday. He is right to sense that a raft of independent first time councillors in 2012 will immediately end his ACC funding. COUNCILLORS J& K Stewart - YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET!
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

Coming soon, Westburn Park executive houses, Victoria Park mansions, Johnston Gardens affordable homes. Who needs parks now when the cemeteries will be wild life havens?
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Dormer, surely 'THEY' know that they are busted and won't get away with it?
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

The administration of Acsef's cash-flow is being passed onto the shire "speed up delivery of key projects" as of April next year. Interesting timing. Sandie, no civic assets are safe and music tutors will be made to go self-employed and fees will rise. You don't swallow that "saved" rubbish, do you?
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

ACSEF, following on from their criticism of the Labour party over the city square, should go the whole hog and form a political party. Then they would see how popular their policies are, building over parks, favouring the allocation of Council budget funds to new roads when care homes are shutting. Vote for ACSEF, we represent the road to misery. Nae chance.
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Oh how wicked, teaching kids physics and geology. And if they were daft and took harveys advice they would be lucky themselves a minimum wage jobbie.
Michty Me
Report this comment

Yes, who wants or more to the point needs parks. Frequented by outsiders and weirdos. A beautiful sunken Victorian garden in the middle of the city? An absolute disgrace and an eyesore. This sort of offence to nature is holding back the future economic security of our region and letting our children and grandchildren down. I'm convinced they would rather have a car-park and a giant concrete slab instead.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

Aye, but the Labour Party has got a history on park building. Wanted to build tower blocks in the Victoria Park. Think the then Secretary of State had to put a stop to the proposal.
Michty Me
Report this comment

Rubbish as usual Michty. My criticism is the intention and emphasis on particular subjects that "suit" the "change of perspective of young people toward the oil and gas industry specifically". I also did not offer any advice. Anyway the wonderful Tracy Emin is certainly no longer on a minimum wage. You are blinkered in the extreme if you think Working for the Yankee Dollah is the only solution for our children.
harvey freshwater
Report this comment

Good point Michty, the people of Aberdeen need to stand up and defend their amenities, no quarter given. It doesn't matter what party is in control. It is good to see Aberdonians ready to demonstrate to preserve what is good in the city. That's at least six demos this year at the town house not counting the unions. No more passive acceptance of any old rubbish that the Council comes up with, let them know what you think!
Dormer Window
Report this comment

Emin, yes, certainly an enterprising hure for the uber rich, providing an opportunity for them ostentatiously squander their money. "Hey look at me I'm so rich I can afford flush it doon the lavvie"
Michty Me
Report this comment

Sandy we are aware that all councils are having to make cuts. But do these other council have an unelected "Forum" like ACSEF taking public money and wasting it on underhanded consultations. Perhaps they should have left the "hot potato" of Woods vision alone, as nobody was too interested ind what they were planning with there Energetica Corridor. But now that they have stuck their neck out people are questioning why spend money on them when care homes and schools are maybe being shut. Also surely you do know the differece between "Saved" and "Shelved". One means until next time. Guess which one. Sandy thinks that just because people want to keep the garden, that they are all against progress, that is pure rubbish. His derogatory comments about artists etc, show that he must be a man who does not like culture, Wonder what he thinks about the extension to the ART gallery. When a leading councilor tells us that the cuts will affect us all, we presume that also means the council, and that does seem to be the case. The provosts car, the coffee and rowies etc, to name just a few come out of the Common good fund, what else, probably the hospitalty costs as well. ( and yes I know the rowies got dropped). We also had a councilor moaning that he was not getting his free Christmas cards. Oh how we weep for the hardship of the council. And they are suffering???? The only thing they are suffering is a guilty conscience.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Minnie, I reckon many of the councillors are feeling very stressed at the moment. The cuts they will have to make will be very painful for everybody in the city and it won't be easy to make them. So why are they also insisting on inflicting a double whammy in allowing the plan to concrete over the Gardens to proceed? We are having to face losing many amenities and services, why should we have the appearance of our much-loved city destroyed as well?
mike shepherd
Report this comment

I am not sure but feel that since Mrs Bruce arrived, with her attitude that business is more important than the citiznes, things have got a lot worse. It is with her approval that ACSEF have received so much money, and also her advice to council to vote for Woods proposal. It certainly got her a prestigious award. Perhaps I am being a bit cynical, but it looks that way. Why else would a CEO take the word of ACSEF and Wood with a very underhanded and faulty consultation. After all she was included on the board of ACSEF. To ask the council to go ahead knowing this was faulty makes one wonder why. If the only thing that a CEO and council are concerned with are the business people to the extent of closing care homes and schools, I feel there is something far wrong with this council. I am aware that not all councilors are in agreement with what is happening, but when you have the likes of Bill Comrie ( a gardener supposedly) telling us that the trees in UTG are diseased, then that makes one wonder even more. It is also rather unsettling that we read about the praise of the rejunivating of Duthie Park, in the same breath as closing all parks. Somwhere in all this mess, something smells rather fishy to say the least. Too many things happening geared to accommodate the business people, and not enough for the citizens who pay the council wages. Sorry Mike, you seem to have a bit more sypathy with them than I do. I feel that they care only for themselves, as said earlier, I see no cuts to their lifestyle as a councilor.
minnie mo
Report this comment

Things are hotting-up on the cyber front. Not only are ACC lagging behind Highland Council in NOT webcasting all council meetings, including sub-committees (despite two acsef board members being in a position, through their companies, to offer free webcasting to ACC) but we also learn that Moray Council will post ALL public e-comments on planning applications. The recent excellent and groundbreaking internet organisation, by young people, of the democratic Music Centre protest, at the Toon Hoose, shows the way forward for Aberdonians no longer prepared to accept ACC conniving behind closed doors in what would be smoke-filled rooms; were it not for the smoking regs. The more people hear and see what is going on at ACC, the higher the turnout will be in the 2012 elections. The internet will also make it possible for voters to be guided on vote-ordering and vote-casting under PR. IT ONLY TAKES 800 STRATEGICALLY-ORDERED VOTES TO BE ELECTED TO ACC AS AN INDEPENDENT.
Shergar Nineteensentysevn
Report this comment

Minnie are you totally naive, paranoid or just plain dumb. Of course other cities and regions have organisations similar to ACSEF what do you think Clyde Waterfront is? I'm sure Edinburgh, Dundee and any other high populance region has the same all under the auspices of Scottish Enterprise. It's about time you lot crawled out from under your respective rocks and got into the real world.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Mike you still harping on with the same old tune of concreting over a Victorian Disneyworld Pastiche. Lets face it most of Aberdeen is a Victorian Pastiche dreamt up by Sir Walter Scott and a German Prince.
Sandy Milne
Report this comment

Who is Sandy Milne?
roger fontain
Report this comment

Seems that Sandy you are the naive one, you are the one who believes the Utopian dream of ACSEF. As for crawling out from under rocks. time you went back under yours. Just what is so desperate that UTG gets demolished, apart from S Milne getting his car park, and the rest of the development in Denburn. Just what Wood is expecting bakc is a bit of a mystery. Maybe harks back to his school days of him in the UTG. Maybe the bogey man got him. Sandy you are amazing not only do you believe everything you hear, you want to spread your vitriolic comments about. No wonder the city is in a mess with comments like yours. Yes Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow have something akin to ACSEF but their projects are a million times better. It is only because of one mans vision to cover the park that all this has been allowed to carry on. We have had blatant underhanded PR and votes that were rigged. This should never have been allowed to happen, then we would need a council with some integrity and that is something we do not have. So Sandy please crawl back under the rock with ACSEF marked on it, as you so far have convinced no one of the merits of this delusioned rich man.
minnie mo
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.