Scottish Tory leader unveils plan to let pupils leave school at age 14

By Cameron Brooks

Published: 05/04/2011

Scottish Conservative leader Annabel Goldie has unveiled radical plans to lower the school leaving age to 14 – so disillusioned pupils can learn a trade.

She said not all youngsters are suited to further or higher education, and should have the option of taking up an apprenticeship or vocational training if they want to.

Miss Goldie said the policy would ensure pupils would not be “wasting their time” in the classroom until they were old enough to leave at 16, and a new generation of plumbers, welders and joiners would benefit the country as a whole in the long run.

The pledge, which would require a change in the law, is contained in the party’s Holyrood election manifesto, which was launched in Glasgow yesterday.

Miss Goldie said the fully costed “commonsense” spending plans provided practical help for hard-pressed families, communities and businesses.

She said: “If we continue with the current situation where some children are disengaged with school by the age of 14 and stuck there until they turn 16, I think that is wasting their time.

“We are also denying Scotland an opportunity of what these children might be able to offer if they were directed into some more productive form of learning.”

Miss Goldie stressed youngsters would only be allowed to leave school if they had secured a college place or a recognised training post.

The Tory manifesto also contains proposals to charge graduates of four-year degree courses a maximum of £16,000 to ensure universities are properly funded.

The party – the only one not to offer free higher education – said it was committed to building the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR), which it described as the second most important transport project after the new Forth Road Bridge.

The spending plans also contain a pledge to end a cheap ferry fare scheme to the Western Isles – the Road Equivalent Tariff – to free up £6.6million.

Grants for Hebrides and Northern Isles ferry services would be reduced to save £21.2million over five years.

The party has promised to review the local government funding formula to ensure Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire councils receive a fairer settlement. It also outlined plans to freeze council tax for two years after which individual local authorities would be required to hold a referendum if they want to increase it above the rate of inflation.

Prescription charges, scrapped on April 1, would be reintroduced to raise £37million for the NHS, and the free bus pass age threshold would be raised to 65 to save £110million by 2015.

The party has outlined plans to set up a £200million “pothole fund” to give councils additional money for road maintenance.

What do you think? E-mail pj.editor@ajl.co.uk or write to Letters to the Editor, The Press and Journal, Lang Stracht, Mastrick, Aberdeen, AB15 6DF.

Reader's Comments

This is so unbelievable I checked the date - is it still 1st April? Perhaps the Tories have got confused over daylight savings and turned their clocks back 150 years. Do they want these children to become chimney sweeps perhaps?
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

So how does Miss Goldie plan to pay for the AWPR?
Don Duncan
Report this comment

Actually Richard, Mz Goldie's idea is quite sensible. There are significant numbers of disillusioned pupils who are mentally incapable of progressing to higher education, but would be eminently suited to skills in the trades. Would it not be more sensible to allow them to progress along that course than disrupt the education of those who are capable of progressing further? You have obviously never witnessed the choas a disillusioned teenager can cause in class as they vent thier frustration.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

Ron, the Tory response to the scenario you outline is to send the young Fauntleroy to boarding school. And the idea that a teenager who is disruptive in class will be improved through being allowed to leave full time education is quite daft. It's a weird piece of throw-back class war from an idiot Tory. Goodness knows why Goldie actuall said it, "Call me" Dave in London won't like it one bit - "we're all in this together", remember?
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Richard, not all are capable of expressing themselves on paper but are highly skilled otherwise. Many a good man and indeed woman, has been unable to fulfill their goals because they didny have a wee bit of paper saying they were clever and were denied chances in life. It is this group that Mz Goldie was referring to I would think. Why should they not be given the opportunity to learn a skill at an earlier age so they can go on to prosper?
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

I would say 16 not 14. After all, the academically gifted are in the minority so why let everyone stay on to the age of 18 even though they aspire perhaps to "study" to become a beautician.... If 16 was the cut off point then the money saved could be, for example, used to fund vocational training and the more able pupils would be able to get on with it - the class can only move forward at the pace of the least able pupil after all. I am not a Tory by the way, I just think it is madness to allow pupils who will never ever get highers to stay on anyway.
Fi Donald
Report this comment

Ron, the solution to that is to enable the education system to deliver appropriate skills. The opportunity Ms Goldie is seeing is the cost saving offered by thousands of 14 yr old children rushing out of full time education at the first opportunity; kids who need discipline but don't get it at home; kids who need education but are bored by it; non-Tory kids, largely. Certainly not kids who have made a rational and thought-through decision to move from education to training. It's a shocking and disgraceful idea.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

Let's remember Fi that the requirement for kids to stay on longer in school in recent times was just a cynical ploy to massage the unemployment figures.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

I totally agree with your argument in regard to lack of discipline in the home Richard, and the consequences of that but, should it be the teacher's job to take on the role of parent? I ama firm beliver that parents should be held liable for the actions of their kids and not allowed to evade the responsibility of their "pro creation".
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

Agree Ron. I was just pointing out the kind of folk who'd use any such legislation aren't those necessarily intended to benefit from it, and that's one group in particular. But the Tories traditionally don't care about them - which is why I'm surprised that Ms Goldie has chosen to show that's still the case. Her party leader is unlikely to thank her for it.
Richard Fraser
Report this comment

I am no fan of the Tories either Richard. I well remember the havock they caused last time around and cheered the night they were cast out of Scotland en masse. Indeed, pre Mrs T, I never bothered to vote, but since, have consistently voted SNP as I firmly believe Sotland could prosper as a nation state and the lot of her citizens be markedly improved.
Ron Campbell
Report this comment

There is some merit in this idea, but don't know about leaving scool at 14 though. It's more about making the education curriculum more interesting and enjoyable for a lot of kids. Some are late developers and anyone who has brought up kids will tell you that apart from a small minority, none of them really know what they want to do in life. The best any parent can hope for is that their kids grow up to be responsible adults and life long learning should always be there for everyone.
Sasha Molyneux
Report this comment

Is this the Tory vision for Scotland. Remember these are 14 year old children. What happens to them if they change their mind after 3 or six months down the line. UK policy has been to encourage 3rd world countries to put a stop to child labour so why are the Tories proposing it for Scotlands children. Why draw the line at 14 lets go for 12 year olds. Bonkers.
raymond thomson
Report this comment

Send them down the mines and up the chimneys I say!
Brian Henderson
Report this comment

Annabel wants to charge Scottish students £16,000 for their university education when honest Dave has just announced a gift of £650 million pounds for education in Packistan. Are we really that stupid?
raymond thomson
Report this comment

Yup we really are that stupid Raymond
Robert Horne
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.