watchdog reveals depth of public inquiry

Probe into embattled city council stepped up

By Calum Ross

Published: 10/04/2008

The public inquiry into the running of beleaguered Aberdeen City Council is to be more far-reaching than first thought, it emerged last night.

The council’s ability to deliver change, and the reasons why it appears not to have the backing of its staff, are to be investigated at a landmark hearing next month.

The Accounts Commission announced yesterday that the two-day public inquiry into the council’s finances and services will begin on Tuesday, May 13, in Aberdeen Town House.

Council leader Kate Dean welcomed the decision to hold it next month.

“It’s important we get the chance to update the Accounts Commission since the best-value audit,” she said.

“It’s not an inquiry into our finances.”

But the local authority watchdog said it did want to “explore” the council’s financial position, as well as its capacity to secure change, the issue of low staff morale and the pace of progress.

One piece of evidence to be submitted will be the agenda for yesterday’s full council meeting – the first time councillors have met since the hearing was announced on March 20, and since last Saturday’s protest march.

Lord Provost Peter Stephen said he would submit the agenda, which included 81 questions – half from one opposition councillor – as evidence of the way officials’ time was being spent and reform was being blocked.

Hopes were raised at the meeting of saving Doonies Farm and Lynx Ice Arena.

But the Liberal Democrat/ SNP council administration was accused of an “affront to democracy” by denying a request to speak by representatives of homeless charity Cyrenians and sheltered employment factory Glencraft.

Opposition Labour group leader Len Ironside, who was pleased the inquiry would be held “sooner rather than later”, branded the administration ignorant and arrogant.

“These people have turned up here today to present themselves to the council, given the unique circumstances with the whole city galvanised against this council, I think it would only be fair to hear them,” he said.

Tory councillor Alan Donnelly said: “I think this whole agenda has been manipulated by the administration and it’s an affront to democracy.”

Campaigners for Doonies were allowed to speak and were granted a temporary reprieve. The farm will remain open until the end of May so that backers can be found to secure its future.

And depute council leader Kevin Stewart of the SNP said private investors had approached the council to inquire about taking over the Linx Ice Arena. But it also emerged the council does not intend to reopen the Queen’s Links and Kincorth bowling greens.

Labour politicians have urged the public to contact the watchdog with concerns over the way the council is being run.

The commission confirmed it would consider any correspondence, but it wanted to maintain its focus on the recent audit of the council’s finances.

A spokeswoman said: “The commission wishes to hear first-hand from representatives of Aberdeen City Council to gain a greater understanding of the council’s difficulties in implementing its long-held vision for the area and its plans to improve its financial position.”

The council’s precarious finances yesterday forced councillors to drop plans to stage part of the Granite City Rally in Torry.

Attempting to attain a temporary lifting of speed restrictions has already cost £29,000 and potential objections leading to costly hearings in London has meant the long-held ambition will have to be put on hold again.

“We don’t know how far the cost is going to be pushed and at this time I don’t think we can go ahead,” said Mr Stewart.

Campaigners fighting to save Doonies Farm last night welcomed official confirmation that they had 60 days to come up with a business plan.

But they have to move quickly, said the chairman of Friends of Doonies.

John Sleigh added: “It is the best of a bad situation. We now know what the goalposts are and we know what to aim for. We need to kickstart the emergency funds drive.”

A fundraising meeting will be held in the Cove Bay Hotel on Colsea Road next Monday at 7.30pm. A further meeting to discuss a potential gala or open day will be held in the venue on Wednesday.

To help Doonies, e-mail savedoonies@googlemail. com or call John Sleigh on 07921 863682.

Reader's Comments

Lord Provost, I have tabled at Council Budget 2003/2004 - Appendix 3 an overall budget summary with supporting information in Appendices 2 to 4. I propose a Council Tax increase of 4% in order to present a balanced budget. No one likes increasing council taxes, but given the financial pressures facing the Council, and the many initiatives which the public wish us to pursue and which I've set out in this budget, it is the responsible thing to do. A 4% increase at the Band D level equates to an increase of 75p per week. Lord Provost, I said at the outset that this was a budget where citizens and business will see the real benefits which have begun to emerge. This Administration proposes that we will make every endeavour to restrict Council Tax increases in the next two years to no more than 5% per annum. The total 2003/04 proposed Revenue Budget has increased by over £25M in cash terms. This is a 8.1% increase. We recognise that a proportion of this increase remains ring fenced, and whilst we would always wish for more funding we are making real progress attracting additional funding and in delivering quality the Scottish Executive for further relaxation of ring fencing. Lord Provost, Members of Aberdeen City Council, I wish to move as follows:that we set a Band D Council Tax for 2003/04 of £1020.06, an increase of 4% or £39.24 per annum (75p per week). Full details of the proposed increases are shown at Council Budget 2003/2004 that we aim for Council Tax increases for the following two financial years to be no more than 5% per annum. Len Ironside Leader of the Council 13 February 2003 grame tran
grame tran
Report this comment

What does the above mean, and what has it got to do with the article. Well under previous Councils, Council taxes have gone up time and time again. This was due in a large part to over spending, and not enough financial restraint. I can’t comment on Edinburgh. I do now that no Government will throw money into a black hole. You must remember that we still have to settle the fair pay debacle which is costing 12 million. As you are all aware your council tax is now frozen, what would it be now under a Labour council? grame tran
grame tran
Report this comment

As you now Aberdeen had one of the highest council taxes in Scotland, and because of this had one of the lowest per head grants. The more money you can raise from your populous the lower the grant. "As regards the funding formula, we have used the same needs based formula we inherited when we took office. As you will know this takes into account various indicators of need including population, deprivation and rurality. These indicators are regularly uprated to ensure they take account of the most up to date figures available at the time. This methodology is agreed with COSLA with input from Directors of Finance from all Scotland’s local authorities. Finance Secretary John Swinney. Thank your previous councils for setting your council tax high.
grame tran
Report this comment

The people of Aberdeen should be under no illusion; Aberdeen should be a benchmark modern city, held in the highest regard, a beacon of hope to those that live tethered by the politics of a by-gone age. It is has been transformed by investment and wealth creation for 4 decades now. It has been fleeced by successive Scottish Administrations to prop up previously Labour’s and now the SNP’s hotchpotch policies of envy and charity. We pay the most, receive the least and our council tax bills are as high because of the vampirism when it comes to our cash of successive Holyrood administrations. If the basket case that is the Central Belt pulled its weight we’d have no council tax. Salmond has cut off our legs and now pretending to be a white Knight wants to offer us a wheel chair.
paul day
Report this comment

"The council ability to deliver change....": read the audit report, the data given to the councillors by the staff is either non-existant, carefully put together to support this staff view point or blatant lies. "The reasons why it appears not to have the backing of its staff..."; Are easy ones too, after Trade Union own figures 70 % of the council staff are labour supporters with a culture of "non compliance". In other words they just igore what they are told to do, desobey orders, and do not get fire by the spineless management despite this being gross missconduct and a firing offense. And Mr. Ironside if you dare to call the council arrogant and ignorant, don't be affected if you are call stupid, miserable, lier, and accomplice. "the issue of low staff moral..." is beggars belief as they are the best paid, with better pensions and with the highest abseentism rate and the highest inefficiency of all councils in Scotland. "the pace of progress...": Jus an impossiblity if the management and the staff are not changed or made to change.
Vincent Mc Dee
Report this comment

I’m all for “wisdom” and experience but any chance of giving the important jobs, in the future, to the “smarter” councillors. It would be a bit unfair as is it would require a perpetual Conservative / Lib Dem council. Saying that you’ve got to believe they would make a better fist of running a multi million pound enterprise. The nationalists don’t seem to offer much, couple of “politically educated” councillors and we really need those skills and a 12 year old. Maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess, just a thought.
paul day
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.