tycoon’s team predicts development will treble population of Balmedie

Trump’s resort will be home to almost 5,000

By Emma Christie

Published: 13/05/2008

Almost 5,000 people could be living on site at any one time at Donald Trump’s proposed £1billion golf development, it was revealed yesterday.

It will more than treble the 2,000 population of Balmedie where the US tycoon hopes to build two golf courses, a 450-bedroom hotel, 950 holiday homes and 500 houses on the links north of Aberdeen.

The Trump Organisation estimates in a new report that the development could be home to up to 4,971 people at any one time.

Last night the figures were welcomed by politicians and business experts who said the additional income from taxes and the extra spending power from wealthy tourists would provide “a huge economic boost” to the area.

The report, submitted by the Trump Organisation as an addition to its planning application, based its predictions on statistics from Visit- Scotland, a visitor survey conducted by Scottish Enterprise Grampian and figures relating to the average household size in Aberdeenshire.

It says 3,406 visitors and 1,565 residents are expected to live at the resort between April and September at any one time, with the number of visitors falling marginally to 3,285 from October to March, when business travellers and people attending conferences are more likely to come.

The report says the average number of visiting golfers per group would be six, and they would stay for an average of seven nights.

It expects golfers to spend most of their time in the resort while family groups “would be more inclined to visit local attractions”.

Last night, Liliana Hiris, lecturer in economics at Robert Gordon University, said the economic impact of 5,000 additional people would extend far beyond the boundaries of the resort.

She said: “It’s the whole package, it’s not just the course. The money will serve all the area.”

It would also be a major benefit to have “people with lots of money” visiting the area, said Ms Hiris.

Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce said the spending power of 5,000 more people would bring “a huge economic boost”.

A spokeswoman said the resort would be “a major selling point” for attracting conferences worth millions of pounds to the north-east.

VisitScotland said: “The people that will be attracted to this development are exactly the type of visitors we are trying to attract to Scotland as we position the country as a quality destination.”

But its spokeswoman said the development must be “sensitively managed in terms of the local environment and infrastructure”.

North-east Labour list MSP Richard Baker said the surge in visitors could bring a significant economic boost to the area, but stressed that Aberdeenshire Council, the Scottish Government and the Trump Organisation needed to “work closely” to respond to infrastructure pressure.

But Debra Storr, councillor for Ellon and district and a resident of Balmedie, said she did not believe the benefits would be far-reaching.

“In terms of bodies, it’s probably two Balmedies or half an Ellon,” she said.

“But the economic impact of this resort outside the resort will be next to nothing.”

Reader's Comments

Additional income from taxes... Which taxes will visitors pay? Will they pay any directly to the local authority?
Ubi D
Report this comment

No amount of money will compensate for the loss of an SSSI. Trump needs to realise that no amount of PR will get around the key environmental issue in this matter. Trump's plans must change to avoid development on the SSSI.
Steve H
Report this comment

Steve I think you need to look more closely to other Trump developments and he has worked with local environmental groups to produce a top class resort. I believe he will do the same in Balmedie. As for Debra Storr's comments that there would be no economic impact outwith the resort is absolutely ludicrous. She is wired to the moon i think. Of course money will be spent in other regions of Aberdeen and SHire. I recently enjoyed a weekend break at Carnoustie and met a group of 30 Americans there to play golf, not just at Carnoustie (although this was their base) but at St Andrews and down at Troon. They seemed to spend money outwith and so will people going to Balmedie.
Scott Gemmell
Report this comment

Scott - I don't doubt that the development would improve the local economy, although a Trump resort course would certainly not be as attractive to tourists as established gems such as Carnoustie, St Andrews, Troon, Royal Aberdeen, Cruden Bay, Royal Dornoch, etc. Scotland is lucky to have a wealth of fantastic golf courses, so there is no need to compromise our environmental policy for Trump's proposal to develop on the SSSI. Trump's environmental record in the US (a country with less stringent environmental protections) is suspect. Again, it is Trump PR that says he has "worked with" environmental groups. He has clearly not worked with local environmental groups, such as RSPB, in this matter. His stubborn refusal to protect the SSSI from development and his decision not to change his plans and appeal the initial rejection through the established planning process reflects his contempt for our laws and our local environment. A suitable balance between economic development and enviromental protection must be sought.
Steve H
Report this comment

Steve have you even been to Balmedie? SSSI? Its a moving sand sheet big wow,seagulls and jellyfish thats all and there is more of that all the way up to the Broch. The narrowmindedness off some people is astounding,it will be of huge economic importance to the region and other courses in the area will benifit.The current crop of courses do not have the infrastrucure to hold big events.This one will and I for one believe the people of Aberdeen and shire would love to see the likes of Tiger Woods in the flesh.
Brian Shewan
Report this comment

Scott, The economic impact outside the resort for the Aberdeenshire and the rest of Scotland is 280 jobs - Trump's own figures. Spread between taxi drivers, food and drink suppliers, some spin off tourist spend for the relatively few visitors who leave the site, that is very little. We'll hardly notice it in Aberdeenshire, in the City or in the rest of Scotland.
Debra Storr
Report this comment

I just hope there will be a school, GP surgery and everything else associated with a small community.
Donald McPherson
Report this comment

Brian - yes, I spend a fair amount of time in that area and so understand exactly why part of the land has been designated an SSSI. It is only narrow minded to suggest that the SSSI is destroyed on the fantastical promise of Tiger Woods coming to play in Aberdeenshire (in your own words, "big wow" - he already regularly appears at Carnoustie and St Andrews, just down the road). However, you raise a good point about this being a "moving sand sheet" - a problem already apparent at Royal Aberdeen and Murcar. This highlights that Trump's development may not be sustainable in the long term and raises even greater environmental concerns regarding future changes in the dune structure.
Steve H
Report this comment

This will be the biggest white elephant Britain has ever seen with disasterous consequences for the NE
Thomas Owenson
Report this comment

Why cant Aberdeen have a world class facility? If you want to watch the stars then its a trip down to the central belt,again we lose out to that area.The majority of people want this,put it to a democratic vote and see who wins.It's just the protesters have shouted loudest so far,doesn't make them right though. Why would it be a white elephant? Jobs and all the service industries will benifit.The only person to lose if indeed it does lose would be Mr Trump joe public won't lose out.Do you think all these years ago there were such protests when Royal Aberdeen,Murcar,Newburgh,Cruden Bay,Peterhead were built? Yet we say these are great courses an asset to the are,this one will be seen in the same light in years to come.
Brian Shewan
Report this comment

How many SSSI sites are there in Scotland?Hundreds and hundreds.And most of them arent that special at all.They are designated by civil servants trying to justify their jobs.Local environmental groups such as RSPB?Hardly a local group when its not even Scottish!Of course Trump should be allowed to build a development.The NIMBYs mustnt be allowed to stifle the development of this piece of waste ground.
dave north
Report this comment

To Steve H. and Debra Storr.... I am originally from Aberdeen but have lived a long time in America. As an architect, although now retired, I must ask you Steve, where you get the idea that environmenal concerns are not as stringent over here as conmpared to Scotland. I can assure you they very much are. Where in the U.S. were you? Councillor Storr, I don't know of your political agenda, but progress is not one of them.
Linda J. McArtney
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.