Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

George Galloway breached broadcasting rules with Labour anti-Semitism debate

Former MP George Galloway has been found in breach of broadcasting rules (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Former MP George Galloway has been found in breach of broadcasting rules (Gareth Fuller/PA)

George Galloway breached broadcasting rules by presenting allegations of Labour Party anti-Semitism as a concocted means to criticise Jeremy Corbyn, a watchdog has found.

The former MP’s talkRadio platform could now face sanctions including the shortening or revoking of its licence after Ofcom found Galloway was in breach of impartiality rules.

Hosting phone-ins on the Labour anti-Semitism allegations, Galloway was found to have framed the controversy as a vehicle to attack the Labour Leader, and received broad support for his view.

When he received a dissenting opinion in a text, Galloway called the sender an “ignorant woman”, and branded another listener who disagreed with him as a “rag picker”.

Galloway was found in breach on two counts over the Corbyn material. In addition to a previous broadcast on the Salisbury poisoning case, Galloway has been found in breach of the rules by Ofcom three times. The watchdog is now considering sanctions against his radio platform.

A spokesman for Ofcom said: “Our investigation found that these phone-in programmes breached our due impartiality rules. They failed to give due weight to a sufficiently wide range of views on allegations of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party.

“We are minded to consider imposing a statutory sanction for these breaches. The Licensee now has an opportunity to make representations to us, which we’ll consider before proceeding further.”

Ofcom received complaints about Galloway’s shows on July 27 and August 6 2018, prompting an investigation into due impartiality.

Jeremy Corbyn
Ofcom ruled that Galloway did not offer due impartiality in his broadcast on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn (Aaron Chown/PA)

The watchdog found that while it was legitimate to broadcast programmes in support of Corbyn, principles of balance had to be maintained.

Ofcom said it is concerned that Galloway continues to “express pride” in his broadcasts despite their content breaching rules.

TalkRadio could now face sanctions, which may include a fine of up to £250,000, in light of the fact that Galloway has been found in breach of the rules multiple times on the station.

Galloway’s show has previously breached impartiality rules with comments that aired after the Salisbury poisoning involving Yulia and Sergei Skripal.

On three occasions, when the audience contributions opposed his own views position, Galloway joked that the listeners who had sent in their dissenting messages were in Broadmoor psychiatric hospital.

Ofcom investigated a complaint that the programme, broadcast on March 16, contained “biased and unbalanced views” about the response of the UK and Russian governments to the poisoning.

Galloway said in the introduction to his July 27 show: “Jeremy Corbyn has this week been the victim of a crazed, unhinged assault by the agents of the powerful. A frenzied attack to destroy him for fear that he might win. The proximate method is the exploitation of deep-seated Jewish fear. Literally summoning up the demons of Nazism against Britain’s finest anti-fascist.”

He added later: “A pig that is the British media and political class that is frightening Jewish schoolgirls in London on a giant Goebbellian lie that Jeremy Corbyn not only hates Jews but that the existential future, the existence of Jewish life in Britain, is threatened by this mild-mannered geography teacher in his woolly jumper.”

A talkRadio spokesperson said: “You expect robust opinions from George Galloway, but we accept that on this occasion he crossed the line. As a station we understand the need for dissenting voices with a range of counter-opinions.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in