Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Guidance issued to protect Scottish farm tenants’ pre-emptive right to buy

Survey responses must be submitted by October 20
Survey responses must be submitted by October 20

Farm leaders have issued guidance on selling a company owning tenanted farms which are subject to a pre-emptive right to buy (PRTB).

The guidance has been developed by the government’s independent adviser on tenant farming, Andrew Thin, in conjunction with NFU Scotland (NFUS), Scottish Land and Estates (SLE) and the Scottish Tenant Farmers Association (STFA).

Based on existing legislation, the guidance sets out to help in situations where a company is to be sold that owns tenanted land subject to PRTB.

The issue came to the fore earlier this year when the STFA called for the sale of the 21,000-acre Tulchan Estate in Speyside to be halted because the estate’s five tenants were said to be at risk of losing their PRTB because the limited company owning the estate, rather than the land itself, was for sale.

The newly established guidance aims to create a framework for “effective dialogue” between the landlord and tenant in advance of any sale to maintain good landlord and tenant relations and ensure the tenant’s support for the sale.

Although the guidance only applies to secure 1991 Act tenancies where an interest in a PRTB has been registered, the farming organisations have recommended that all landlords notify tenants in every situation where a tenanted holding is to be sold.

The guidance states that ownership of tenanted land through a limited company should not be used as a device to “circumvent the will of Parliament” in giving secure 1991 Act tenants a statutory PRTB.

It recommends that where tenanted land is held in a limited company and a controlling interest in that company is then transferred to an unconnected party in an arm’s length transaction, the sells should consult fully with the tenants in advance of the sale.

NFUS president, Allan Bowie, said there was no excuse for the deliberate use of a holding company by landlords to evade PRTB.

“There are all sorts of circumstances where the ownership of land through a limited company can be very helpful however, and we must be careful not to inadvertently discourage these arrangements where they make good business sense,” added Mr Bowie.

SLE chairman, David Johnstone, said in instances where landlords decided to sell their interest, whether in a holding company or in title to the land itself, it was essential that “full and detailed discussions” took place with tenants in advance of the sale.

STFA chairman, Christopher Nicholson, said: “While this guidance has been developed to deal specifically with issues relating to PRTB, the underlying principle of ensuring effective consultation in advance of any sale of a landlord’s interest makes common sense to anyone concerned with maintaining good and productive landlord and tenant relationships.”

The guidance is available from all three farming organisations or online at www.gov.scot/Topics/farmingrural/Agriculture/agricultural-holdings/Tenant-Farming-Adviser