Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Expert points way ahead to making genetic improvements in herds count

Farmers were told to take steps to measure genetic progress.
Farmers were told to take steps to measure genetic progress.

Efforts to improve genetics in beef herds must focus on creating differentiated products if Scottish farmers are to see any economic benefits from driving change, according to a breeding expert.

Matthew Cleveland, director of global beef product development at Genus ABS, said genetic selection had been used for generations to develop cattle which met certain goals of producers or customers.

But he said many selections failed to provide obvious benefits to everyone in the supply chain, meaning the market was rarely prepared to pay extra for any perceived improvements.

Speaking at the British Cattle Breeders Club annual conference in Telford, Shropshire, Mr Cleveland said some genetic selections might benefit one part of the supply chain while “antagonising” others, reducing farmers’ ability to capitalise on any genetic improvements. Instead farmers needed to work on creating tailored, specific end products which had measurable value to the supply chain, he said. Only then would that added value be passed back along the supply chain to producers.

“The only way to maximise profitability is to have differentiation which results in measurable and demonstrable differences in value,” Mr Cleveland told delegates.

“As you make genetic changes, you need a clear objective and to create an end product that has clearly recognised value for a specific supply chain.”

Mr Cleveland said the beef sector had struggled to show the benefits of genetic improvements in the past, but ultimately it was the industry’s responsibility to prove that it is creating products the supply chain wants.

This meant that producers needed to understand what was important to every step in the supply chain, but also be prepared to collect large amounts of relevant data so they could prove specific outcomes.

“We need something that we can show the supply chain that proves we have created something different,” he said.

“We have a lot of segments in the industry and historically value is lost to original decision-maker. But once stakeholders see the value created they demand greater genetic differential. Farmers who identify those and act on them can benefit with larger financial rewards.”

As soon as farmers have developed a system of genetic improvements that works for their herd, it’s key that improvements are made every year using tailored selection indexes, he added.

“Once you’ve identified where to go, you want to get there as quickly as possible. The ultimate objective is profit, and that should guide your decisions,” said Mr Cleveland.