Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Climate change farming grants branded ‘a subsidised shopping list’

The under-fire scheme provides support for farmers towards the cost of buying various pieces of equipment, including cattle handling and monitoring kit.
The under-fire scheme provides support for farmers towards the cost of buying various pieces of equipment, including cattle handling and monitoring kit.

The new £10 million capital grants scheme which was devised to help the industry fight climate change has come under criticism for being no more than a subsidised shopping list.

The Scottish Government’s Sustainable Agriculture Capital Grant Scheme (SACGS) was launched on Monday with a list of equipment farmers can be supported to buy to help them “protect and improve the natural environment, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from farming operations, support sustainable farming and support sustainable land use” – but some leading producers say it is pointless without any measurable outcomes.

Robert Fleming, an award-winning beef farmer from Glenluce, and a member of the Scottish Government’s Simplification Taskforce, commented on Twitter: “When you think that finally some progress has been made and that the agricultural industry has been given a leg up to trigger real change, then you read the detail of the (SACGS) scheme. What a waste of taxpayers’ money!”

He quotes examples such as a grant for a floating slurry cover which has “no eligibility criteria that states you have to use low emission spreading” or a foot-trimming crate “but no binding criteria that you must cull that offending animal/s within a set time”.

Laurencekirk producer Ross Mitchell wrote: “Had an opportunity to really kickstart regenerative agricultural practices but instead chose to give a shopping list for all.”

Other farmers commented that government schemes should be devised to reward action not “subsidise underinvestment”, and the items on the list should be financed by businesses themselves.

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We know that this pilot scheme as currently designed will not reach all farmers and sectors and that some will be disappointed by that. But the items that can be applied for through the SACGS have been selected for their potential to contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions as well supporting sustainable farming.

“As this is a pilot we will carry out monitoring to assess the effectiveness of the scheme, asking farmers and crofters for their views on the scheme’s effectiveness – this will take account of cost and the estimated impact on greenhouse gas emission reductions.

“The feedback and the results from the monitoring will allow us to shape future policy and support mechanisms.”