Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fencing fury: Lewis crofter slams ‘fundamentally flawed’ rural department

Calum Mackay on his croft.
Calum Mackay on his croft.

A Lewis crofter has accused the Scottish Government of running a “fundamentally flawed” rural department after his application for grant support was rejected.

Calum Mackay, who runs a croft in Achmore, has written a letter outlining his grievances to Cabinet Secretary for Rural Economy and Tourism Mairi Gougeon, Western Isles MSP Alasdair Allan, and Western Isles MP Angus MacNeil.

In his letter, Mr Mackay outlines his application for financial support through the Scottish Government’s Crofting Agricultural Grant Scheme (CAGS) to erect 420-metres of fencing on his croft.

The application was submitted on February 1, 2020, and Mr Mackay had to wait five months until July 29, 2020, for a site inspection due to Covid-19 restrictions.

At the inspection, Mr Mackay said he was told there were no issues with his CAGS application and he’d be given official approval for the grant within three weeks.

“Following eight weeks of total silence I had to chase for feedback – we’re now into September – during that period I had set in a number of fence strainers at my own cost,” said Mr Mackay in his letter.

He said he decided to proceed with the fencing project in October after “weeks of constant deluge” resulted in flooding and one of his breeding gimmers drowning, however this resulted in his CAGS application being rejected.

Mr Mackay applied for CAGS support to erect 420-metres of fencing on his croft.

“I take the decision to start the project, with a view to making good use of time and having my animal welfare issue addressed,” said Mr Mackay’s letter.

“The local officer gets in touch to inform me that I no longer qualify for grant aid because I took the decision to start fencing before costs were approved – they knew all details of my application over six months prior.”

Mr Mackay said he appealed the decision “on the basic principles of fairness and reason” and was offered no opportunity to discuss the issue or find a resolution with senior managers at the Scottish Government’s Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate (SGRPID).

The appeal was rejected and in his letter, Mr Mackay said: “I realise my experience is echoed in many crofter’s frustrations.

“Therefore, I offer my example as clear evidence how a department, intended for rural development, is fundamentally flawed.”

Mr Mackay’s letter also makes reference to his three adult children and says: “My message to them is simple – do not enter crofting with the illusion that government help is ever at hand.

“SGRPID is an unaccountable, non-transparent government department with a licence to behave pretty much as they please. A scandal that needs to be addressed.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Following the submission of a complaint on our standards of service, we are investigating the background to the case and will respond to the crofter directly in due course.

“We take any complaints around our standard of service seriously and will investigate thoroughly.”

National development plan launched for crofting sector