Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Crofters seek clarity over common grazing rules

The consultation has been launched ahead of next year's commissioner elections
The consultation has been launched ahead of next year's commissioner elections

A legal challenge in England could pave the way for better support for crofters using common grazings, claims the Scottish Crofting Federation.

The crofters body is calling on Scottish Government to clarify the rules in Scotland governing subsidy support on common grazings.

This follows a legal challenge by grazing rights commoners in England over the way in which subsidy support was paid to those using the grazings.

Defra has said its rules, adopted in 2005, do not comply with European regulations and for the new Basic Payment Scheme the rules will be changed.

Those using the grazings will now be paid based on the land they manage, rather than a proportion based on their share in the common grazings.

SCF director Joyce Wilkinson said: “This has potentially given crofting common grazings share-holders a chance to redress what many see as the injustice of being only paid on a proportion of the land they actually manage. This is particularly rankling in comparison when a farmer on the next hill, quite rightly, receives full payment for all the non-common grazing they have stock on.

“Crofting is shrouded in the complexity of crofting legislation and regulations that few officials can really be expected to be fully to grips with, but SCF has long sought for a route to fair payments to be devised despite this. There must be an answer to whether crofters can be paid for their actual activity, which could attract more crofters back into using the common grazing and revitalise the hills.”

Highlands and Islands MSP, Jean Urquhart, backed the calls for clarity and called on Scottish Government to change its rules in the same way Defra has.

“Developments in England confirm the principle that payments should be made on all common grazing shares, and that those payments should go to the crofters who are active on the grazings,” said Ms Urquhart, who is deputy convenor of the Scottish Parliament’s cross-party group on crofting.

“The Scottish Government has already made progress in ending subsidies to those who are not actively working the land. But that only goes halfway if the money doesn’t go instead to the active farmers who need it.

“I hope the Scottish ministers will now make the same change that Defra has made. Not only is this fair, it could be the catalyst that will encourage people back to the land and greatly assist in meeting the Scottish Government’s ambition to increase the number of small farmers and crofters.”

She urged government to work with crofters and common grazing committees to identify all eligible shares, to ensure crofters got all of the funds they were entitled to.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “We have noted the legal challenge in England, however the whole system for claiming subsidy in relation to Common Land in England is different from that applying to Common Grazings in Scotland where we have already brought in new minimum activity rules to ensure only active farmers and crofters qualify for direct payments.

“This is a complex issue and, although we do not currently envisage any implications for our own approach in Scotland, we will discuss with industry representatives as well as carefully monitoring what happens in England to check for any effects it may have here.”