Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MSPs to hear from farmers on Cap and SAF woes

Government is to consider setting up a dairy industry task force
Government is to consider setting up a dairy industry task force

MSPs are set to hear evidence from farmers on how Common Agricultural Policy (Cap) implementation and the new online Single Application Form (Saf) process is going.

A number of figures from the farming sector will speak at a meeting of Holyrood’s rural affairs, climate change and environment (Racce) committee tomorrow.

Among those giving evidence at the meeting is north-east farmer and chairman of NFU Scotland’s livestock committee, Charlie Adam.

He will be joined by the chairman of the Scottish Beef Association, Scott Henderson, Russell Smith from the Scottish Crofting Federation and various other farmers.

Papers released ahead of the meeting reveal the committee has previously raised concerns over the government’s new Rural Payments and Services website.

The MSPs state: “The committee fully supported the Scottish Government’s desire to ensure that the new Cap and SRDP were simpler and more easily accessible than their predecessor schemes. The committee is concerned that this has not been realised in the design of the schemes.

“It is essential that the required IT and other administrative support systems are in place, and have been fully tested, to ensure these are robust, in good time for payments to be made to those who depend on them for their livelihoods, and in order for the many outputs which depend on the payments to be delivered.”

The committee said “the proof of the pudding will be in the eating” and its appraisal of how Cap delivery is going will be based on the experience of farmers and their advisers.

The government’s implementation of Cap reform has been shrouded in controversy.

A report released earlier this year by the auditor general for Scotland, Caroline Gardner, suggested the government’s five-year Futures Programme, designed to implement Cap reform, will cost £178million, up 74% or £75.5million from the original budget drawn up in March last year. The largest area of spend was on the IT delivery partner – up 111% from the original estimated cost to £60.4million, from £28.8million previously.

It was also revealed last month that the Home Office was called in to investigate whether or not contracted IT workers tasked with developing the Rural Payments and Services website had the necessary visas to work in the UK.

This was revealed by a former contractor who worked on the site’s development, John Dunning, who previously said problems raised with the system had been ignored by government.