Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Landowners: MSPs warned of possible effect of land reform bill

Charles Pearson of Dunecht Estates
Charles Pearson of Dunecht Estates

The Scottish Government has been warned it is in real danger of forcing landlords away from letting farms.

A group of eight landowners – including Dunecht Estates, Moray Estates and the MacRobert Trust – have sent an open letter to farm minister Richard Lochhead expressing their concern about proposals in the upcoming land reform bill.

The letter says: “Regardless of the scale of our operations or our type of ownership, what unites us is fear of what may become of the tenant farming sector in Scotland should certain proposed amendments to the bill in relation to agricultural holdings go ahead.”

They warn against a proposal to allow secure 1991 act tenants to assign their tenancy for value, describing it as a “discriminatory measure” against landowners.

The original recommendation from the government’s agricultural holdings legislation review group was for secure tenants to be able to convert their tenancies into a long-term tenancy, which could then be assigned for value. The latest proposal expands on this and would allow tenants to sell secure tenancies on.

“Even with a right for the landlord to buy the tenant out, albeit at a higher price than a tenant would pay, the reality is that many will not be able to afford to buy back farmland and buildings which, of course, they already own,” said the landowners.

“Surely this cannot be a balanced approach and how many landlords will re-let once they have bought out the tenant? Landlords see this as nothing more than a discriminatory measure driven mainly be a desire from some quarters for the bill to be made more radical.”

They warned the proposals were likely to face challenge as they were a fundamental breach of property rights, however they stressed their letter was not a threat to government but instead a plea for the land reform bill to strike the right balance of property rights.

“The Scottish Government is in real danger of forcing landlords away from letting,” said the landowners.

“Those of us whose businesses have the letting of farms at their core are acutely aware that agricultural landlords will not be in any way attracted to let land on a long-term in the face of such an unwarranted measure. The impact of such a measure will not be good for tenant farming and therefore Scottish agriculture.”

The other signatories of the letter were Atholl Estates, Buccleuch Estates, Dormont Estate, Dunfallandy Estate and Kirkdale Estate.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman responded and said: “The agricultural holdings provisions in the land reform bill have been designed as a package of measures to improve security and investment conditions for existing tenants, to deliver the environment to create tenancies for new entrants, and to ensure an appropriate balance between tenants’ and landlords’ rights.”