Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Future of Peterhead Power Station under threat

Post Thumbnail

The future of Peterhead’s iconic power station is under threat after SSE announced its operations are under review.

Around 90 members of staff face losing their jobs at the energy company with a number of contractors also facing an uncertain future.

Scottish energy minister Paul Wheelhouse said the move was “worrying” for the UK’s energy security and claimed ministers would be “negligent” if Peterhead’s capacity was put out of use.

SSE declined to speak to the Press and Journal yesterday, but the firm revealed the gas plant is faced with the review after it failed to be chosen to supply capacity to the UK grid in the event of an energy shortage.

Last night Banff and Buchan MP Eilidh Whiteford, SNP, said the move had “serious” implications and said she was seeking “urgent talks with SSE and staff”.

She said: “This has serious implications for Peterhead power station and I will be seeking urgent talks with SSE and staff representatives to clarify the implications of this decision.”

Peter Chapman, north -east region MSP, also said he was writing to the firm to seek “clarification” on what this means for the future of the plant and the workers in the north east.

Uncertainty has plagued the power station since the UK government controversially scrapped a £1billion plan that could have seen Peterhead used in a groundbreaking carbon capture and storage (CCS) project.

This was expected to have created hundreds of jobs in the area.

Although the gas station has capacity to produce over 1,000 mega-watts of electricity, SSE said it failed to win business in the UK capacity auction for the third time in a row.

And they said its remote location means it is at a “disadvantage” because it must pay significantly higher costs to transmit energy to the grid than other power stations on the electricity system.

In a statement SSE said: “The fact that Peterhead has failed to secure a contract in any of the three previous capacity market auctions, and other economic considerations, SSE will be reviewing future options for the station over the coming months and will engage with all stakeholders during this review.”

Mr Wheelhouse said: “SSE’s announcement that the future of Peterhead power station is under review is worrying.

“It exposes deep flaws in UK energy policy and highlights the real damage caused by high transmission charges.

“The Scottish Government and its agencies will work closely with SSE as they undertake their review to explore all options to secure a positive future for Peterhead and its workforce.”

Mr Wheelhouse said he wanted “urgent action” to be taken to safeguard the future of Peterhead Power Station.

He added: “The UK Government claims it wants more gas power stations, but there appears to be no mechanism to secure the future of existing capacity in Scotland or to address the damaging effects of high transmission charges that penalise generation in Scotland and risk our security of supply.

“I call on the UK Energy Secretary and system operator National Grid to take urgent action to safeguard Peterhead and to ensure Scotland’s energy security.

“For UK Ministers to fail to do so would be negligent and constitute a severe dereliction of duty given the importance of a plant such as Peterhead.”

He said a meeting of the Scottish Energy Advisory Board will meet next week to consider SSE’s plans.

Stuart Haszeldine, professor of Carbon Capture and Storage at Edinburgh University called for an urgent review of Scotland’s energy capacity in the wake of its possible closure.

He added that SSE’s review was an “inevitable consequence” of the UK’s national transmission charge pricing scheme which makes supplying energy from Peterhead more expensive.

He said it also makes Scotland too reliant on England to meet energy shortages.

“This needs to be very serious and urgently examined,” he said.

“Scotland is now dependent on capacity from England in emergency and very often during routine operations over which there is no local control,” he added.

He warned it would be “premature” to get rid of the plant altogether as power stations in Scotland, such as Longannet, has already closed and the nuclear power station in Ayr, Hunterston B, also faced uncertainty.

“If Peterhead is too close for lack of commercial contract, then this should be mothballed so that it can be recommissioned within days if needed,” he said.

“Many power plants will close across the UK during the next five years, and in Scotland it is unclear how long Hunterston nuclear will continue.

“There could easily be a circumstance where rapid power generation, regionally, is needed within hours or days. And that is when Peterhead can be re-opened.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in