Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Serica Energy rejects new £1.15bn bid from North Sea rival Kistos

Kistos executive chairman Andrew Austin and Serica Energy CEO Mitch Clegg.
Kistos executive chairman Andrew Austin and Serica Energy CEO Mitch Clegg.

Serica Energy has knocked back a new cash and share-for-share takeover bid from North Sea rival Kistos.

The proposed deal is worth £1.15 billion and, if successful, would have ousted Serica chief executive Mitch Flegg.

It would also have seen Andrew Austin, executive chairman of Kistos, become CEO of the combined business, with Serica chairman Tony Craven Walker leading the board.

Shareholders offered £2.13 and Kistos shares

Kistos had an earlier, £1bn bid rejected on July 12 and wrote to Serica on July 22 to outline its updated proposal, for which details emerged today. The latest plan offered £2.13 plus 0.4 Kistos shares for each unit of Serica stock.

London-headquartered Kistos said it equated to a revised offer of £4.25 per Serica share, representing a premium of £3.57 per unit as of the closing price on July 22.

Serica noted the 11% increase in value overall but said the brunt of the rise was driven by the jump in Kistos’ share price since July 11.

Serica Energy’s Bruce platform at night.<br />Submitted pic

Rejected the revised offer, which it said still undervalued the company, Serica added the proposed takeover would mean a change in leadership “during a crucial period for the industry”.

Serica also praised its management team for a 1,120% share price rise over the past five years.

It added the Kistos offer took no account of its investment plans or the potential of its North Eigg exploration well.

Serica also decried the proposed cash payment of £2.13 per share, saying the 67p shareholder distribution it includes would be coming out of its own coffers, not Kistos’.

Serica’s Bruce platform.

London-based Serica added: “Following careful consideration, the board of Serica, together with its financial advisers, has unanimously rejected the Kistos revised possible offer.

“The board reiterates its position that it will not recommend any deal on terms which it believes are unattractive to its shareholders and wider stakeholders.

“Serica shareholders are strongly advised not to take any action.”

Deal doldrums?

Kistos’ previous offer for Serica was also rejected due to it undervaluing the company.

Serica then made a counter-offer for Kistos. It was also rejected due to valuation concerns and Kistos being unable to retain its board.

As of July 15 2022, Serica had 271,960,864 shares in circulation, according to its website.

Under the revised terms from Kistos, Serica shareholders would own about 58% of the total issued share capital.

Different perspectives

Kistos said its proposal would give Serica access to a “stronger continental European gas market”.

Serica – whose shares were up by more than 5% at £3.75 at today’s London market close, has previously described Kistos’ overtures as an “opportunistic reaction” to the recent disconnect in gas prices between the UK and mainland Europe.

But Kistos – down nearly 1% at £5.25 – has said a merger of the two firms would deliver a “leading independent North Sea champion”, with “strong industrial logic” unlocking value creation and scale.

Both firms have until August 9 under UK takeover rules to either make a firm offer or say they do not intend to do so.

Serica is on record as saying it supports a mergers and acquisitions deal to deliver growth.

But earlier this month it said its boardroom team “will not recommend any deal on terms which it believes are unattractive to its shareholders and wider stakeholders”.

Conversation