Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Red tape and planning costs holding back north-east housebuilding

Construction growth has stalled
Construction growth has stalled

Property experts have voiced concerns that residential development in the north-east is being held back by regulations faced by housebuilders and the scale of contributions sought by local authorities.

Aberdeen-based planning and development specialists working for Knigh Frank delivered the findings of their residential land development research to an industry audience in the Granite City yesterday.

Their presentation included a review of residential development in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire as well as a focus on the role of local authorities and the planning system.

A key part of the research was a study of threats to the delivery of future residential development – and the burden placed on housebuilders during the planning process was high on the list.

Eric Shearer, a partner in the Aberdeen office of Knight Frank, said: “The north-east may have one of the strongest economies in the UK but the lengthy planning process for housing developments, particularly for large masterplanned sites, is delaying the construction of much needed housing.

“The requirements for developer contributions as they stand do not take into account the fall in the oil price and the wide-ranging disparities in land prices across the region. There is strangely no relationship between the cost and the ability to pay.”

He added: “In our experience, the cost of planning gain of a site in Peterhead may amount to or equal 50% of the land value but in Westhill it is only 14%.

“Developers in many instances are facing considerable delays in obtaining planning consents and this requires to be given a higher priority by the councils if the supply issues are to be properly addressed.

“While there is an acceptance of developer contributions, we would advocate a more consistent and realistic approach to help ease the logjam in the residential development pipeline.”