Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

What price for Brazil to win?

Paul the octopus got the World Cup winner right in 2010
Paul the octopus got the World Cup winner right in 2010

As with every top sporting event, lots of people have been trying to predict the results of the Fifa World Cup currently being contested in Brazil.

The smart money, according to economists at Goldman Sachs, one of the world’s biggest investment banks, is on the host nation to pick up the trophy on July 13 and Argentina to finish a distant second.

England has a 1.4% chance of winning, according to the bank, but as I am writing this before their second group match their fate could be sealed before it appears in print.

Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking has used a scientific method to calculate that England’s best chance lies with a 4-3-3 formation, temperate weather conditions, a European referee and kicking off at 3pm. He also backs Brazil to win.

Who can forget Paul the captive German octopus, who correctly predicted the results of all of Germany’s matches in the 2010 World Cup and also correctly tipped Spain to win it.

People go to great lengths to make credible predictions but it is rarely worth the effort because they are seldom accurate.

A more meaningful alternative to making individual predictions is to use the aggregate of all the analysis in the market, as expressed in bookmakers’ odds. Brazil is currently the strong favourite.

A similar thought process can be applied to investment. We do not believe it is possible to reliably predict future events and think it is a waste of money to attempt to do so.

We assume that all the relevant information has been taken account of by all the parties to a market and we trust the aggregate of all the analysis.

That aggregate is expressed as the price of individual securities, whether shares, bonds or property, and is the most reliable expression of that investment’s prospects and expected returns.

If you still think that picking individual securities or employing a skilled active fund manager to do so for you is a more reliable method, I would recommend reading the most recent discussion paper from the Pensions Institute in London.

If you don’t have time to read all 30 pages, the summary is that your odds of picking an active fund manager that will beat the market it invests in over the long-term are far worse than backing Honduras to win the World Cup.

Barry O’Neill is investment director with financial planning and investment advice firm Carbon Financial Partners. He can be contacted on 01224 619215.