Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Subsidy cuts could spell end for new hydroelectric schemes

Post Thumbnail

The development of new hydroelectric power schemes will no longer be economically viable if the UK Government continues to cut subsidies, a London-based investment fund has warned.

Hydro schemes have been an attractive proposition for cautious investors as they use established technology, have a predictable output and are designed to last 50 years with little maintenance, said David Freeder, an investment manager at Downing.

The government sweetened the deal further in 2010, when it introduced the feed-in tariff (FiT) system, which dishes out fixed-rate payments for electricity generated by small-scale schemes, including solar, wind and hydro.

However, in 2012, Westminster brought in a “degression” mechanism to reduce subsidies on the basis that renewable technologies should get cheaper as megawatt capacity builds.

Mr Freeder, whose London-based fund has invested a total of £20million in seven hydro schemes in Scotland over the past 18 months, said a repeat of last year’s 20% reduction in FiT would make the sector unappealing to investors.

He added: “To date, (the lowering of subsidies) has meant that developers have had to think very hard about the costs of projects and keeping on top of those.

“We’re now at a point where if the feed-in tariff review doesn’t come out favourably, it will get harder and harder for developers to actually find projects that are economical.

Hydropower supporters believe the sector is being subjected to an unfair level of degression.

According to Mr Freeder, the costs associated with complex run-of-river schemes have not come down at the same rate as is the case with solar power, for example, which has benefited from the import of cheap panels made in the Far East.

Industry bodies recently appealed to the Department of Energy and Climate Change to base degression solely on installed capacity, increase the pre-accreditation window by between six and 12 months, and provide a grace period for projects that are delayed through no fault of the developer.

Joss Blamire, senior policy manager at Scottish Renewables, said: “Private finance, particularly funds seeking long-term returns from a stable asset, is increasingly looking to the hydro sector to deliver.

“To continue to ensure investors have confidence in the ability of our oldest electricity-generating renewable technology we need the UK Government to ensure there is long-term support available to the sector.

“Hydro already delivers the equivalent of 14% of the electricity we use in Scotland and, with the right government support, delivered through a predictable framework, the sector can continue to thrive.”