Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Wind farm development costs spiral

The cost of launching wind farm projects has increased dramatically in recent years.
The cost of launching wind farm projects has increased dramatically in recent years.

The cost of getting permission to go ahead with offshore wind farm projects has skyrocketed for developers in recent years, while the amount of time taken to process applications has doubled, two studies published today have revealed.

Average planning consent costs went up 15%, from £15,400 to £17,600 per megawatt, between the first leasing round which started in 2000, and the second round which got under way three years later, according to “Managing Regulatory and Consenting Costs for Offshore Wind,” a study produced for green energy industry body RenewableUK.

Developing a wind farm is already a pricey undertaking, even without these added costs being factored in. An earlier report published on behalf of the Crown Estate property portfolio, titled “A Guide to an Offshore Wind Farm,” said that developing a 500 megawatt wind farm costs about £60million.

Red tape is also holding back developers. The first study said an environmental statement for a round one wind farm came in at 300 pages, while a recently submitted document broke the 12,000 page-barrier.

Developers also had to wait on average 73 months for planning decisions to be reached in the second leasing round, instead of 36 months in the first, according to a second study commissioned by RenewableUK, called “Consenting Preparedness of Offshore Wind Stakeholders: Survey and Recommendations.”

The findings, which have been released against the backdrop of the UK government’s drive to increase renewable energy consumption from 3% to 15% by 2020, have prompted industry experts to call for the demands placed on developers to be relaxed.

Nick Medic, RenewableUK’s director of offshore renewables, said: “Offshore wind is a great British success story, already accounting for thousands of UK jobs. However, for it to fully develop as a sector, we understand that costs need to come down. The industry is working hard on this, but we need the government to do their part and make certain that the planning system functions in an efficient and timely manner, ensuring that the important needs of guaranteeing environmental protection are coupled with an efficient process which keeps costs down for the consumer.

“It is reasonable to expect that with the accumulation of experience, having built 1,183 turbines in UK waters, we should start seeing a consenting process with less red tape, resulting in savings of time and money,” he said.