Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fears over child protection concerns not being properly investigated

The children's commissioner expressed its concerns in writing to the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) in November last year.
The children's commissioner expressed its concerns in writing to the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) in November last year.

Concerns have been raised over how the regulatory body for teaching in Scotland is dealing with child protection issues.

The Children’s Commissioner (CYPCS) – who works to protect the human rights of children and young people – has voiced his concerns.

Bruce Adamson contacted the Scottish Government earlier this year to raise concerns about the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS). He said it was “not acting in accordance with national child protection guidance”.

The CYPCS expressed its concerns after writing to the GTCS in November last year.

‘Two specific concerns’

In a letter to the GTCS’s director of regulation and legal services, the CYPCS’s head of investigations said he had received “a number of enquiries relating to child protection and safeguarding in education”. He raised “two specific concerns”.

Firstly, that the language used in response to referrals – particularly ‘frivolous’ and ‘vexatious’ – may give individuals the impression that their referral lacks any merit or substance.

And secondly, that referrals which may contain information amounting to a child protection concern may have been passed back to the complainer, rather than referred to the appropriate investigatory authorities.

The General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) has come under fire for its handling of child protection concerns.

The Press and Journal has heard concerns that some complaints are being passed back to councils.

Complaints passed back to councils would effectively mean local authorities investigating themselves.

The GTCS’s director of regulation and legal services responded in December.

GTCS admits ‘unhelpful’ language

In response to the CYPCS’s concern about language, the GTCS admitted that words such as ‘frivolous’ were “unhelpful”.

GTCS director of regulation and legal services Jennifer Macdonald said: “We have identified that the use of the word ‘frivolous’ in this context is unhelpful. We will look to change this when the Fitness to Teach Rules are next reviewed.”

She added this would require a public consultation and approval from the Lord President of the Court of Session.

The current strategic plan is in place until 2023. The GTCS says planning will begin “soon” for the next period.

Ms Macdonald also addressed the CYPCS’s second point of concern, around the risk of child protection concerns not being properly dealt with.

She said the GTCS doesn’t have a “specific statutory responsibility” regarding child protection or safeguarding issues.

She added: “The system as a whole has to rely on employers getting it right and having trust and confidence in them to do so.”

‘Identified areas we can make improvement’

The GTCS had reviewed “no further action” referrals made to them by members of the public since 2019.

Ms Macdonald said: “The vast majority of those have come from parents who have direct contact with the school and can readily raise their concerns with a teacher’s employer.”

She added: “Having reviewed the member of the public referrals since 2019 which were not investigated, we are content with the decision making but this process of evaluation has identified some areas where we think we can make some improvement.”

The CYPCS said the Scottish Government had agreed to follow up with the GTCS to “establish their practice”.

Scottish Government responds

A spokeswoman said the Scottish Government discussed these concerns with the GTCS. She added they have been “reassured by what they have shared with us”.

“Every council is expected to have in place appropriate child protection policies and procedures to deal with any concerns raised.

“The GTCS recognises it has an important role in child and public protection and that the national child protection guidance has a strengthened focus on children’s rights, engagement and collaboration with families.

“The Scottish Government engages with the GTCS on child protection issues on an ongoing basis.”

More from the Schools and Family team