Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Banned pesticides may be used to save beet crop

Sugar beet crops are being damaged by beet yellows virus, carried by aphids, which could be managed with banned pesticides
Sugar beet crops are being damaged by beet yellows virus, carried by aphids, which could be managed with banned pesticides

Banned pesticides could be used to tackle an outbreak of a virus spread by aphids that is harming sugar beet crops, Environment Secretary George Eustice has said.

Tory MP James Wild said sugar beet farmers in his North-West Norfolk constituency have warned their crops are being damaged by beet yellows virus and are asking for a temporary easing of rules around the use of neonicotinoid pesticides.

In 2013, the EU restricted the use of three neonicotinoids – Clothianidin, Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam – on a number of crops, followed by a ban on outdoor use in 2018.

Responding during environment questions, Mr Eustice told the Commons: “The government recognises that sugar beet growers face yield losses this year because of the difficulties in controlling aphids.

“We do support the restrictions on neonicotinoids to protect pollinators but we’ve also always been clear that we remain open to applications for emergency authorisations under the current rules.”

Earlier, Labour’s Seema Malhotra called for the government to commit to protecting UK food standards by including an assurance on the face of the Environment Bill.

Ms Malhotra told MPs: “The secretary of state is right that their manifesto promised not to compromise on food standards in trade deals but twice the government have refused to support Labour amendments to put this into law.

“So if over 70% of people don’t want us selling food imported from countries with lower food standards and over one million people have signed a petition from the National Farmers’ Union for British food standards to be put into law, why are they refusing to do what the public wants and what the public expects? The country has a right to know.”

Mr Eustice replied: “Well, in retained EU law we have indeed put in place the existing prohibitions on the sales of poultry washed by chlorine, for instance, with beef treated with hormones.

“We have legal prohibitions and our own legal bans on certain practices, those will remain in place and will not change.”