Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish Government overspends by £75.5m on Cap reform implementation

The scheme is designed to support sheep farmers in remote areas
The scheme is designed to support sheep farmers in remote areas

The cost of implementing Common Agricultural Policy (Cap) reform in Scotland has spiralled once more, according to a government audit.

A report delivered to the Scottish Parliament this week by the auditor general for Scotland, Caroline Gardner, estimates that the Scottish Government’s five-year Futures Programme – designed to implement Cap reform – will cost £178million, up 74% or £75.5million from the original budget drawn up in March last year.

The projected overspend totals nearly as much as the combined budget allocation for the beef package (£45million), new entrants support scheme (£20million) and crofting support scheme (£14million) under the new Scottish Rural Development Programme.

It is also more than the government’s projected Pillar 1 direct payments budget for the north-east in 2019, which is expected to be 94million euros or £68.04million.

The region will be one of the worst hit following the move from historic to area-based payments, with the budget set to fall 29.6million euros (£21.43million) from payments of around 123.6million euros (£89.47million) in 2011.

The auditor’s report found that £84.2million had been spent on the project to the end of February 2015, of which £55million was spent in the 2014/15 financial year.

It said the largest area of spend was on the IT delivery partner – up 111% from the original estimated cost to £60.4million, from £28.8million previously.

According to the report, as at April 13, 2015, 435 Single Application Forms had been fully submitted, with 3,174 being drafted.

“This compares to previous year figures at this date of 1,914 full submitted application forms and 1,723 being drafted,” said the report.

However, figures given to the Press and Journal by a Scottish Government official on April 16 do not tally up with the report.

When asked how many farmers had started to fill in a SAF, a government spokesman said that as of April 13, 4,492 farmers had started their SAF online, which was around “10% more than the same period last year”.

Combining the report’s figures for fully submitted and draft forms gives a total of 3,609, which is 883 less than the figure stated by government officials to the press.