Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Whyte ordered to read out claims on conduct

Whyte ordered to read out claims on conduct

SHAMED former Rangers owner Craig Whyte was forced yesterday to read out a letter in court claiming he treated his wife “in an appalling way” and his Highland castle was a target for terrorists.

The correspondence, allegedly written by his former housekeeper, Jane Hagan, also said the bank was poised to repossess Castle Grant and that Mr Whyte could have been facing jail for his “illegal activities”.

Mr Whyte read the letter from the witness stand at Inverness Sheriff Court, where Hagan and fellow former castle worker Terence Horan are on trial.

The pair are accused of stealing items worth thousands of pounds from Castle Grant – the former football boss’s Highland home at Grantown – which he had discovered were missing when he returned from a holiday.

They deny the charges.

Mr Whyte appeared uncomfortable as he read the three-page letter – said to have been written by Hagan to a friend. It appears to lift the lid on the troubles he faced as his ill-fated time with the Ibrox club ended. Fiscal depute Heather Swan asked Mr Whyte, 42, to read the letter as it contained what the prosecution believes to be a “confession” by Hagan, 51, that items were being taken from the castle as the couple had not been paid.

The court heard the letter ended: “We are going to take some of the high-value things as it looks as if the bailiffs will take the rest and we want to be sure we don’t lose out.” The letter also said staff were given anti-terrorist training as the castle was a target for attacks.

Sheriff Gilchrist heard Horan, 54, had rented a storage container, which had been filled with a huge array of household items, some belonging to Mr Whyte and some to his estranged wife, Kim.

Mr Whyte and his wife had separated three years earlier and last year he noticed some items were missing from the castle, including a huge kitchen table.

He said he had discovered more things missing when he returned from a holiday with his two children, and his wife said she had not taken them.

Whyte made a list of the missing items and alerted the police, the court was told. His housekeeper and caretaker were nowhere to be found and he had to hire a locksmith to break into his own home before changing the locks.

Mr Whyte and his then girlfriend searched the building and found a computer, with the letter allegedly written by Hagan beside it. Police obtained a search warrant and many of the items were found in a container at Grantown belonging to Hagan and Horan, who now live at Bicester, Oxfordshire.

Mr Whyte told the court: “I was with the police and pointed out some things which belonged to either myself or my wife. I did not order their removal, nor did I instruct anyone to store them or hide them.”

He also denied tampering with the letter. “I didn’t doctor it, edit or make changes to it,” he said.

The trial was adjourned until October 23, when Mr Whyte will be questioned by defence solicitors.

Mr Whyte then moved from the witness box to the dock to answer a contempt-of-court allegation for failing to appear for the trial when it had been due to start on June 10.

A warrant had been issued for his arrest but never executed and an arranged attendance was fixed.

His lawyer, Paul Kavanagh, apologised on Mr Whyte’s behalf and said the non-appearance was not wilful but “a genuine misunderstanding.”

Sheriff Gilchrist took no further action and made no finding of contempt – but he warned Mr Whyte that he had to attend court to finish his evidence.