Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Planning application affecting Kirkwall care home deferred for second time

The Corse West site.
The Corse West site.

Orkney councillors have once again deferred their decision on a planning application affecting a new care home for Kirkwall.

The council’s planning committee met this morning to discuss the council’s own proposals for roads and infrastructure in the Corse West area, west of Kirkwall.

These would be used for a planned 138-house development.

However, the proposals include a drainage detention basin that would be crucial for a new care home to the north-west of the site.

The last time councillors viewed the application, on December 1, they weren’t happy.

They said the proposed roads were likely to be used by traffic more than the council intended.

There was particular concern over the use of Muddisdale Road for the new housing area.

The road is a popular route with walkers and is used by children on their way to school. The plans also received 25 objections from people living in the area.

At this morning’s meeting, council planners came back with proposals carrying additional measures to meet these concerns.

This included road widening, more street lighting and two build-outs put in the road, all at Muddisdale.

There would also be measures to reduce the speed of cyclists at the length of cycle path joining Muddisdale. Despite these additional measures some councillors still weren’t satisfied.

Traffic mitigation measures fail to satisfy councillors

Councillor Sandy Cowie, who moved for a site visit, said he felt the potential solutions were looking increasingly expensive. He said: “The real solution is to not have the egress onto Muddisdale at all.”

He said many other areas in Kirkwall have managed fine with only one means of access.

Councillor David Dawson

Councillor David Dawson, who eventually moved to refuse the application, had suggested that bollards could be used to create limited access for bin lorries and emergency vehicles to the new houses.

However, this was shot down by council officers.

Mr Dawson said he isn’t against the proposals per se but has “serious reservations” about the need for two access roads.

He said it seemed to him that “any other option than the Muddisdale Road access is likely to be ruled out at any cost”.

He said: “The mitigation measures don’t offer me any comfort. All they do is strengthen my belief that the development of Muddisdale Road is totally unnecessary.”

Chairman has casting vote – twice

Councillor Dawson took issue with the view that 25 objections are not of sufficient weight to merit refusal of the application. He said that, while they may be evidentially light, cumulatively the objections offer significant concern.

He added: “I feel that the voice of householders offers little against the thunder of developers.”

The conclusion of the meeting saw an even split between councillors, not just once but twice.

Committee chairman Rob Crichton had the final say both times.

An initial vote was held to either refuse or approve the application.

With five members having voted for each option, Mr Crichton had the casting vote. He said that this was something he has only had to do twice before.

However, it was only minutes before he had to do it again, this time on whether the application should be approved or deferred pending a site visit.

Already a subscriber? Sign in



More from the Press and Journal News team

More from the Press and Journal