Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

New council HQ branded a £37million “white elephant” at time of budget cuts

Harlaw Park could become the new home of Aberdeenshire Council.
Harlaw Park could become the new home of Aberdeenshire Council.

Controversial plans to relocate Aberdeenshire Council’s HQ stalled yesterday amid concerns about investing £37million on a potential “white elephant”.

Opposition councillors moved to block the plans to shift to Inverurie and questioned the timing of the project given the looming budget cuts.

But the SNP-led administration believe leaving the ageing Woodhill House in Aberdeen for a modern, purpose-built facility will save money in the long-term.

Last month they revealed plans to relocate to the town’s Harlaw Park, which is currently home of Inverurie Loco Works FC.

The new headquarters would have a floor space of nearly 100,000 sq ft made up of offices, meetings and a civic space. If approved, construction could begin in 2019 with the offices open by 2021.

Yesterday, members of the policy and resources committee met for talks on how to progress with the project.

Opposition councillors branded the new-build as a “white elephant”, and questioned the strength of the business case behind the move.

Councillor Karen Clark, deputy leader of the Alliance opposition group, insisted the committee did not have enough information to make a decision.

“I think this is being presented as a done deal which is troubling,” the Liberal Democrat leader said. “It became a political football in the Inverurie by-election to win votes.

“It’s about fundamentals – why are we moving? As taxpayers, we have to be convinced it is the right thing to do. There are many risks and many assumptions.”

Mrs Clark said she was unconvinced that a “bespoke headquarters” for 1,500 staff could be built at the same cost as a new academy.

She added: “We need to be very careful on what we’re signing up to.”

She was backed by fellow Banchory councillor Jill Webster, who said: “The big question for me is will this just be a big white elephant? I was pretty disturbed there were so many omissions in the report for us to make decisions.

“Most residents don’t care about where the HQ is. They want decent services, decent leisure facilities and even decent public toilets.”

And Ellon councillor Isobel Davidson added: “There could be a public perception that while everyone else is having they services cut the council is building itself a nice new HQ.”

But council officers and administration members reiterated that the move could save the taxpayer money by cutting costs.

Chief executive Jim Savege said: “I’ve been very clear to the team that the priority is spending money on providing services not on maintaining buildings.

“Fundamentally public services will still need to be provided, offices for staff will need to be provided.”

Council co-leader Richard Thomson said he was sick of hearing about the “strange species” of white elephants during the debate, and insisted the current Woodhill House site is outdated.

He was backed up by provost and fellow SNP councillor Hamish Vernal, who proposed the committee approve the business case for the Harlaw Park plan and take the proposal to the next stage.

Mr Vernal said: “In terms of a white elephant we don’t want one in Aberdeenshire. We’ve got one in Aberdeen – we’re sitting in it. Its about decentralising and dispersing our staff.

“You need to be fleet of foot. What we’re being asked for is approval for the next stage to get the detail you asked for. Time is of the essence.”

Mr Vernal’s motion won by majority vote but the Alliance members forced the final decision on how to progress to be taken by full council.

The Alliance is currently the largest block of members in the chamber and could block the proposals.