Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

£40,000 report needed to allow “fair” judgement of council at ballot box

Marie Boulton
Marie Boulton

A senior Aberdeen councillor has insisted a controversial magazine about the authority’s work will make sure voters are properly informed.

Marie Boulton – an independent member who is part of Aberdeen’s Labour-led ruling coalition – said it would be wrong for May’s election to be based on “whispers”.

But the SNP says the proposed £40,000 taxpayer-funded “legacy” report is party political propaganda which “whitewashes” the record of the Labour-led authority.

Its bid to require a “warts and all” version of the document – due to be sent to every household ahead of polling day – was rejected by a committee this week.

But depute leader Mrs Boulton rejected the claims, and likened the document to the White Paper issued by the SNP government before the independence referendum.

“The people will judge,” she said. “But we have to give them the information to judge us fairly, rather than a whisper here or a whisper there.

“If they disagree with it, they can challenge it and not lend us their vote.”

She added: “It’s good to quantify what your five years have been about. The taxpayer has a right to understand and it can get lost in the headlines.

“Obviously some people suggest we are only talking about the good stuff. Nobody but a fool would highlight the negative.

“I do not see that it’s any different to what the government did with the White Paper.”

She said she would not support the distribution of the material – due to go out with council tax bills – if it was about “trying to promote individuals in the council”.