Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ex north-east charity worker claims colleagues’ lies led to her dismissal

A former employee has taken Aberdeen Foyer to an employment tribunal.
A former employee has taken Aberdeen Foyer to an employment tribunal.

A former charity worker has claimed colleagues fabricated lies which ultimately led to her dismissal.

Rebecca Neil has taken Aberdeen Foyer to an employment tribunal, alleging she was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against because she had depression and anxiety.

Mrs Neil worked for the organisation, which primarily helps the homeless and vulnerable young people, between 2012 and 2018.

However, her contract was terminated when the charity found she was guilty of gross misconduct after a colleague claimed she had breached client confidentiality by discussing private information with other staff.

Yesterday Mrs Neil gave evidence and was cross-examined by Ramiza Mohammed on behalf of Aberdeen Foyer.

Ms Mohammed suggested that while Mrs Neil had been running a course designed to help vulnerable people back into work, she had openly discussed clients’ personal lives, including telling colleagues that two of them had Asperger’s syndrome.

The solicitor also said the colleagues, from the North East Scotland College (Nescol), had claimed Mrs Neil had told them that one of the people on the course was on benefits.

However Mrs Neil rejected the claims and said the pair had colluded to damage her reputation – but was unable to say why they would do this.

Earlier in the tribunal, Mrs Neil had claimed she had been on medication at her disciplinary hearing which led to her sacking, which had left her feeling “discombobulated” and had affected her ability to defend herself.

But under examination by Ms Mohammed, she admitted that she did not ask for a break and did not formally raise her medication issue, though she had mentioned it to a human resources manager before the meeting.

Ms Mohammed put it to her that her employers could not have taken action to ensure it was a fair hearing if they did not know.

She also said that Mrs Neil had answered questions in a detailed manner and had not shown any signs of being unwell during the hearing.

Mrs Neil had been signed off sick from work due to depression and anxiety caused by stress in the summer of 2017, and was then given a phased return the following January.

But not long after her return the allegations were made against her and an internal investigation was launched which ultimately led to her dismissal.

The tribunal continues.