Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors urged to say no to Chapelton of Elsick roads bid

Chapelton of Elsick
Chapelton of Elsick

A bid by landowners behind plans for Aberdeenshire’s newest town to slash their £8million contribution towards upgrading the roads around Aberdeenshire’s newest town could be thrown out next week.

The Duke of Fife – the Queen’s cousin – and Alexander Shepherd, who own the Chapelton of Elsick site near Newtonhill, have applied to reduce their contribution to just £287,000.

They want to change the terms of their agreement with Aberdeenshire Council, which was made after plans for the first 4,045 homes of the site were approved.

The developers argue that since the Scottish Government last year ruled that developers could only be asked to contribute to transport improvements for a particular scheme, they should not need to pay out £8million – which would be put towards the cost of the Aberdeen bypass and Third Don Crossing.

Lawyers for Lord Fife and Mr Burnett claim their revised offer of £287,000 would cover improvements from their site to the Bridge of Dee, on the A90 Aberdeen to Dundee road, and the A956.

And in their supporting statement, which members of the Kincardine and Mearns area committee will consider next week, the developers say that the impact of the scheme would have a “modest” impact on traffic and does not justify the £8million.

But Aberdeenshire Council’s director of infrastructure services Stephen Archer tells councillors in a report that the development will cause traffic to increase of up to 16% on the A90 south of Charleston, and that at all River Dee crossings there would be an increase of up to 29%.

He argues that the developer has “misread” the government’s examination findings, and that they do not propose a “significant change” to the way contributions are calculated.

He adds: “There is therefore no justifiable basis for the alternative transport contributions proposed by the applicants.

“This would result in a significant shortfall to the provision of strategic transport infrastructure to mitigate the impact of the development which would require to be met by the public purse.”

Last night Lord Southesk, director of Elsick Development Co and son of the Duke of Fife, said the firm was pushing for the change in the contribution amount because it was “unlawful”.

He stressed the firm was committed to investing in infrastructure required for their development, including a £1million roundabout at Newtonhill and £12million grade-separated junction on the A90.