Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Major Buchan housing development plans thrown out

The planned Stuartfield development
The planned Stuartfield development

A controversial bid to build 19 new houses in a Buchan village collapsed last night amid concerns over road safety.

The six-acre scheme proposed for Stuartfield, submitted by Fraserburgh-based housing firm Colaren Homes, was discussed at yesterday’s meeting of the Buchan Area Committee.

The development, on land next to Knock Street, could have created as many as 75 new homes over the next decade as part of a larger 23-acre masterplan programme for the village.

However, councillors supported the advice of planning officials and refused the proposal because the access road to the site was too narrow.

Last night, Buchan councillor Norman Smith said that the process had been an “unfortunate thing from the word go”.

He also criticised the planning service by saying that it was “creaking at the seams”.

Mr Smith’s sentiments were echoed by Councillor Jim Ingram who had previously welcomed the proposal.

The applicant will now have the option resubmit their plans – free of charge – with amended drawings to ensure that the road meets the planning service’s standards.

They had only failed to do so on the original application due to a mix-up with where boundaries were in the site.

Mr Ingram added: “We are fairly close to being able to resolve this – I think an agreement can be reached, but we just need a little bit of time. It’s acceptable all-round and I am perfectly in favor of housing applications.

“I’m just concerned that it rolls on for more than two cycles (of area committee meetings) because we’re talking about people’s jobs.”

Kevin O’Brien, the agent for the application, had suggested to members that the developer was willing to accept a planning limitation that would have prevented construction until the road issues were addressed if they were minded to approve the application.

Ultimately, this was not found to be competent by planners.

It is hoped that the new planning application will be given priority by local authority planners and be rushed through in time for the Buchan Area Committee in May.