Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Developer loses appeal that would pave way for more homes near Portlethen

Artist's impression's of Hillside Primary School, in Portlethen
Artist's impression's of Hillside Primary School, in Portlethen

A north-east developer has lost its appeal to expand a 840-home development on the edge of Aberdeenshire.

House builders Stewart Milne Group (SMG) wanted to have the cap on their scheme at Schoolhill, Portlethen, removed, but objections were lodged amid fears local amenities would not be able to cope.

The firm put forward the bid after identifying land within the settlement and masterplan area that could accommodate between 190-260 homes.

But councillors rejected their application, with concerns raised about the pressure it would put on the already-overcrowded Portlethen Primary School.

Although SMG appealed to the Scottish Government, a reporter – who considered the impact on roads, healthcare, education and affordable housing as well as the local development plan – upheld the decision.

The developers then took their case to the Court of Session – where judges also upheld Aberdeenshire Council’s ruling.

In their judgement, published yesterday, Lord Menzies, Lady Smith and Lady Clark of Calton dismissed SMG’s argument that the reporter had considered “amenities” too broadly.

However, they acknowledged his argument that the existing pressure on schools in the area would be addressed through the new £13million Hillside School currently being built.

But they upheld the reporter’s point that the developer contributions to the new school – which would increase if the development was expanded – would only add up to around £1million, and that the additional cost of building a larger school to cope with the additional demand would be £2.4million.

They add: “It was not suggested, either to the reporter or before us, that any developer contribution from the appellants would be sufficient to provide capital funding to expand the new school from its initial capacity of 355 pupils to an expanded capacity of 540 pupils.

“In our view, counsel for the respondents was correct to observe that the term “amenity” is apt to include adequate and convenient access to services such as shops, transport links and schools.”

Plans for the Schoolhill development were first lodged with the council in 2000 and full planning permission was granted in December 2004.

Last night a spokesman for SMG said: “We are very disappointed at the decision which delays the delivery of new homes for Portlethen. We will now consider how we bring forward proposals for the remaining land at Portlethen to ensure delivery in line with the new school, which is now underway.”