Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fever-pitch tension in debate over Dons stadium

Post Thumbnail

Supporters and objectors of the new £50million Dons stadium at Kingsford packed into the Town House yesterday to deliver their final impassioned pleas ahead of a decision next month.

More than 40 submissions were made for and against the 20,000-seat arena, training academy and heritage museum between Westhill and Kingswells, including one from Aberdeen manager Derek McInnes.

The crunch meeting lasted more than seven hours. The project would be delivered in two phases, with the community and sports facilities and football academy constructed first and the stadium built in the second phase.

The club aims to be playing matches at the new stadium in the 2020-21 season. The project will be considered by full council in October.

Tensions ran so high during the lead-up to yesterday’s public hearing that security staff deemed it necessary to search bags of members of the public who arrived to view proceedings from the gallery.

Dons boss Mr McInnes was one of the first to state the case for the move from Pittodrie. He said: “At the same time our performance and results will drop as we are unable to attract good players. (The development) would be a real game changer for us and such a fantastic opportunity for us to strengthen our aims and desire to become a rated club in Europe.”

Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce threw its weight behind the argument, with chief executive Russell Borthwick saying that backing the stadium is vital for the city as it looks to recover from the oil downturn.

Andrew McKinlay, from the Scottish FA, said the governing body was behind the club’s ambitious plans, and that securing a new ground would likely be crucial if the club were to qualify for the Europa League group stages in the future.

Westhill For Kingsford group member Keith Sinclair called on councillors to grant planning permission, and said he and other fans objected to being labelled troublemakers, a barb at No Kingsford Stadium campaigners who claim crowd trouble from supporters would put extra burden on police. He said: “I’m insulted that we’re called hooligans and drunken louts because it suits their agenda.”

Kingswells Community Council and the No Kingsford Stadium campaign group were joined by several residents from the area who joined forces to launch their vehement objections to councillors.

Heather Brock, a Westhill resident, said: “We were told six years ago that the club had to move to a new stadium if it wanted success. The club is now the second best team in the country.

“They are guilty of scaremongering. The Kingsford stadium will be a football stadium, nothing more. It will not benefit the community.”

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon opted to sit on the fence yesterday rather than take sides in the stadium debate.

Asked for her verdict during a visit to the north-east, the Ayr United fan said: “First and foremost, it’s for the football club to decide what the best future and outcome for it is and I’ll let them debate them and wish them every success on whatever they decide to do.”

We are not nimbys

Community council representatives opposed to the development told the packed meeting they were not “nimbys” and were reflecting the views of local residents.

Kingswells and Westhill community councils have both objected formally to the proposals, fearing a massive increase in traffic and the eradication of green belt land which seperates Aberdeen from the neighbouring shire.

Yesterday, they both sent representatives to speak and answer questions to the planning committee ahead of their key decision.

Audrey Findlay, the chairwoman of Westhill and Elrick Community Council, maintained that people against the development had been abused on social media by supporters.

She said: “It seems that local people against this project are simply dismissed.

“Green belt policy is very clear in planning documents, but it has been swept aside by (the club) in their application.

“There are very strong feelings both for and against this project, but at the end of the day this is a planning application and you must only take planning into account.”

Ian Cox, the secretary of Kingswells Community Council, added: “We acknowledge the majority of Kingswells residents are in favour of this development.

“But the football stadium will provide the same benefits to the city no matter where it is located.

“We have worked with the consultation on  the Prime Four business park- we are not nimbys.

“This site is the last piece of green belt that separates two communities who want to maintain their own identities.”