Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council planning committee rejects £68 million Rubislaw Quarry plan

Canadian developers Carttera wanted to build 299 rented properties at the west-end
Canadian developers Carttera wanted to build 299 rented properties at the west-end

Ambitious £68 million plans to build nearly 300 luxury flats at Aberdeen’s historic Rubislaw Quarry have been thrown out.

Canadian developers Carttera wanted to build 299 rented properties at the west-end home of the city’s granite industry and also a resident’s gym, mini-museum and public bistro.

The firm argued their development was a vote of confidence in the beleaguered north-east economy and would open up the site – one of Europe’s largest man-made holes – to the public for the first time in more than 40 years.

Planners back £68m Rubislaw Quarry flats scheme

But the scheme has proved highly controversial in the local area, attracting more than 350 objections.

Concerns were raised about the potential impact of animals living at the site, an increase in parking problems and the 10-storey height of the buildings across the landscape.

Ahead of yesterday’s planning committee meeting, council officers had recommended the scheme for approval, pointing to economic benefits and that the unusual design would add “something different” to the skyline.

But ultimately the committee voted by seven to two to reject it on grounds of “over-development” and “visual impact” fears.

Conservative Alan Donnelly moved to grant the application, backed by Aberdeen Labour’s Taqueer Malik, pointing to a promised £4million contribution towards affordable housing in Aberdeen.

He said: “The city has to, over the next 25 years, develop 35,000 homes.

“This is a £68 million investment in the city, with £4 million for affordable housing, and we want to knock it back? Economic reasons are important considerations.”

But Hazlehead Liberal Democrat Martin Greig, supported by SNP Hazlehead member John Cooke, moved to reject the plan.

Mr Cooke said: “I am not going through the motions on this to be popular with the locals.

“I think the impact on wildlife could potentially be serious.”

Last night the firm announced it was planning to appeal the decision.

The plan had led to a war of words between the Canadian firm and local businessman Hugh Black, who wants to create a £6 million heritage centre on the southern edge of the site.

Mr Black’s wife, Gillian, said following the meeting: “I’m delighted that councillors have listened to the opinions the people who were totally against this development.”

Carttera has already vowed to appeal the committee’s decision.

Maggie Bochel, of Aurora Planning Limited, who worked with Carterra, said: “Although there were a lot of positive comments made by the committee members in relation to a number of aspects of the development, such as allowing for public access to the quarry and the provision of the heritage bistro, as well as the form of housing proposed, we are obviously disappointed with the outcome.

“We will need to await the issue of the decision notice before taking any further steps but we are still firmly committed to investing in the City and will submit an appeal once we have received that.”

Aberdeen South Conservative MP Ross Thomson had been an opponent of the development.

Last night Mr Thomson, who represented the area as a councillor before becoming an MP, said: “I am delighted that councillors have rejected this proposal, which would have constituted a major over-development of this historic site.

“We should be preserving areas like Rubislaw Quarry – it is a very important part of the heritage of Aberdeen.

“I congratulate those who campaigned against this proposal. They made their case forcefully and with great passion for their city.”