Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeen councillors urged to reverse one way streets plans

Post Thumbnail

Councillors have been urged to perform a U-turn on plans to create two one-way streets in Aberdeen.

A consultation was launched in 2017 into the proposals for Gray Street and Salisbury Terrace due to the large number of parked cars making it difficult for two lines of traffic to pass through them.

There had been complaints of cars being damaged as other traffic navigated its way on the streets.

The results of an informal questionnaire showed around 80% of those who responded in Gray Street were in favour of the change while around 60% backed the plans for Salisbury Terrace.

However, local businesses complained about the proposal which they said would be “detrimental to their ongoing trading” according to a report to councillors.

The Aberdeen Cycle Forum has submitted an objection on the basis it’s considered the one-way system does not benefit cyclists or pedestrians.

Ashley and Broomhill Community Council expressed concern about the extent of the informal consultation and the number of letters sent out and said that the AWPR could reduce traffic on the streets anyway.

The report reads: “As can be appreciated from the objections received, the introduction of a oneway system can be highly contentious and can have wide ramifications when considering possible negative outcomes.

“A common theme from objectors is whether the occasion where opposing vehicles may meet really warrants the introduction on a one-way system?”

Now a report to next week’s operational delivery committee has recommended councillors vote to “take no further action”.